To equip the reader with the tools necessary to evaluate studies of natural family planning (NFP) effectiveness found in the literature and to make recommendations for future NFP effectiveness studies.
Design
Current standards to evaluate contraceptive method effectiveness are reviewed. A framework for evaluating reports on NFP is presented.
Results
Most NFP studies found in the literature are flawed in design and do not calculate pregnancy rates correctly. The results from the few well-designed studies are presented.
Discussion
Many factors influence NFP effectiveness, and these factors must be considered when evaluating published studies and designing future studies.
natural family planning effectiveness rates, fertility awareness method study design, NFP pregnancy rate calculation methodology, evaluating FABM effectiveness research, life table analysis natural family planning, typical use perfect use fertility awareness, contraceptive effectiveness NFP standards, methodological flaws fertility awareness studies, assessing natural family planning research quality, pearl index natural family planning
Cite this article
Lamprecht, V., & Trussell, J. (1997). Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports. *Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception*, *13*(2-3), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006595703472
Lamprecht V, Trussell J. Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports. Adv Contracept. 1997;13(2-3):155-165. doi:10.1023/a:1006595703472
Lamprecht, V., and J. Trussell. "Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports." *Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception*, vol. 13, no. 2-3, 1997, pp. 155-165.
Background and PurposePublished reports indicate that over 100 million women worldwide use the birth control pill (Oral Contraceptives, or OCPs).1,2 However, in a national study conducted by the Batte...
RRM Methods > General FABM > EffectivenessContraception/Comparison > FABM vs Hormonal > EffectivenessContraception/Comparison > Effectiveness > Typical Use
Background: The aim was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. STUDY Design: Six hundred and sixty-seven women and th...
RRM Methods > General FABM > ComparisonRRM Methods > General FABM > EffectivenessBody Literacy > Charting Instruction > Digital Tools
Bonnar J et al., 1997Advances in Contraception : the Official Journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception
A pilot study was conducted in Ireland to test the effectiveness of the calendar method of contraception. A conservative rule was used, requiring on average 16 days of abstinence per cycle. Among the ...
RRM Methods > General FABM > EffectivenessRRM Methods > General FABM > Clinical OutcomesContraception/Comparison > Effectiveness > Typical Use