Questions have been raised about the effects of progestogen-only contraceptive use on bone health, particularly among young women who have not yet reached peak bone mass and perimenopausal women who may be starting to lose bone mass. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the association between progestogen-only contraceptive use and fracture risk or bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 39 articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE, published through July 2005. One study reported that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users were more likely to experience stress fractures than nonusers; this association was not statistically significant after controlling for baseline bone density. In cross-sectional studies, the mean BMD in DMPA users was usually below that of nonusers, but within 1 SD. In longitudinal studies, BMD generally decreased more over time among DMPA users than among nonusers, but women gained BMD upon discontinuation of DMPA. Limited evidence suggested that use of progestogen-only contraceptives other than DMPA did not affect BMD.
progestogen-only contraception bone density, dmpa bone mineral density, depot medroxyprogesterone bone health, contraceptive side effects bone loss, progestin contraception fracture risk, hormonal contraception skeletal health, bone density young women contraception, perimenopausal contraception bone effects, reversible bone density loss dmpa, systematic review contraceptive bone health
Cite this article
Curtis, K. M., & Martins, S. L. (2006). Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review. *Contraception*, *73*(5), 470-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.12.010
Curtis KM, Martins SL. Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review. Contraception. 2006;73(5):470-487. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.12.010
Curtis, Kathryn M., and Summer L. Martins. "Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review." *Contraception*, vol. 73, no. 5, 2006, pp. 470-487.
Background: Several studies, including an earlier analysis from the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Oral Contraception Study, have suggested that ever users of oral contraceptives have a...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionBone Health > Menstrual Cycle Effects > Ovulatory DisturbancesGeneral OB/GYN > Epidemiology > Trends
Background: Little is known on fracture risk in young women using oral contraceptives.
Study Design: Case-control study (64,548 cases, 193,641 controls).
Results: Overall, no major association with ri...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionBone Health > Menstrual Cycle Effects > Ovulatory DisturbancesGeneral OB/GYN > Epidemiology > Prevalence
IntroductionPrior studies have suggested that oral contraceptives (OCs) may be associated with an increased fracture risk. However, the previous studies have only performed a limited adjustment for ot...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionBone Health > Menstrual Cycle Effects > Ovulatory Disturbances
There is good evidence that estrogens and progestogens have an important effect on bone metabolism. This article explores the relationship between oral contraceptive (OC) use and fractures occurring a...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionBone Health > Menstrual Cycle Effects > Ovulatory DisturbancesContraception/Comparison > FABM vs Hormonal > Side Effects