Surgeon Subspecialty and Ovarian Preservation in Endometrioma Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Billow M, Clay J, Newark A, Yao M, AlHilli M, Kho RM

Published November 2026 J Minim Invasive Gynecol
DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.036 PMID 41571147

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate variation in ovarian preservation and excision of extra-ovarian endometriosis during endometrioma surgery across gynecologic subspecialties.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

One tertiary academic medical center and four regional hospitals within a single health system.

Participants

Individuals aged 18 to 45 years who underwent surgery for pathology-confirmed ovarian endometrioma between 2012 and 2024. Exclusion criteria included hereditary cancer syndromes, prior malignancy, malignancy on final pathology, nongynecologic surgeons, and incomplete documentation. The final cohort comprised 351 patients.

Interventions

Surgical management was assessed across four gynecologic subspecialties: general obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS), reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI), and gynecologic oncology. The primary outcome was ovarian-sparing surgery, defined as cystectomy without oophorectomy. The secondary outcome was excision of extra-ovarian endometriosis among patients with advanced-stage disease (revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage III or IV). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for clinical and surgical factors.

Results

Ovarian-sparing surgery was performed in 66% of cases and varied by surgeon subspecialty. Compared with OB/GYN surgeons, MIGS and REI surgeons had higher odds of ovarian-sparing surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.07-23.29 and aOR 8.44, 95% CI 2.71-26.27, respectively; both p < .001). Among patients with advanced-stage disease, excision of extra-ovarian endometriosis also differed by subspecialty, with MIGS and REI surgeons demonstrating higher odds of extra-ovarian excision compared with OB/GYN surgeons (aOR 23.18, 95% CI 8.18-65.72 and aOR 13.09, 95% CI 4.44-38.63, respectively; both p < .001).

Conclusion

Surgical management of ovarian endometriomas varied across gynecologic subspecialties. Compared with OB/GYN and gynecologic oncology surgeons, MIGS and REI surgeons were more likely to perform ovarian-sparing surgery and excise extra-ovarian endometriosis.

By this author

Related research

Megan Billow, Jensara Clay, Annemarie Newark, Meng Yao, Mariam AlHilli
M Billow, J Clay, A Newark, M Yao, M AlHilli
PMID 41571147 41571147 DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.036 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.036 Billow et al. 2026, Billow 2026