Reply of the authors: "Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"" by Frank-Herrmann et al
restorative reproductive medicine reproductive autonomy informed consent, Peipert BJ fertility awareness method education debate, reproductive choice family planning informed consent ethical considerations, body literacy education reproductive health decision-making, fertility awareness-based methods clinical practice guidelines, informed consent fertility treatment options comparison, reproductive autonomy natural family planning methods, fertility education medical training curriculum
Cite this article
Stanford, J. B., Parnell, T. A., & Minjeur, M. (2026). *Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"*. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.014
Stanford JB, Parnell TA, Minjeur M. Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent". 2026. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.014
Stanford, J. B., et al. *Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"*. 2026.
ObjectiveTo examine birth outcomes between children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and sibling births from unassisted conceptions.DesignRetrospective si...
Infertility > Assisted Reproductive Technology > IVF OutcomesPregnancy > Neonatal Outcomes > Birth Weight and Gestational AgeContraception/Comparison > ART vs Natural Conception > Sibling Studies