Reply of the authors: “Response to “The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent”” by Stanford et al
Cite this paper
Peipert, B. J., Kuhlman, J. T., & Feinberg, E. C. (2026). Reply of the authors: “Response to “The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent”” by Stanford et al. Fertility and Sterility, 125(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.019
Peipert BJ, Kuhlman JT, Feinberg EC. Reply of the authors: “Response to “The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent”” by Stanford et al. Fertility and Sterility. 2026;125(1):178. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.019
Peipert, Benjamin J., et al. "Reply of the authors: “Response to “The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent”” by Stanford et al." Fertility and Sterility, vol. 125, no. 1, 2026, pp. 178.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
Open-access status not yet checked.
Author affiliations
3 institutions- University of Pennsylvania
00b30xv10 - Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 000e0be47
- Tennessee Department of Education 00dwsfp88
Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
