Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (+/- standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 +/- 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of "in" or "out" of phase in 22% of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22% to 39% depending on the clinical setting.
endometrial biopsy dating variability, luteal phase defect diagnosis accuracy, interobserver variation endometrial histology, endometrial dating pathologist disagreement, luteal phase deficiency diagnostic criteria, endometrial biopsy interpretation reliability, histologic dating menstrual cycle, LPD diagnosis standardization, progesterone deficiency endometrial assessment, luteal phase support when to treat, endometrial biopsy timing luteal phase, pathology dating endometrium reproducibility
Cite this article
Scott, R. T., Snyder, R. R., Strickland, Sr., D. M., Tyburski, C. C., Bagnall, J. A., Reed, K. R., Adair, C. A., & Hensley, S. B. (1988). The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. *Fertility and sterility*, *50*(6), 888-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9
Scott RT, Snyder RR, Strickland, Sr. DM, Tyburski CC, Bagnall JA, Reed KR, et al. The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. Fertil Steril. 1988;50(6):888-892. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9
Scott, Richard T., et al. "The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 50, no. 6, 1988, pp. 888-892.
Five regularly menstruating women of proven fertility, with normal prolactin and thyroid function studies, underwent a total of 39 endometrial biopsies (EMBs). The slides were dated in blinded fashion...
OBJECTIVE: To compare the expression of endometrial P receptors (PR) levels with markers of endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation.
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study to examin...
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether color flow pulsed Doppler analysis of corpus luteum blood flow in normal cycles differs from cycles with a luteal phase defect.
DESIGN: A prospective study of natural...