Body Literacy Patient Education

Fertility awareness in 97,414 women trying to conceive: gaps, misconceptions, and implications for reproductive education

Wainwright E, Ali Z, Lawrie L, Getreu N, O'Neill HC

Published August 22, 2025 Reproductive Health, 22(1), 152
DOI 10.1186/s12978-025-02079-x PMID 40846945 PMC PMC12374389

RRM Academy Synopsis

4 in 10 UK women trying to conceive lack fertile window knowledge

About 4 in 10 women trying to conceive did not know their fertile window, a 2025 UK survey of 97,414 women found. Scores were lower with irregular cycles, younger age, non-White ethnicity and longer time trying.

Key Findings

  • 13.4% of the women did not know when their fertile window was, and a further 27.6% were unsure.
  • 42.5% of women under 25 knew their fertile window. Knowledge generally rose with age, then fell back to 47.6% at 45 and older.
  • 73.9% of women with regular cycles knew their fertile window, compared with 26.8% of women with irregular cycles and 8.5% of women not getting periods.
  • 16.7% could not say how long their cycle was. Irregular cycles had an adjusted odds ratio of 8.161 (97.5% CI 7.864–8.469) for not knowing the fertile window, versus regular cycles.

Interpretation

This cross-sectional study surveyed 97,414 UK women trying to conceive, using an online health assessment. Knowledge of the fertile window tracked closely with cycle regularity, and also varied by age, ethnicity and how long a woman had been trying to conceive. Women who had been pregnant before were more likely to know the fertile window. The authors note the survey did not collect income or education data, which could also shape fertility knowledge. The findings support larger studies on whether targeted fertility education closes these gaps and shortens time to pregnancy.

RRM Context

The authors cite research showing fertility awareness methods shortened time to pregnancy in people with no fertility trouble, in several countries including the UK. A US survey they cite found 60% of people thought ovulation falls on day 14. Restorative reproductive medicine starts from a woman's own cycle chart. It evaluates both partners.

Abstract

Background

Fertility rates in the UK are at an all-time low, with infertility affecting approximately 1 in 7 couples. Despite the rising demand for fertility services, fertility awareness, specifically knowledge of ovulation and the fertile window, remains low among women of reproductive age. Most existing studies offer a broad perspective, lacking focus on women actively trying to conceive (TTC). This study aims to assess the level of understanding surrounding the fertile window among women TTC, identifying factors associated with knowledge gaps.

Methods

A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 97,414 women actively TTC who answered an online health assessment was conducted. Participants provided information on menstrual cycle characteristics, previous pregnancies, and fertility knowledge, including the timing of the fertile window. Frequencies, percentages were calculated and chi-squared tests performed to assess differences in categorical data. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) to better understand factors significantly associated with not knowing the fertile window.

Results

Out of the total respondents (97,414), over a third (33,756, 41%) could not accurately identify the fertile window, with substantial misconceptions observed across all age groups and ethnicities. Women with previous pregnancies were more likely to correctly identify the fertile window (OR = 1.45, 97.5% CI: 1.20-1.75, p < 0.001). However, knowledge was significantly lower among those with irregular cycles, non-White ethnicities, younger age groups and longer time TTC. Additionally, misconceptions about cycle regularity were apparent, of 60,322 women describing their cycles as regular 10% did not know their cycle length (66,95) and a further 2.9% fell outside of the clinically regular 21-35 day range. These misconceptions followed a similar trend with younger age groups, non-white ethnicities and longer time TTC having significantly increased rates of misidentifying regular cycles. This further increased the odds of not knowing their fertile window (OR = 2.99, 97.5% CI: 2.83-3.17, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings reveal gaps in fertility awareness among women actively TTC. Addressing these knowledge gaps through targeted educational interventions could potentially reduce time-to-pregnancy and the reliance on assisted reproductive technologies. Improved fertility education focusing on cycle tracking and ovulation timing is essential to assist women with accurate information during their TTC journey.

Topics

Related research

Body Literacy › Patient Education › Fertility Knowledge and Misconceptions
Esther Wainwright, Zoya Ali, Lucinda Lawrie, Natalie Getreu, Helen C O'Neill
E Wainwright, Z Ali, L Lawrie, N Getreu, H O'Neill
PMID 40846945 40846945 DOI 10.1186/s12978-025-02079-x 10.1186/s12978-025-02079-x Wainwright et al. 2025, Wainwright 2025