Many women throughout the world have history of subfertility (resolved or unresolved), but much remains unknown about services and treatments chosen.
Methods
We developed a mixed-mode fertility experiences questionnaire (FEQ) in 2009 through literature review and iterative pilot work to optimize question format and mode of administration. The focus of the FEQ is to collect data retrospectively on time at risk for pregnancy, fertility treatments received and declined, pregnancy, time to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. We conducted a validation of key elements of the FEQ with comparison to medical records in 2009 and 2010. The validation sample was selected from women initially seen at a specialized fertility treatment center in Utah in 2004.
Results
The FEQ was optimized with two components: 1) written (paper or web-based), self-administered, followed by 2) telephoneadministered questions. In 63 patients analyzed, high levels of correlation were identified between patient self-report and medical records for the use of intrauterine insemination and assisted reproductive technology, pregnancy and live birth histories, time at risk for pregnancy and time to pregnancy. There was low correlation between medical records and self-report for the use of oral ovulation drugs and injectable ovulation drugs. Compared to the medical record, the FEQ was over 90% sensitive for all elements, except injectable ovulation drugs (70% sensitivity).
Conclusions
The FEQ accurately captured elements of fertility treatment history at 5-6 years after the first visit to a specialty clinic.
Thomas FS, Stanford JB, Sanders JN, Gurtcheff SE, Gibson M, Porucznik CA, Simonsen SE (2015). Development and initial validation of a fertility experiences questionnaire. *Reproductive health*. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0054-3
Thomas FS, Stanford JB, Sanders JN, Gurtcheff SE, Gibson M, Porucznik CA, et al. Development and initial validation of a fertility experiences questionnaire.
Thomas, Frank Scarlett, et al. *Development and initial validation of a fertility experiences questionnaire*.
Moss CF et al., 2025
Open Access
JAMA Network Open
Importance: Medical gaslighting, in which a patient's concerns are dismissed without proper evaluation, has been described anecdotally in vulvovaginal patient care, but has not been quantified.
Object...
General OB/GYN > Clinical Practice > QualityBody Literacy > Patient Empowerment > Self-AdvocacyEthics/Philosophy > RRM Philosophy > Clinical Ethics
Background: Five to ten percent of women experience period pains that disrupt their lives yet 4 in 5 women believe that their claims for their dysmenorrhea are not taken seriously. Within the process ...
In recent years, the term 'medical gaslighting' and accompanying accounts of self-identified women experiencing invalidation, dismissal and inadequate care have proliferated in the media. Gaslighting ...
Hinton L et al., 2012The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Background: Infertility affects 9% of couples in the UK. Most couples who visit their GP because they are worried about their fertility will ultimately conceive, but a few will not. Treatment usually ...
Infertility > Couple-Based > CounselingGeneral OB/GYN > Clinical Practice > QualityEthics/Philosophy > Informed Consent > Patient Rights