Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology
Surgery > Microsurgery > TubalInfertility > Female Factor > Tubal FactorSurgery > Laparoscopy > Technique
Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion
Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), e37-e43
Abstract
This document reviews surgical options for achieving patency in obstructed fallopian tubes and the factors that must be considered when deciding between surgical repair and IVF. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;97:539–45).
Topics
Cite this article
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2015). Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. *Fertility and sterility*, *103*(6), e37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):e37-43. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. "Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 103, no. 6, 2015, pp. e37-43.
Keywords
Decision Making, Fallopian Tube Diseases/complications/diagnosis/surgery, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female/diagnosis/etiology/therapy, Patient Selection, Practice Guidelines As Topic, Reproductive Medicine/standards, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Salpingectomy/methods/standards, Treatment Outcome, United States, Fallopian Tube, Hydrosalpinx, Infertility, Sterilization Reversal, Tubal Disease