No justification for using IUD to treat menorrhagia

The Linacre Quarterly, 75(3), 177-178

DOI 10.1179/002436308803889530

Abstract

This article questions the conclusions drawn by the author of "The Mirena® Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System and Its Application to the Treatment of Menorrhagia: A Moral Opinion" (Linacre Quarterly 75 [2008]: 60–70), i.e., that it is justified to use this intrauterine device to treat heavy periods of unknown etiology by the principle of double effect.

Topics

Mirena IUD menorrhagia moral ethical analysis, levonorgestrel intrauterine system heavy menstrual bleeding ethics, Raviele Mirena menorrhagia Catholic moral theology, IUD treatment menorrhagia principle of double effect, Mirena levonorgestrel IUS heavy periods ethical objection, intrauterine device menorrhagia unknown etiology moral opinion, Catholic teaching hormonal IUD menorrhagia treatment, Linacre Quarterly Mirena menorrhagia double effect, ethical concerns levonorgestrel IUD gynecological treatment, menorrhagia treatment alternatives IUD moral justification
DOI 10.1179/002436308803889530 10.1179/002436308803889530

Cite this article

Raviele, K. M. (2008). No justification for using IUD to treat menorrhagia. *The Linacre Quarterly*, *75*(3), 177-178. https://doi.org/10.1179/002436308803889530

Related articles