Pregnancy Early Pregnancy

A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages

Coomarasamy A, Williams H, Truchanowicz E, Seed PT, Small R, Quenby S, Gupta P, Dawood F, Koot YE, Bender Atik R, Bloemenkamp KW, Brady R, Briley AL, Cavallaro R, Cheong YC, Chu JJ, Eapen A, Ewies A, Hoek A, Kaaijk EM, Koks CA, Li TC, MacLean M, Mol BW, Moore J, Ross JA, Sharpe L, Stewart J, Vaithilingam N, Farquharson RG, Kilby MD, Khalaf Y, Goddijn M, Regan L, Rai R

Published November 26, 2015 The New England Journal of Medicine, 373(22), 2141-2148
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1504927 PMID 26605928

RRM Academy Synopsis

Progesterone matched placebo for live births in unexplained recurrent loss

In a randomized trial of 836 women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, about 66 of 100 women on progesterone and 63 on placebo had live births. The difference was not significant. Treatment began after a positive pregnancy test and ran to 12 weeks of pregnancy.

Key Findings

  • Live birth after 24 weeks occurred in 65.8% (262 of 398 women) with progesterone and 63.3% (271 of 428 women) with placebo (relative rate, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.15).
  • The absolute difference in the live birth rate was 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, −4.0 to 9.0).
  • Miscarriage occurred in 128 of 398 women (32.2%) given progesterone and 143 of 428 (33.4%) given placebo (relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79–1.17).
  • Congenital anomalies affected 3.0% of babies on the progesterone side (8 of 266) and 4.0% on the placebo side (11 of 276); relative risk 0.75, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.85.
  • Of 1568 women assessed, 836 who conceived naturally within 1 year and remained willing were randomly assigned: 404 to progesterone, 432 to placebo. Main-outcome follow-up was 98.8% (826 of 836 women).

Interpretation

PROMISE was a double-blind trial that randomly assigned women to progesterone or placebo at 36 sites in the United Kingdom and 9 in the Netherlands. Women aged 18 to 39 with unexplained recurrent miscarriage took part, and women with a known cause were excluded. Subgroups by age, earlier miscarriages and polycystic ovaries showed no evidence of a difference in effect. The authors note that treatment began after pregnancy was confirmed, so use before a positive test remains unaddressed.

RRM Context

RRM seeks the cause of pregnancy loss in each couple. After ovulation, the corpus luteum makes progesterone, which prepares the uterine lining for implantation. RRM clinicians regard a loss labeled unexplained as undiagnosed.

Abstract

Background

Progesterone is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. However, whether progesterone supplementation in the first trimester of pregnancy would increase the rate of live births among women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages is uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to investigate whether treatment with progesterone would increase the rates of live births and newborn survival among women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. We randomly assigned women with recurrent miscarriages to receive twice-daily vaginal suppositories containing either 400 mg of micronized progesterone or matched placebo from a time soon after a positive urinary pregnancy test (and no later than 6 weeks of gestation) through 12 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was live birth after 24 weeks of gestation.

Results

A total of 1568 women were assessed for eligibility, and 836 of these women who conceived naturally within 1 year and remained willing to participate in the trial were randomly assigned to receive either progesterone (404 women) or placebo (432 women). The follow-up rate for the primary outcome was 98.8% (826 of 836 women). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of live births was 65.8% (262 of 398 women) in the progesterone group and 63.3% (271 of 428 women) in the placebo group (relative rate, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.15; rate difference, 2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.0 to 9.0). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse events.

Conclusions

Progesterone therapy in the first trimester of pregnancy did not result in a significantly higher rate of live births among women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages. (Funded by the United Kingdom National Institute of Health Research; PROMISE Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN92644181.).

Responses

Topics

By this author

Related research

Pregnancy › Early Pregnancy › Progesterone Support · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Progesterone and Progestins · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone
Arri Coomarasamy, Helen Williams, Ewa Truchanowicz, Paul T Seed, Rachel Small, Siobhan Quenby, Pratima Gupta, Feroza Dawood, Yvonne E M Koot, Ruth Bender Atik, Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, Rebecca Brady, Annette L Briley, Rebecca Cavallaro, Ying C Cheong, Justin J Chu, Abey Eapen, Ayman Ewies, Annemieke Hoek, Eugenie M Kaaijk, Carolien A M Koks, Tin-Chiu Li, Marjory MacLean, Ben W Mol, Judith Moore, Jackie A Ross, Lisa Sharpe, Jane Stewart, Nirmala Vaithilingam, Roy G Farquharson, Mark D Kilby, Yacoub Khalaf, Mariette Goddijn, Lesley Regan, Rajendra Rai
A Coomarasamy, H Williams, E Truchanowicz, P Seed, R Small, S Quenby, P Gupta, F Dawood, Y Koot, R Atik, K Bloemenkamp, Becky Brady, R Brady, A Briley, Becky Cavallaro, R Cavallaro, Y Cheong, J Chu, A Eapen, A Ewies, A Hoek, E Kaaijk, C Koks, T Li, M MacLean, Benjamin Mol, B Mol, J Moore, J Ross, L Sharpe, J Stewart, N Vaithilingam, R Farquharson, M Kilby, Y Khalaf, M Goddijn, L Regan, R Rai
PMID 26605928 26605928 DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1504927 10.1056/NEJMoa1504927 Coomarasamy et al. 2015, Coomarasamy 2015