Byun, J., Peterson, C. M., Backonja, U., Taylor, R. N., Stanford, J. B., Allen-Brady, K. L., Smith, K. R., Louis, G. M. B., & Schliep, K. C. (2020). Adiposity and Endometriosis Severity and Typology. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 27(7), 1516-1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.002
Byun J, Peterson CM, Backonja U, Taylor RN, Stanford JB, Allen-Brady KL, et al. Adiposity and Endometriosis Severity and Typology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(7):1516-1523. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.002
Byun, J., et al. "Adiposity and Endometriosis Severity and Typology." Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, vol. 27, no. 7, 2020, pp. 1516-1523.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development04byxyr05
Division of Public Health Department of Family and Preventive Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah034de1n65
Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
Abstract
Objective
Prior research has collectively shown that endometriosis is inversely related to women's adiposity. The aim of this study was to assess whether this inverse relationship holds true by disease severity and typology.
Design
Cross-sectional study among women with no prior diagnosis of endometriosis.
Setting
Fourteen clinical centers in Salt Lake City, UT, and San Francisco, CA.
Patients
A total of 495 women (of which 473 were analyzed), aged 18-44 years, were enrolled in the operative cohort of the Endometriosis, Natural History, Diagnosis, and Outcomes (ENDO) Study.
Interventions
Gynecologic laparoscopy/laparotomy regardless of clinical indication.
Measurements and Main Results
Participants underwent anthropometric assessments, body composition measurements, and evaluations of body fat distribution ratios before surgery. Surgeons completed a standardized operative report immediately after surgery to capture revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine staging (I-IV) and typology of disease (superficial endometriosis [SE], ovarian endometrioma [OE], and deep infiltrating endometriosis [DIE]). Linear mixed models, taking into account within-clinical-center correlation, were used to generate least square means (95% confidence intervals) to assess differences in adiposity measures by endometriosis stage (no endometriosis, I-IV) and typology (no endometriosis, SE, DIE, OE, OE + DIE) adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and parity. Although most confidence intervals were wide and overlapping, 3 general impressions emerged: (1) women with incident endometriosis had the lowest anthropometric/body composition indicators compared with those without incident endometriosis, (2) women with stage I or IV endometriosis had lower indicators compared with women with stage II or III, and (3) women with OE and/or DIE tended to have the lowest indicators, whereas women with SE had the highest indicators.
Conclusion
Our research highlights that the relationship between women's adiposity and endometriosis severity and typology may be more complicated than prior research indicates.
By this author
Diagnostic Criteria and Classification · Terminology and Definitions
Minjeur M et al., 2026·Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine·Free to read
Infertility is a clinical condition that is recognized by the symptom of an inability to conceive through sexual intercourse or to sustain a pregnancy, with that symptom indicating underlying male and/or female pathology.
This definition of infertility was developed through a structured, consensus-informed process involving broad stakeholder engagement. Initially, multiple definitions currently used by various medical professional organizations were reviewed, and a definition document was drafted and submitted to the Board of Directors of the International Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine (IIRRM). All IIRRM members were invited to provide feedback on the draft. Approximately 2,500 individuals and 44 organizations from 92 countries were then invited to review the proposed document, representing clinical, scientific, patient, policy, and advocacy perspectives. Submitted comments were reviewed thematically, with suggested revisions evaluated for clarity, clinical relevance, inclusiveness, and consistency with contemporary restorative reproductive medicine. Following this review, 3 substantive changes, 18 minor changes, and 15 citation corrections were incorporated into the final draft which resulted in a revised definition intended to better reflect the medical, social, and practical realities of modern infertility evaluation and care. Final approval by the IIRRM Board of Directors was unanimous.
Kahn LG et al., 2026·JAMA Network Open·Free full text on PubMed Central
Increasing numbers of children are conceived using infertility treatment; concerns remain about potential effects on child neurodevelopment. To evaluate whether infertility treatment is associated with child neurodevelopment and whether such an association may be attributable to underlying subfecundity. DESIGN, SETTING, This cohort study was conducted among mother-child dyads in the National Institutes of Health Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort, with infants conceived between 1998 and 2022. Associations of subfecundity and infertility treatment with neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed among children ages 2 to 10 years. Data were analyzed from May 14, 2025, to March 31, 2026. Subfecundity was defined as prior consultation for, treatment of, or diagnosis of infertility for either partner; at least 2 prior miscarriages; or ever having had unprotected heterosexual intercourse for 12 months without conceiving. Infertility treatment was categorized as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or non-IVF treatment. Harmonized caregiver responses to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist yielded continuous raw scores for externalizing and internalizing problems. The total raw Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) score quantified autism-like symptoms. Caregivers reported physician diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Among 15 382 mother-infant dyads, there were 14 191 unique maternal participants (mean [SD] age at delivery, 30.9 [5.33] years; 8780 parous participants [57.1%]). ASD and ADHD were diagnosed in 876 offspring (7.6%) and 819 offspring (7.1%), respectively. In generalized linear models, subfecundity was associated with higher externalizing problem and SRS scores among all pregnancies (externalizing problems: b = 0.47 [95% CI, 0.14-0.81]; SRS score: b = 1.08 [95% CI, 0.01-2.14]) and when restricted to natural conceptions (externalizing problems: b = 0.45 [95% CI, 0.07-0.83]; SRS score: b = 1.12 [95% CI, -0.09 to 2.34]). Offspring of parents with subfecundity had higher odds of ASD (overall: odds ratio [OR], 1.27 [95% CI, 1.03-1.57]; natural conceptions: OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.04-1.64]). Children conceived via non-IVF treatment had higher odds of ADHD compared with those conceived via natural conception with subfecundity (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.16-2.68]) or without subfecundity (OR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.05-2.25]). There were no significant associations for IVF treatment. In this large US cohort study, subfecundity was associated with elevated scores for caregiver-reported symptoms of behavioral problems and higher odds of ASD diagnosis, independent of infertility treatment. Non-IVF treatment was associated with ADHD, warranting further research into specific indications for treatment that may increase risk of offspring neurodevelopmental problems.
Stanford JB et al., 2026·Frontiers in Reproductive Health·Free full text on PubMed Central
Background The total fertility rate (TFR) in most developed countries has been declining for decades. In the United States (U.S.), the total fertility rate has remained below replacement level since 2007. Subfertility affects at least 15% of women or couples over their reproductive lifespan and contributes to reduced TFR. Restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) is a medically based approach to subfertility care that can be delivered in primary care settings to increase live birth rates. Objective To estimate the theoretical impact of use of RRM among subfertile couples in the United States. Methods We conducted a simulation study. Model inputs included the number of women of reproductive age in the United States by 5-year age groups; current age-specific and total fertility rates; the proportion of women in each age group with subfertility; estimated spontaneous live birth rates among women with subfertility; and age-specific crude live birth rates with RRM treatment. We evaluated fifteen scenarios including sensitivity analyses: two different varying assumptions for spontaneous conception (25% vs. 50%), two levels of RRM utilization among subfertile women (20% vs. 50%), three different estimates of the number of subfertile women who would be potentially eligible for RRM treatment, and 4 different levels of effectiveness (live birth) from RRM treatment. Results The baseline TFR in the United States was 1.77 during 2015-2019, and 13.5% of women ages 20-44 were estimated to have subfertility. In a conservative scenario (50% spontaneous births; 20% RRM utilization; married women trying to conceive for at least 12 months, 20.7% RRM live births), the TFR increased to 1.79, representing a 1.0% relative increase (absolute +0.02). In an optimistic scenario (25% spontaneous births; 50% RRM utilization; all subfertile women), the TFR increased to 2.02, a 14.5% relative increase (absolute +0.26), approaching replacement-level fertility. Conclusion Simulation results suggest that expanding access to RRM within primary care settings could meaningfully increase the U.S. TFR, by reducing unresolved subfertility. Realizing this potential would require policy and health system changes to address workforce capacity, insurance coverage, and equitable access. These findings underscore the potential contribution of non-IVF fertility care pathways in addressing population-level fertility decline.
Apelian S et al., 2026·Gynecologic and obstetric investigation
Dysmenorrhea is a debilitating symptom in patients with endometriosis, contributing significantly to disease burden. While the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and dysmenorrhea in these patients is unclear, emerging evidence suggests BMI may be correlated with pain in the presence of endometriosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between BMI and dysmenorrhea in women with endometriosis. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to November 15, 2024. Eligible studies for this review included original observational articles reporting outcomes related to the prevalence of dysmenorrhea in relation to body weight in patients with confirmed endometriosis. Data for a two-way contingency table were extracted from the articles, and odds ratios (ORs) for the association between BMI categories and dysmenorrhea were calculated. These individual ORs were pooled using a random-effects model. Six studies involving 2,274 women with endometriosis were included. The meta-analysis revealed that underweight individuals with endometriosis had significantly higher odds of experiencing dysmenorrhea compared to non-underweight patients (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.80, I² = 0.00%) or to those with normal weight (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.83, I² = 0.00%). No significant association was found between dysmenorrhea and overweight or obese individuals. Sensitivity analyses showed variability in the findings based on the exclusion of certain studies. No publication bias was detected in the analysis. There was an association between underweight status and dysmenorrhea in endometriosis. We speculate that managing weight and nutrition may be useful in mitigating dysmenorrhea symptoms. However, due to the study limitations, prospective trials are needed to test the ability of diet to alleviate pain.
Schliep KC et al., 2025·F S Rep·Free full text on PubMed Central
To determine whether endometriosis typology, namely ovarian endometriomas (OE), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), or superficial endometriosis (SE), correlates with fertility history.
Prospective cohort.
One of fourteen surgical centers in Salt Lake City, Utah (n = 5) or San Francisco, California (n = 9). A total of 473 women (18-44 years) with no prior endometriosis diagnosis, undergoing laparoscopies/laparotomies, irrespective of indication, in Utah or California (2007-2009). Exposure: Incident endometriosis. Before surgery, we queried women about time to become pregnant for prior planned pregnancies. Generalized linear models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for association between endometriosis typology and infertility, defined as having ever tried >12 months (>6 months for women ≥35 years) to get pregnant. We also generated fecundability odds ratios (aFOR) to capture time to pregnancy. Twenty-five percent (n = 116) of women were diagnosed with SE only, 5% (n = 23) with OE, 6% (n = 29) with DIE, and 5% (n = 22) with OE + DIE, and 60% (n = 283) with no endometriosis. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with SE had a 1.58 higher aPR (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.14), although women with OE and/or DIE had a 2.41 higher aPR for subfertility after adjusting for women's age, body mass index, and site. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with OE and/or DIE had a 53% lower historic fecundability (aFOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.95); however, no association was found among women with SE (aFOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.49-1.33). Specific endometriosis typologies may be associated with fecundability, with OE and/or DIE associated with nearly a 150% higher prevalence of subfertility and over a 50% lower historic fecundability.
Individuals with endometriosis, a gynecologic condition affecting approximately 11% of people with a uterus, may have an elevated risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. However, the mechanisms underlying this association are not well understood. We investigated the association between incident endometriosis diagnosis, staging, and typology and lipid biomarkers measured at time of diagnostic surgery among women participating in the NICHD ENDO study (n=395). Endometriosis was categorized using the American Society for Reproductive Medicine staging (I−IV). Endometriosis typology was defined by lesion depth and location and categorized as superficial endometriosis (SE), ovarian endometrioma (OE), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DE). With no endometriosis as our reference, we evaluated the associations between endometriosis diagnosis, stage (I/II vs III/IV), and typology (SE, OE, DE, OE+DE) and dyslipidemia using standard clinical thresholds (total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) <50 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥100 mg/dL, triglycerides ≥175 mg/dL, non-HDL ≥130 mg/dL, VLDL ≥30 mg/dL, Apolipoprotein A-1 (APO-A1) <125 mg/dL, Apolipoprotein B (APOB) ≥120 mg/dL; APOB/APO-A1 ratio >0.78). We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% CIs via generalized linear models, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, marital status, BMI, income (poverty level), and serum cotinine as a marker of smoking. At the time of gynecologic surgery, individuals were mean 32 years (SD: 7 years), non-Hispanic white (79%), married (71%), and mean BMI 28 (SD=8). While we found no differences in endometriosis diagnosis or endometriosis staging and dyslipidemia (
Figure 1; Table 1
), a pattern emerged regarding endometriosis typology (
Table 2
). Women with OE+DE, compared to no endometriosis, had increased prevalence of dyslipidemia: total cholesterol >200 mg/dL: 1.87 (0.99, 3.57); triglycerides
>
175 mg/dL: 2.48 (1.34, 4.57); VLDL ≥30 mg/dL: 2.08 (1.28, 3.38); and APOB mg/dL ≥120: 2.86 (1.22, 6.66). OE appeared to be driving this association. SE was not associated with dyslipidemia. The association between endometriosis, especially of more severe typology, and subsequent CVD may be through dyslipidemia, which may be detectable at the time of endometriosis diagnosis. Further research in larger, more representative samples is needed before definitive conclusions can be made.
Schliep KC et al., 2026·J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod·Free full text on PubMed Central
Endometriosis has been linked to cardiometabolic alterations, but whether these associations vary by disease severity or phenotype is unclear. We examined lipid profiles across endometriosis diagnosis, stage, and typology. Data came from 476 women in the NICHD ENDO cohort. Endometriosis was confirmed laparoscopically and staged using the rASRM criteria (I-IV). Typology was categorized as superficial endometriosis (SE), ovarian endometrioma (OE), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DE), and OE+DE. We compared endometriosis status, stage (I/II vs III/IV), and typology to no endometriosis using adverse lipid thresholds (total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL, HDL <50 mg/dL, LDL ≥100 mg/dL, triglycerides ≥175 mg/dL, non-HDL ≥130 mg/dL, VLDL ≥30 mg/dL, ApoA1 <125 mg/dL, and ApoB ≥120 mg/dL). Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95 % CIs were estimated via generalized linear models, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, income, marital status, and serum cotinine. Endometriosis diagnosis alone was not associated with adverse lipid profiles. In contrast, moderate/severe disease showed higher prevalence of elevated triglycerides (aPR= 2.27; 95 % CI: 1.18,4.35) and VLDL (aPR= 2.41; 95 % CI: 1.50, 3.85). Typology revealed stronger patterns: OE and OE+DE were associated with adverse profiles across multiple markers (aPRs 1.59-4.09), particularly ApoB and triglycerides. Minimal/mild disease and SE were not associated. The metabolic signal was phenotype-driven rather than diagnosis-driven, with severe stage and OE/OE+DE showing clear associations with adverse lipid profiles. These findings suggest lipid profiles may serve as markers of phenotype severity or shared biological milieu. Replication in larger cohorts is needed.
C Matthew Peterson, Uba Backonja, Joseph B Stanford, Ken R Smith, Germaine M Buck Louis, Jiyoung Byun, Karen C Schliep, Robert N Taylor
U Backonja, Joe Stanford, Joey Stanford, J Stanford, Kenneth Smith, K Smith, G Louis, J Byun, K Schliep, Bob Taylor, Rob Taylor, Bobby Taylor, R Taylor
PMID 31927045 31927045 DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.002 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.002 Byun et al. 2020, Byun 2020
Cite this article
Byun, J., Peterson, C. M., Backonja, U., Taylor, R. N., Stanford, J. B., Allen-Brady, K. L., Smith, K. R., Louis, G. M. B., & Schliep, K. C. (2020). Adiposity and Endometriosis Severity and Typology. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 27(7), 1516-1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.002
Byun J, Peterson CM, Backonja U, Taylor RN, Stanford JB, Allen-Brady KL, et al. Adiposity and Endometriosis Severity and Typology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(7):1516-1523. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.002
Byun, J., et al. "Adiposity and Endometriosis Severity and Typology." Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, vol. 27, no. 7, 2020, pp. 1516-1523.