Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome.
Design Systematic review of published randomised, placebo controlled trials.
STUDIES REVIEWED: 10 trials of progesterone therapy (531 women) and four trials of progestogen therapy (378 women).
Main Outcome Measures Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progesterone preparations (suppositories and oral micronised). Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progestogens. Secondary analysis of efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in managing physical and behavioural symptoms.
Results Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed efficacy of progesterone (by both routes of administration) was -0.028 (95% confidence interval -0.017 to -0.040). The odds ratio was 1.05 (1.03 to 1.08) in favour of progesterone, indicating no clinically important difference between progesterone and placebo. For progestogens the overall standardised mean was -0.036 (-0.014 to -0.060), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) showing a statistically, but not clinically, significant improvement for women taking progestogens.
Conclusion The evidence from these meta-analyses does not support the use of progesterone or progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome.
progesterone premenstrual syndrome, progestogen PMS treatment, systematic review PMS, placebo-controlled PMS trial, progesterone suppositories efficacy, oral micronised progesterone, dydrogesterone PMS, menstrual cycle mood treatment, luteal phase supplementation PMS, premenstrual dysphoric disorder treatment
Keywords
Female, Humans, Odds Ratio, Premenstrual Syndrome/drug Therapy, Progesterone/therapeutic Use, Progestins/therapeutic Use, Randomized Controlled Trials As Topic, Treatment Outcome, Progestins, Progesterone