Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology

Gomel V

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology

Gomel V, 2016

Fertility and Sterility, 105(4), 887-890

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

Surgery > Microsurgery > Tubal Infertility > Female Factor > Tubal Factor Surgery > Laparoscopy > Technique

tubal microsurgery fertility restoration, reconstructive tubal surgery outcomes, tubal factor infertility surgery, microsurgery versus ivf, fallopian tube reconstruction, tubal anastomosis fertility, tubal ligation reversal microsurgery, reproductive microsurgery techniques, surgical treatment tubal infertility, tubal reconstruction pregnancy rates, gomel microsurgery, fertility preserving tubal surgery

Cite this article

Gomel V (2016). Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology. *Fertility and Sterility*, *105*(4), 887-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology

Abstract

Topics

Cite this article

Related articles

Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage

Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery

The efficacy of Interceed(TC7)* for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group

Transcervical tubal cannulation, past, present, and future