to study the results in patients undergoing infertility treatment with a focus on restorative medicine (NaProTechnology) at a department of obstetrics and gynecology. Methodology: retrospective cohort study conducted by the gynecology and obstetrics department at Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile) in infertility patients from a suburban area of Santiago de Chile, who received treatment between 2006 and 2014. All couples received instructions on how to recognize their fertility period according to a local teaching model based on the Creighton Model FertilityCare System. They also received medical treatment to induce ovulation and/or widen their fertile period, or surgical treatment. The main outcome was the number of pregnancies.
Results
131 patients received instructions. The mean age was 33.6 years. Seventyeight patients (59.5%) consulted due to primary infertility; 53 (40.5%) due to secondary infertility. The duration of group infertility was 4.1 years. The mean use of the method was 12.6 months (median, 9 months). The infertility causes identified included anovulation (50.4%), tubo-peritoneal factors (18.3%), endometriosis (14.5%), uterine factors (9.2%), cervical factors (8.4%) and masculine factors (19.1%). There were 33 pregnancies (25.2 global). The crude proportion of pregnancies at 24 months was 22.9% and the proportion adjusted by the life table at 24 months was 40 per 100 couples.
Conclusions
the focus on restorative medicine is effective to achieve pregnancy but it requires a long-term longitudinal treatment. Early discontinuation of fertility charting affects the efficacy of this focus. More research is warranted to optimize medical treatment.
napro technology chile outcomes, creighton model infertility treatment, fertility charting for infertility, restorative reproductive medicine pregnancy rates, ovulation induction natural family planning, anovulation treatment fertility awareness, endometriosis infertility restorative approach, tubal factor infertility medical treatment, fertility awareness based methods infertility, naprotechnology effectiveness pregnancy, cervical mucus monitoring infertility diagnosis, luteal phase support natural cycles
Cite this article
Arraztoa, J. A., Donoso, M. B., Figueroa, H., Bustos, B., Valdivieso, J., Maella, X., & Gana, M. T. (1900). *Experiencia preliminar en el uso del registro de fertilidad en una cohorte de pacientes de infertilidad en un servicio de ginecología y obstetricia*.
Arraztoa JA, Donoso MB, Figueroa H, Bustos B, Valdivieso J, Maella X, et al. Experiencia preliminar en el uso del registro de fertilidad en una cohorte de pacientes de infertilidad en un servicio de ginecología y obstetricia. 1900.
Arraztoa, José Antonio, et al. *Experiencia preliminar en el uso del registro de fertilidad en una cohorte de pacientes de infertilidad en un servicio de ginecología y obstetricia*. 1900.
Stanford JB et al., 2022
Open Access
Human Reproduction Open
STUDY QUESTION: What is the feasibility of a prospective protocol to follow subfertile couples being treated with natural procreative technology for up to 3 years at multiple clinical sites?
SUMMARY...
Kicińska AM et al., 2023
Open Access
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of anovulatory infertility. Absent, impaired, or rare ovulation induces progesterone deficiency in the luteal phase, which is a critical probl...
Najmabadi S et al., 2022
Open Access
Human Reproduction Open
STUDY QUESTION: Does sexual intercourse enhance the cycle fecundability in women without known subfertility?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Sexual intercourse (regardless of timing during the cycle) was associated...
Boyle PC et al., 2022
Open Access
Journal of Medical Case Reports
BACKGROUND: Restorative reproductive medicine represents a comprehensive approach to subfertility (infertility and miscarriage) with investigations, diagnoses, and treatments combined with fertility c...