Fertility Awareness · Biomarkers

Self-Monitoring of Fertility Hormones: A New Era for Natural Family Planning?

Blackwell L, Cooke D, Brown S

Published July 5, 2018 The Linacre Quarterly, 85(1), 26-34
DOI 10.1177/0024363918756387 PMID 29970935 PMC PMC6027114
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Urine hormone tests may catch ovulation mucus and temperature miss

Home urine hormone tests may show ovary activity that mucus, temperature and LH signs sometimes miss, a 2018 review argues. The authors work on home fertility monitoring. Their evidence comes from their own earlier work and from pooled analyses of women with normal cycles.

Key Findings

  • Of 113 normal cycles in the authors' earlier study, 101 showed an LH peak they could identify.
  • A meta-analysis found the LH peak missed in about 13 percent of cycles; individual reports gave figures from 0 percent to 57 percent.
  • A meta-analysis suggests mucus symptoms go unreported in about 10 percent of cycles in women with apparently normal cycles; reports spanned 0 percent to 24 percent.
  • A BBT shift went undetected in about 2 percent of such women; reports spanned 0 percent to 69 percent.
  • The authors state it is not unusual for 10–20 percent of people with supposedly normal cycles to be disordered, usually with no ovulation or a deficient luteal phase.

Interpretation

The article is an expert review with no stated literature search, and it enrolled no new participants. The percentages come from meta-analyses and earlier work, and the ranges are wide. The authors note that most natural family planning studies leave out women with missing mucus symptoms, because only experienced users can join, so participants are self-selected. They write that natural family planning works well for many women and that they wish to promote it. Their view that home hormone measurements raise efficacy is a conviction, and the article tests no pregnancy outcomes. They call for more research on early mucus peaks.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine reads the cycle through the ovulatory event. The review reports that regular bleeding can occur without ovulation. It also reports that some ovulatory cycles have a deficient luteal phase. The authors say the Marquette method already uses a home hormone monitor in part.

Abstract

Natural family planning (NFP) methods have served many generations well, and in particular, the symptothermal or symptohormonal methods. The comparison of daily mucus and temperature records for individual cycles with daily hormone measurements, which is now possible, shows that some of the assumptions underlying NFP may not be completely accurate. The various methods are inadvertently depending on an element of chance, which, of course, cannot be known by the NFP user. However, it is statistically inevitable that such errors will result eventually in an unexpected pregnancy, and these discrepancies are the likely reason for the method failures. Further research and integration of home hormone measurements with NFP symptoms are needed.

Summary

Traditional NFP methods, based on the observations of temperature, mucus, and luteinizing hormone, can work well. However, these data are sometimes difficult to interpret, and significant changes in the variables are sometimes "missing" from some cycles. Changes in these variables are elicited by the estrogen and progesterone released from the ovaries. It follows that the direct measures of events in the ovaries are the levels of estrogen and progesterone or their derivatives in blood or urine. Measurements of urinary derivatives of estrogen and progesterone can be used to monitor the ovaries directly and are clearer indicators than traditional NFP methods.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Biomarkers › Urinary Hormone Monitoring · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Hormonal Markers · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone
Leonard F Blackwell, Len Blackwell, Simon Brown
L Blackwell, S Brown
PMID 29970935 29970935 DOI 10.1177/0024363918756387 10.1177/0024363918756387 Blackwell et al. 2018, Blackwell 2018

Cite this article

Blackwell, L., Cooke, D., & Brown, S. (2018). Self-Monitoring of Fertility Hormones: A New Era for Natural Family Planning? The Linacre Quarterly, 85(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363918756387