Distal tubal occlusion — including hydrosalpinx, fimbrial agglutination, and peritubal adhesions — is a correctable cause of tubal-factor infertility amenable to salpingoneostomy, fimbrioplasty, and adhesiolysis under PEARS principles. Restoration of distal tubal patency and normal fimbrial architecture allows natural conception and avoids the bypassing of physiological fertilization that characterizes assisted reproductive technology.
are distal tubal anomalies linked to endometriosis, peritubal cyst and infertility surgery, fimbrioplasty for distal tubal occlusion, can a hydrosalpinx be surgically repaired, accessory fallopian tube and ectopic pregnancy risk, NaProTechnology fallopian tube surgery PEARS, does removing a peritubal cyst improve fertility, fimbria ovarica elongation ovum pickup
Hilgers et al. 2004, Hilgers 2004
Cite this article
Hilgers, T. W. (2004). Chapter 76: PEARS for the Fallopian Tubes: Distal Occlusions and Other Applications. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 1031-1044.
Hilgers TW. Chapter 76: PEARS for the Fallopian Tubes: Distal Occlusions and Other Applications. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY. 2004:1031-1044.
Hilgers, T. W. "Chapter 76: PEARS for the Fallopian Tubes: Distal Occlusions and Other Applications." The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 2004, pp. 1031-1044.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY
Pelvic adhesions from prior infection, surgery, or endometriosis restrict tubal motility, occlude the fimbriae, and distort ovarian-tubal relationships, constituting a primary mechanical barrier to natural conception. Microsurgical adhesiolysis performed under NaProTECHNOLOGY protocols achieves tubal patency and restores anatomical relationships, enabling natural pregnancy in a substantial proportion of cases that would otherwise be directed to IVF.
reproductive-surgery/tubal-surgery/tubal-cannulationinfertility/tubal-factor/distal-tubal-diseaserestorative-reproductive-medicine/restorative-care-and-assisted-reproduction/outcome-comparisons
Open Access
Obrzut B et al., 2022·Journal of clinical medicine
Tubal diseases account for 25-40% of female factor infertility. Mainly, they involve the distal part of the fallopian tube, and hydrosalpinx is the most severe manifestation. Usually, the management decision is made between reconstructive surgery and ART, depending on the severity of the tubal damage, patient age, ovarian reserve, and seminogram, as well as financial, religious, ethical, and psychological factors. Estimated live-birth rates after corrective surgery range from 9% to 69%. The success rate of IVF is about 30% live-birth rate per cycle initiated in women across all ages with tubal factor infertility. Surgery offers a long-term cure and patients may attempt conception many times but are burdened with perioperative adverse events. IVF bypasses potential complications of operative treatment; however, this has its own unique risks. The effectiveness of reconstructive surgery versus ART has not been adequately evaluated. The success of fertility management depends on a thorough interpretation of existing data and careful patient selection. The presented review provides updates on the most recent progress in this area.
More than 70 million couples suffer from infertility worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fertility outcomes after laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy in female infertility. Laparoscopic distal tuboplasty was carried out for 402 cases at the Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital in Yaoundé-Cameroon in Central Africa from December 2002 to December 2007. Laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy were done using bipolar electrocoagulation and conventional endoscopic instruments. Log-rank test was used to compare cumulative rate curves of intrauterine pregnancy with respect to the tubal stages. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean age of the patients was 31.6±5.45 years. Secondary infertility was the most frequent type of infertility (70.14%). The laparoscopic tubal surgery done consisted of fimbrioplasty in 185(46%) cases and neosalpingostomy in 217 (54%) cases. Of 260 women followed up after tuboplasty, there were overall 74 (28.48%) pregnancies; 68(26.1%) intrauterine pregnancies and 6(2.3%) ectopic pregnancies. Pregnancy rates were significantly associated to the tubal stage (63% in stage 1, 15% in stage 3 and 00% in stage 4; p<0.001) and the adnexal adhesion scores (73.91% in the absence of adnexal adhesions and 8.8% in the case of a severe adnexal adhesion score). Of the 68 intrauterine pregnancies, there were 60(88%) live births and 8(12%) spontaneous abortions. It is believed that laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and neosalpingostomy should be the preferred choice when faced with tubal distal occlusion in a context of female infertility. This implies that training in endoscopic surgery should be regarded as an important issue in developing countries.
reproductive-surgery/tubal-surgery/tubal-cannulationinfertility/tubal-factor/distal-tubal-diseaserestorative-reproductive-medicine/restorative-care-and-assisted-reproduction/outcome-comparisons
Open Access
Franjoine SE et al., 2015·Minimally invasive surgery
Objective. To study the reproductive outcomes of modified laparoscopic fimbrioplasty (MLF), a surgical technique designed to increase the working surface area of the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube. We postulated that an improvement in fimbrial function through MLF will improve reproductive outcomes. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. Academic tertiary-care medical center. Patients. Women with minimal endometriosis or unexplained infertility, who underwent MLF during diagnostic laparoscopy (n = 50) or diagnostic laparoscopy alone (n = 87). Intervention. MLF involved gentle, circumferential dilatation of the fimbria and lysis of fimbrial adhesions bridging the fimbrial folds. Main Outcome Measures. The primary outcome was pregnancy rate and the secondary outcome was time to pregnancy. Results. The pregnancy rate for the MLF group was 40.0%, compared to 28.7% for the control group. The average time to pregnancy for the MLF group was 13 weeks, compared to 18 weeks for the control group. The pregnancy rate in the MLF group was significantly higher for patients ≤35 ys (51.5% versus 28.8%), but not for those >35 ys (17.6% versus 28.6%). Conclusion. MLF was associated with a significant increase in pregnancy rate for patients ≤35 ys.