Effect of sex, menstrual cycle phase, and monophasic oral contraceptive pill use on local and central arterial stiffness in young adults

American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 315(2), H357-H365

DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00039.2018 PMID 29677465

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. Previous sex-based investigations of local and central stiffness report inconsistent findings and have not controlled for menstrual cycle phase in women. There is also evidence that sex hormones influence the vasculature, but their impact on arterial stiffness across a natural menstrual (NAT) or oral contraceptive pill (OCP) cycle has been understudied. This study sought to 1) examine potential sex differences in local and central stiffness, 2) compare stiffness profiles between NAT and OCP cycles, and 3) investigate the relationship between duration of OCP use and arterial stiffness. Sex hormone concentrations, β-stiffness index (local stiffness), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [cfPWV (central stiffness)] were assessed in 53 healthy adults (22 ± 3 yr old, 20 men, 15 NAT women, and 18 OCP women). All participants were tested three times: men on the same day and time 1 wk apart, NAT women in menstrual, midfollicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle, and OCP women in placebo, early active and late active pill phases. β-Stiffness was higher in men than NAT and OCP women ( P < 0.001), whereas cfPWV was similar between groups ( P = 0.09). β-Stiffness and cfPWV did not differ across or between NAT and OCP cycles ( P > 0.05 for both) and were not associated with duration of OCP use (β-stiffness: r = 0.003, P = 0.99; cfPWV: r = -0.26, P = 0.30). The apparent sex differences in local, but not central, stiffness highlight the importance of assessing both indexes in comparisons between men and women. Furthermore, fluctuating sex hormone levels do not appear to influence β-stiffness or cfPWV. Therefore, these stiffness indexes may need to be assessed during only one cycle phase in women in future investigations. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We observed higher local, but not central, arterial stiffness in men than women. We also demonstrated that there are no differences in arterial stiffness between naturally cycling women and women who use monophasic oral contraceptive pills, and that the duration of oral contraceptive pill use does not influence arterial stiffness.

Topics

Priest Shenouda MacDonald sex menstrual cycle phase oral contraceptive arterial stiffness, local central arterial stiffness carotid femoral pulse wave velocity sex differences, menstrual cycle phase follicular luteal arterial compliance vascular function, monophasic oral contraceptive pill use arterial stiffness cardiovascular risk women, estrogen progesterone vascular function endothelial arterial stiffness cycle variation, American Journal Physiology Heart 2018 sex OCP arterial stiffness, carotid artery stiffness aortic pulse wave velocity sex-based comparison controlled, hormonal contraception cardiovascular risk vascular stiffness young healthy women, menstrual cycle hormonal fluctuation vascular compliance pulse wave analysis, OCP users versus nonusers arterial stiffness follicular versus luteal phase
PMID 29677465 29677465 DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00039.2018 10.1152/ajpheart.00039.2018

Cite this article

Priest, S. E., Shenouda, N., & MacDonald, M. (2018). Effect of sex, menstrual cycle phase, and monophasic oral contraceptive pill use on local and central arterial stiffness in young adults. *American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology*, *315*(2), H357-H365. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00039.2018