Lateral temperature spread of monopolar, bipolar and ultrasonic instruments for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

BJU International, 114(2), 245-252

DOI 10.1111/bju.12498 PMID 24127773

Abstract

Objective

To assess critical heat spread of cautery instruments used in robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery.

Materials and Methods

Thermal spread along bovine musculofascial tissues was examined by infrared camera, histology and enzyme assay. Currently used monopolar, bipolar and ultrasonic laparoscopic instruments were investigated at various power settings and application times. The efficacy of using an additional Maryland clamp as a heat sink was evaluated. A temperature of 45 °C was considered the threshold temperature for possible nerve damage.

Results

Monopolar instruments exhibited a mean (sem) critical thermal spread of 3.5 (2.3) mm when applied at 60 W for 1 s. After 2 s, the spread was >20 mm. For adjustable bipolar instruments the mean (sem) critical thermal spread was 2.2 (0.6) mm at 60 W and 1 s, and 3.6 (1.3) mm at 2 s. The PK and LigaSure forceps had mean (sem) critical thermal spreads of 3.9 (0.8) and 2.8 (0.6) mm respectively, whereas the ultrasonic instrument reached 2.9 (0.8) mm. Application of an additional Maryland clamp as a heat sink, significantly reduced the thermal spread. Histomorphometric analyses and enzyme assay supported these findings.

Conclusions

All coagulation devices used in RAL surgery have distinct thermal spreads depending on power setting and application time. Cautery may be of concern due to lateral temperature spread, causing potential damage to sensitive structures including nerves. Our results provide surgeons with a resource for educated decision-making when using coagulation devices during robotic procedures.

Topics

thermal spread monopolar bipolar ultrasonic robotic laparoscopic surgery, lateral heat spread cautery instruments robot-assisted surgery, nerve damage temperature threshold coagulation devices laparoscopy, Maryland clamp heat sink thermal spread reduction surgery, infrared camera thermal spread bovine tissue cautery comparison, monopolar versus bipolar versus ultrasonic energy device safety, LigaSure PK forceps thermal spread robotic surgery, critical heat spread power settings application time laparoscopic instruments, coagulation device safety nerve-sparing robotic surgery, energy device thermal injury robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
PMID 24127773 24127773 DOI 10.1111/bju.12498 10.1111/bju.12498

Cite this article

Hefermehl, L. J., Largo, R. A., Hermanns, T., Poyet, C., Sulser, T., & Eberli, D. (2014). Lateral temperature spread of monopolar, bipolar and ultrasonic instruments for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. *BJU international*, *114*(2), 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12498