Reply of the authors: "Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"" by Frank-Herrmann et al

Peipert BJ, Kuhlman JT, Feinberg EC

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029

Fertility and sterility, 125(1), 180, 2026

Reply of the authors: "Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"" by Frank-Herrmann et al

Benjamin J. Peipert , Eve C. Feinberg , Joseph B Stanford

Author affiliations (6)

University of Pennsylvania ROR
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. ROR
University of Utah ROR
Tennessee Department of Education ROR
Radiant Research (United States) ROR
University of British Columbia ROR

Hostile to restorative reproductive medicine

DOI10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029 PMID41475701

Read at source

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

Ethics/Philosophy > Informed Consent > Fertility Treatment Options Body Literacy > Education > Provider Training and Practice RRM Methods > Philosophy > Reproductive Autonomy

restorative reproductive medicine reproductive autonomy informed consent, Peipert BJ fertility awareness method education debate, reproductive choice family planning informed consent ethical considerations, body literacy education reproductive health decision-making, fertility awareness-based methods clinical practice guidelines, informed consent fertility treatment options comparison, reproductive autonomy natural family planning methods, fertility education medical training curriculum

PMID 41475701 41475701 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029

Cite this article

Stanford, J. B., Parnell, T. A., & Minjeur, M. (2026). *Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"*. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.014

Reply of the authors: "Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"" by Frank-Herrmann et al

Abstract

Topics

Cite this article

Related articles

Recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion

Neonatal characteristics of children conceived with in vitro fertilization or intrauterine insemination compared with sibling births from unassisted conceptions

Disordered eating behaviors during adolescence and risk of endometriosis: a prospective cohort study

"Reply of the authors: ""Response to ""The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates informed consent for infertility treatment"""""