Efficacy of natural family planning methods

The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception, 15(5), 380-382

DOI 10.5840/em2019441217

Abstract

This letter to the editor discusses a review article commenting on the efficacy of contraceptive methods. It takes issue with section focused on natural family planning methods (Billings ovulation method calendar methods symptothermal method etc) and finds fault with the authors not differentiating between the various natural methods. It states that if the authors consider it appropriate to differentiate between the various hormonal contraceptives then differentiation between the natural methods is mandatory.

Topics

natural family planning efficacy comparison, Billings method effectiveness rates, symptothermal method clinical outcomes, FABM differentiation between methods, calendar method rhythm method differences, natural family planning method classification, ovulation method vs symptothermal, fertility awareness method comparison, natural contraception method distinctions, NFP method effectiveness literature review, natural methods proper differentiation

Cite this article

Freundl, G. (n.d.). Efficacy of natural family planning methods. *The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception*.

Related articles