Prevention of preterm birth in high-risk patients: the role of education and provider contact versus home uterine monitoring

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 164(3), 756-762

DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90510-x PMID 2003537

Abstract

A total of 394 patients were enrolled in a study to assess the effectiveness of an educational preterm delivery prevention program and to determine whether the addition of home uterine monitoring to the program improved results in patients at high risk of preterm labor. Both the educational program and home uterine monitoring were found to increase the percentage of women with preterm labor who sought care while still favorable for long-term suppression, resulting in a decreased incidence of preterm births and improved outcome when compared with similar high-risk patients who did not participate in these programs. In a randomized, prospective study, addition of home uterine monitoring to the educational program was found to significantly improve outcome in twin gestations but not in singleton gestations. However, the number of singleton pregnancies was too small to rule out possible benefit from home uterine monitoring in that group.

Topics

preterm birth prevention education provider contact high risk, home uterine monitoring preterm labor prevention effectiveness, patient education preterm delivery prevention program, home uterine monitoring twin gestation preterm birth, randomized trial uterine activity monitoring singleton twin, Dyson preterm labor prevention education monitoring, high risk pregnancy preterm labor detection program, early detection preterm labor tocolysis success rate, preterm birth prevention singleton versus twin pregnancy, uterine contraction monitoring outpatient preterm labor
PMID 2003537 2003537 DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90510-x 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90510-x

Cite this article

Dyson, D. C., Crites, Y. M., Ray, D. A., & Armstrong, M. A. (1991). Prevention of preterm birth in high-risk patients: the role of education and provider contact versus home uterine monitoring. *American journal of obstetrics and gynecology*, *164*(3), 756-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90510-x

Related articles