Despite the recognized benefits for clients and programs of providing natural family planning (NFP) services, few family planning programs offer NFP and few provide fertility awareness education. Furthermore, many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that provide only NFP actually reach a very small percentage of the potential NFP users in the areas they serve. This paper discusses the results of interviews with selected family planning providers that were conducted to explore reasons why NFP and fertility awareness education are not offered in their programs, and with NFP providers to get their opinions on how to improve service delivery. The interviews were structured around some of the lessons learned from the successful incorporation of the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) into several multimethod family planning programs. There is agreement that the need for NFP services* is far from being met and that most clients lack the information and skills they could learn through fertility awareness education. The providers interviewed also acknowledged that offering these services would improve the quality of reproductive health services in general. Presented here are some ideas about why these services are not offered, as well as suggestions for integrating NFP and fertility awareness education into existing family planning programs.
natural family planning service delivery barriers providers, NFP integration family planning programs provider perspectives, fertility awareness education reproductive health services, Arévalo natural family planning service availability, lactational amenorrhea method LAM integration multimethod programs, NFP non-governmental organizations service delivery improvement, fertility awareness education quality reproductive health, natural family planning underutilization provider barriers, NFP service expansion developing countries family planning, integrating NFP existing family planning programs strategies
PMID 9288346 9288346 DOI 10.1023/a:1006524609832 10.1023/a:1006524609832 Arévalo et al. 1997, Arévalo 1997
Cite this article
Arévalo, M. (1997). Expanding the availability and improving delivery of natural family planning services and fertility awareness education: providers' perspectives. Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, 13(2-3), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006524609832
Arévalo M. Expanding the availability and improving delivery of natural family planning services and fertility awareness education: providers' perspectives. Adv Contracept. 1997;13(2-3):275-281. doi:10.1023/a:1006524609832
Arévalo, Marcos. "Expanding the availability and improving delivery of natural family planning services and fertility awareness education: providers' perspectives." Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, vol. 13, no. 2-3, 1997, pp. 275-281.
Related articles
Guidelines by Clinical Area · Fertility and Infertility Guidelines
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2025·Fertility and sterility
It has been estimated that only a quarter of persons with infertility in the United States can sufficiently access infertility care. Against this backdrop of disparity, specific populations, including persons of color, sexual and gender minorities, immigrants, and lower-income persons, face barriers that further constrain access to care. This document outlines these communities' barriers and reviews best practice recommendations to extend inclusive access to care for marginalized populations. This reference is intended to support health professionals with knowledge of barriers that limit access to care and to provide practical strategies to improve access and optimize healthcare delivery.
Plain Language This study quantifies losses and gains of obstetric care services at US rural and urban short-term acute care hospitals between 2010 and 2022.
Infertility impacts millions of people of reproductive age worldwide, with approximately 10–15% of couples affected. When infertility is present, there are many potential barriers to treatment, leading to inequity of access. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are the mainstay of medical treatment for infertility and include procedures such as in vitro fertilisation. This scoping review aims to explore the barriers to accessing assisted reproductive technologies to highlight a potential role for the pharmacist in addressing these barriers. Five databases, including CINAHL, Emcare, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched using keywords that resulted in 19 studies that explored barriers to initially accessing or continuing ART. Studies identified more than one barrier to accessing ART, with the most mentioned barrier being the geographic location of the patient, with others themed as psychological, financial, minority groups, educational level, and the age of the patient. Recommendations were made to address barriers to accessing ART, which included changes to government regulations to increase health education and promotion of infertility. Pharmacists’ accessibility, even in geographically remote locations, places them in an ideal position to address many of the challenges experienced by people accessing infertility treatment to improve outcomes for these people.
Hariton E et al., 2023·Fertility and Sterility·
Open Access
The field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) is at a crossroads; there is a mismatch between demand for reproductive endocrinology, infertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART) services, and availability of care. This document's focus is to provide data justifying the critical need for increased provision of fertility services in the United States now and into the future, offer approaches to rectify the developing physician shortage problem, and suggest a framework for the discussion on how to meet that increase in demand. The Society of REI recommend the following: 1. Our field should aggressively explore and implement courses of action to increase the number of qualified, highly trained REI physicians trained annually. We recommend efforts to increase the number of REI fellowships and the size complement of existing fellowships be prioritized where possible. These courses of action include: a. Increase the number of REI fellowship training programs. b. Increase the number of fellows trained at current REI fellowship programs. c. The pros and cons of a 2-year focused clinical fellowship track for fellows interested primarily in ART practice were extensively explored. We do not recommend shortening the REI fellowship to 2 years at this time, because efforts should be focused on increasing the number of fellowship training slots (1a and b). 2. It is recommended that the field aggressively implements courses of action to increase the number of and appropriate usage of non-REI providers to increase clinical efficiency under appropriate board-certified REI physician supervision. 3. Automating processes through technologic improvements can free providers at all levels to practice at the top of their license.