The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and related regulations (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) give FDA staff the legal authority and responsibility to review the safety and effectiveness of drugs and biological products (including products used in cancer treatment), from preclinical testing through all phases of clinical research and marketing. FDA review activities in the oncology arena can be divided into five major categories: (1) initial review of investigational new drug (IND) applications; (2) ongoing review of premarketing research (including new research protocols submitted to existing INDs and IND safety reports describing adverse events with the new drug); (3) discussions with commercial sponsors regarding their clinical development plans, including the design and conduct of key studies that are intended to support initial marketing approval for a new product or to support the addition of new indications to the prescribing information for currently marketed products; (4) review of submitted new drug applications (NDAs) or biological licensing applications (BLAs); and (5) continuing review of the safety and effectiveness of marketed products. Through these review activities, FDA staff work to ensure that products approved for marketing for cancer treatment are effective and adequately safe for their intended uses and to ensure that the quality, effectiveness, and safety of products on the market are preserved or enhanced, so patients and physicians may use these products with confidence and with adequate safety. Because these review activities generally fall into a chronologic sequence, the following discussion parallels the development course of a typical new drug.
FDA drug review process cancer treatment approval, FDA oncology drug regulatory review practices, investigational new drug application FDA cancer, new drug application biological licensing FDA review, FDA premarketing research clinical development oncology, drug approval process safety effectiveness cancer, FDA regulatory framework pharmaceutical review priorities, clinical trial phases FDA oversight drug marketing, FDA IND NDA BLA review activities, federal drug regulation oncology therapeutics safety
PMID 11795373 11795373 DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb04042.x 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb04042.x
Cite this article
Kobayashi K, & DeLap RJ (2001). FDA review practices and priorities for drugs used in cancer treatment. *Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences*, *949*(1), 341-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb04042.x
Kobayashi K, DeLap RJ. FDA review practices and priorities for drugs used in cancer treatment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001;949(1):341-344. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb04042.x
Kobayashi K, and DeLap RJ. "FDA review practices and priorities for drugs used in cancer treatment." *Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences*, vol. 949, no. 1, 2001, pp. 341-344.
Härkki P et al., 2010Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Endometriosis-associated infertility is poorly treatable with various forms of surgery. Therefore, assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs), such as controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, intrauterine in...
Endometriosis > Infertility > Assisted Reproduction OutcomesInfertility > Treatment > IVF and EndometriosisEndometriosis > Surgery > Ovarian Reserve Preservation
Popat VB et al., 2008Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Menstruation is the cyclic, orderly sloughing of the uterine lining on account of the interactions of hormones produced by the hypothalamus, pituitary, and ovaries. There is a tendency among parents a...
Bulun SE et al., 2002Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Aromatase activity is absent in normal endometrium. In contrast, aromatase is expressed aberrantly in endometriosis, which gives rise to strikingly high levels of aromatase activity in this tissue. Bo...
Endometriosis > Pathophysiology > Estrogen Production and MetabolismReproductive Endocrinology > Steroidogenesis > Aromatase ActivityEndometriosis > Treatment > Aromatase Inhibitors