FSH and bone--important physiology or not?

Trends in Molecular Medicine, 13(1), 1-3

DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004 PMID 17141571

Abstract

For many years, osteoporosis in women was equated with estrogen deficiency. The recent articles by Zaidi and colleagues offer a new challenge to the estrogen-deficiency-osteoporosis hypothesis by showing that follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulates osteoclastic bone resorption perhaps through tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). These authors, however, neglected to mention bone abnormalities and high testosterone levels that were previously shown in FSH-receptor knockout and other modified mice. It is also possible that they have overemphasized potential relationships of these new data with human bone loss. Despite these fascinating data, the paradigm of FSH causing hypogonadal bone loss is not yet ready to displace the estrogen-deficiency-osteoporosis paradigm, although that model already faces considerable challenge.

Topics

Prior JC FSH bone resorption physiology, follicle stimulating hormone osteoclastic bone loss, FSH receptor knockout mice bone abnormalities, estrogen deficiency osteoporosis hypothesis challenge, Zaidi FSH osteoclast TNF-alpha bone resorption, hypogonadal bone loss FSH versus estrogen paradigm, reproductive hormones bone metabolism women, FSH stimulated bone resorption tumor necrosis factor, Prior JC progesterone bone density estrogen critique, menopausal bone loss hormonal mechanisms FSH
PMID 17141571 17141571 DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004

Cite this article

Prior, J. C. (2007). FSH and bone--important physiology or not?. *Trends in molecular medicine*, *13*(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004