Women who have experienced reproductive loss (i.e., miscarriage, stillbirth, abortion) evaluated the usefulness of a novel screening tool, Reproductive Grief Screen (RGS), to identify patients struggling with ongoing, complicated grief.
Methods
This mixed-methods study involved U.S. women who had experienced reproductive loss. Online data collection resulted in 27 interviews and 282 surveys completed. Perceptions of and preferences about RGS were thematically analyzed. Chi square analyses assessed relationships between demographics and tool preferences.
Results
RGS validated women's experiences with grief after reproductive loss. Women noted their providers may be unaware of their loss(es). Participants requested periodic screening using RGS beginning shortly after a loss (or during new patient intake) and occurring regularly (e.g., annually). Overall, women preferred completing RGS online before an appointment, though preferences varied by demographics (i.e., age, time since loss). Participants want providers to compassionately discuss RGS results with them and offer appropriate resources.
Conclusion
The RGS can help identify largely ignored grief after reproductive loss. INNOVATION: Findings from group and individual interviews and a survey of women who have coped with reproductive loss suggest that use of a brief RGS tool could reshape clinical practice to aid women who might be facing complicated grief. Moreover, women expressed clear preferences for how to implement use of the RGS in clinical contexts.
reproductive grief screening tool, miscarriage grief assessment, stillbirth emotional support, pregnancy loss counseling, complicated grief reproductive loss, patient screening grief after miscarriage, abortion grief long term, reproductive loss clinical practice, perinatal loss patient care, grief validation reproductive loss, emotional support after pregnancy loss
Cite this article
Bute, J. J., Brann, M., Cara Buskmiller, & Fredenburg, M. (2023). "There's no time limit on grief:" Women's perspectives on a novel reproductive grief screening tool. *PEC innovation*, *3*, 100244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100244
Bute JJ, Brann M, Cara Buskmiller, Fredenburg M. "There's no time limit on grief:" Women's perspectives on a novel reproductive grief screening tool. PEC Innov. 2023;3:100244. doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100244
Bute, J. J., et al. ""There's no time limit on grief:" Women's perspectives on a novel reproductive grief screening tool." *PEC innovation*, vol. 3, 2023, pp. 100244.
Krolak M et al., 2023International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Objective: The aim of the present study was three-fold. One, to assess the prevalence of medical traumatization in outpatients of a gynecologic department; two, to analyze the relationship of medical ...
Pregnancy > Postpartum > DepressionPregnancy > Recurrent Loss > EtiologyGeneral OB/GYN > Clinical Practice > Quality
Schliep KC et al., 2022Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Background: Women with endometriosis may have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Research has focused on infertility clinic populations limiting generalisability. Few studies report diff...
Kohl Schwartz AS et al., 2017Fertility and Sterility
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of miscarriage in women with endometriosis (WwE) compared with disease-free control women (CW).
Design: Cross-sectional analysis nested in a retrospective obse...
Santulli P et al., 2016Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
STUDY Question: Were spontaneous miscarriages more frequent in women with histologically proven endometriosis when compared with endometriosis-free controls? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometriosis-affected wom...