The Standard Days Method (SDM) is a method of family planning that assumes ovulation to be close to the midpoint of the menstrual cycle; fertility falls between days 8 and 19; and is most effective for cycle lengths between twenty-six and thirty-two days. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the assumptions of the SDM with a new data set of 714 menstrual cycles produced by 131 women (mean age twenty-nine) who tracked their fertility with an electronic fertility monitor that measured urinary estrogen and luteinizing hormone (LH). The LH peak was used to estimate the day of ovulation (EDO) and the six-day fertile window. Results indicated the majority (80 percent) of menstrual cycles had EDOs within three days of the midpoint of the cycle (86 percent with cycle lengths between twenty-six and thirty-two days). Approximately 22.5 percent (172) of the cycles had fertile window days outside of days 8 to 19, 10.2 percent (78) before, and 12.1 percent (92) after. However, there is a low probability of pregnancy when women experience short cycles and the early days of the fertile window are outside of days 8 through 19. We concluded assumptions of the SDM outside of the fertile window with long cycles could be problematic. However, the SDM is valid for women who have most cycles within the twenty-six to thirty-two day range.
Standard Days Method efficacy, SDM family planning evaluation, fertility awareness method statistics, calendar-based family planning, CycleBeads contraception, fixed fertile window method, family planning method effectiveness, natural contraception efficacy, cycle day fertility window, SDM typical use effectiveness
PMID 30082989 30082989 DOI 10.1179/002436312804827064 10.1179/002436312804827064
Cite this article
Schneider, M., & Fehring, R. J. (2012). Descriptive Statistical Evaluation of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning. *The Linacre Quarterly*, *79*(4), 460-473. https://doi.org/10.1179/002436312804827064
Schneider M, Fehring RJ. Descriptive Statistical Evaluation of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning. Linacre Q. 2012;79(4):460-473. doi:10.1179/002436312804827064
Schneider, M., and R. J. Fehring. "Descriptive Statistical Evaluation of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning." *The Linacre Quarterly*, vol. 79, no. 4, 2012, pp. 460-473.
Porucznik CA et al., 2016
Open Access
Environmental Health : a Global Access Science Source
BACKGROUND: To examine transient environmental exposures and their relationship with human fecundity, exposure assessment should occur optimally at the time of conception in both members of the couple...
Ecochard R et al., 2008
Open Access
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E
BACKGROUND: To assess the amount of variability in ovarian follicular growth rate and maximum follicular diameter related to different centers, women and cycles of the same women in a multicenter obse...
Tingen C et al., 2003
Open Access
Environmental Health Perspectives
Although there has been growing concern about the effects of environmental exposures on human fertility, standard epidemiologic study designs may not collect sufficient data to identify subtle effects...
The uses of cervical mucus and basal body temperature as indicators of return to fertility postpartum have resulted in high unintended pregnancy rates. In 2013, a study found that when women used urin...