Red light improves spermatozoa motility and does not induce oxidative DNA damage

  • University of California, Irvine ROR
  • Zoological Society of San Diego ROR
  • Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
  • University of California, San Diego ROR

Scientific Reports, 7(1), 46480

DOI 10.1038/srep46480 PMID 28425485

Abstract

The ability to successfully fertilize ova relies upon the swimming ability of spermatozoa. Both in humans and in animals, sperm motility has been used as a metric for the viability of semen samples. Recently, several studies have examined the efficacy of low dosage red light exposure for cellular repair and increasing sperm motility. Of prime importance to the practical application of this technique is the absence of DNA damage caused by radiation exposure. In this study, we examine the effect of 633 nm coherent, red laser light on sperm motility using a novel wavelet-based algorithm that allows for direct measurement of curvilinear velocity under red light illumination. This new algorithm gives results comparable to the standard computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system. We then assess the safety of red light treatment of sperm by analyzing, (1) the levels of double-strand breaks in the DNA, and (2) oxidative damage in the sperm DNA. The results demonstrate that for the parameters used there are insignificant differences in oxidative DNA damage as a result of irradiation.

Topics

red light sperm motility, photobiomodulation spermatozoa, low-level light therapy sperm, LED irradiation sperm function, oxidative DNA damage sperm light, sperm motility enhancement therapy, photostimulation semen quality, red light wavelength sperm viability, non-invasive sperm treatment, light therapy male fertility
PMID 28425485 28425485 DOI 10.1038/srep46480 10.1038/srep46480

Cite this article

Preece, D., Chow, K. W., Gomez‐Godinez, V., Gustafson, K., Esener, S., Ravida N, Durrant, B., & Berns, M. (2017). Red light improves spermatozoa motility and does not induce oxidative DNA damage. *Scientific reports*, *7*(1), 46480. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46480

Related articles