To assess the impact of a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) tool for fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) of family planning.
Methods
Clinicians familiar with at least one FABM were randomly invited to participate in a prospective cross-over study to compare usual practice to the use of the SDM tool when discussing FABMs with patients. Patients completed surveys preand post-office visit and six months later. The primary outcome explored the effect of online education on use of the SDM tool on clinicians' knowledge of FABMs.
Results
Of 278 clinicians contacted, 54% could not be reached, and 15% did not provide women's health services. The 26 clinicians enrolled were experienced, with more than half recommending FABMs for ≥10 years, and 73% recommending more than one FABM to patients. Knowledge scores significantly improved after online training and use of the SDM tool (baseline mean score = 9.54 (scale of 0-12); post-training mean score = 10.73, p < 0.002).
Conclusions
Education about FABMs and training on use of the SDM tool improved knowledge scores even among an experienced cohort of clinicians. INNOVATION: The novel SDM tool can better equip clinicians to meet the rising patient interest in FABMs.
Duane, M., Martinez, V., Berry, M., & Manhart, M. D. (2023). Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge. *PEC innovation*, *1*, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100061
Duane M, Martinez V, Berry M, Manhart MD. Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge. PEC Innov. 2023;1:100061. doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100061
Duane, M., et al. "Evaluation of a fertility awareness-based shared decision-making tool part 1: Study design and impact on clinician knowledge." *PEC innovation*, vol. 1, 2023, pp. 100061.
Kelly PJ et al., 2012Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
INTRODUCTION: Natural family planning (NFP) methods are effective for contraception with proper and consistent use. However, only 1% of patients at federally funded Title X family planning clinics sel...
RRM Methods > General FABM > TeachingBody Literacy > Education > Professional TrainingBody Literacy > Patient Empowerment > Informed Decision-Making
Choi J et al., 2010Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal D'obstetrique Et Gynecologie Du Canada : JOGC
OBJECTIVE: To assess physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice with respect to four evidence-based natural family planning (NFP) methods: Standard Days, cervical mucus, basal body temperature, an...
RRM Methods > General FABM > TeachingRRM Methods > General FABM > Clinical OutcomesBody Literacy > Education > Professional Training
Arévalo M, 1997Advances in Contraception : the Official Journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception
Despite the recognized benefits for clients and programs of providing natural family planning (NFP) services, few family planning programs offer NFP and few provide fertility awareness education. Furt...
RRM Methods > General FABM > TeachingBody Literacy > Education > Professional TrainingBody Literacy > Patient Empowerment > Informed Decision-Making
Perinatal health professionals are in key positions to either promote or dissuade the use of Natural Family Planning (NFP). The purpose of this article is to describe a survey conducted with perinatal...
Body Literacy > Education > Professional TrainingRRM Methods > General FABM > TeachingBody Literacy > Patient Empowerment > Informed Decision-Making