The scientific foundations and most notable features of modern natural family planning (NFP) methods are described. NFP techniques require observation of the signs and symptoms occurring during the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle. Abstinence during the fertile period is implied when NFP is used to avoid pregnancy. Modern NFP methods are associated with success rates similar to those of oral contraceptives, the IUD, and condoms. NFP methods are based on such phenomena as the limited survival time of the ovum and sperm, the occurrence of ovulation only once per cycle, the ability to diagnose ovulation using simple means, and the ability of human beings to delay sexual satisfaction. Among the advantages of NFP methods are low cost, brevity of the required training time, increased knowledge of the body and capacity for self control, shared responsibility by both partners, and moral and religious acceptability. The Billings and symptothermal methods have shown average use-effectiveness rates ranging from 71.5 to 89.5% and from 83.4 to 97.8%, respectively. All studies of symptothermal methods conducted since 1985 have shown Pearl indexes under 5. The symptothermal method is based on observation of the duration of previous cycles, cervical mucus, basal body temperature, and optionally on palpation of the cervix and other symptoms such as breast swelling, acne, intermenstrual bleeding, and mood changes. Use of the symptothermal method requires special graph paper for recording the temperature and other symptoms. The beginning of the fertile phase is recognized by subtracting 19 from the shortest cycle in the past year, or by the appearance of cervical changes or changes in the mucus.
natural family planning effectiveness symptothermal Billings method, symptothermal method Pearl index effectiveness rate, Billings ovulation method cervical mucus fertility awareness, natural family planning basal body temperature cervical mucus, NFP methods success rates comparison oral contraceptives, fertile infertile phase menstrual cycle identification methods, symptothermal method scientific foundation use effectiveness, cervical mucus observation ovulation detection fertility planning, natural family planning advantages shared responsibility partners, fertility awareness based methods modern NFP techniques review
Soler et al. 1995, Soler 1995
Cite this article
Soler, F., Fernández Martínez, M., & Díaz Sáez, J. (1995). Natural family planning. An alternative. Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain), 18(208), 69-74.
Soler F, Fernández Martínez M, Díaz Sáez J. Natural family planning. An alternative. Rev Enferm. 1995;18(208):69-74.
Soler, Françoise, et al. "Natural family planning. An alternative." Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain), vol. 18, no. 208, 1995, pp. 69-74.
Natural family planning methods provide a unique option for committed couples. Advantages include the lack of medical adverse effects and the opportunity for participants to learn about reproduction. Modern methods of natural family planning involve observation of biologic markers to identify fertile days in a woman's reproductive cycle. The timing of intercourse can be planned to achieve or avoid pregnancy based on the identified fertile period. The current evidence for effectiveness of natural family planning methods is limited to lower-quality clinical trials without control groups. Nevertheless, perfect use of these methods is reported to be at least 95 percent effective in preventing pregnancy. The effectiveness of typical use is 76 percent, which demonstrates that motivation and commitment to the method are essential for success. Depending on the method, couples can learn about natural family planning methods in a single office visit, through online instruction, or from certified instructors.
The objective of the present paper is to review the main results of recent European cycle databases on ovulation detection and determination of the fertile window performed by the women themselves. The ongoing German Long-term Cycle Database currently comprises 32788 prospectively collected cycle charts of 1551 women, the I European Cycle Database (10 countries) 1328 women/19048 cycles, the II European Cycle Database (six countries) 782 women/6724 cycles, and the World Health Organization Database (one European country) 234 women/2808 cycles. The women record cycle parameters (cervical mucus changes, temperature rise, etc.), family planning intention and sexual behavior. With the symptothermal method of natural family planning it has become possible to determine the fertile window in order to avoid pregnancy with a method effectiveness of 0.3%. According to a small sub-study, the ovulation time observed by the women themselves correlates closely with ovulation detected by ultrasound and measurement of luteinizing hormone (correlation within 1 day in 89% of the 62 cycles). Fertility awareness methods can be integrated into the management of sub-fertility. They seem to shorten the time to pregnancy. Self-observation of the fertile window puts women into a position to develop a high level of reproductive competence that could be used much more in different areas than is currently the case.
Natural Family Planning (NFP) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "methods for planning or avoiding pregnancies by observation of the natural signs and symptoms of the fertile and infertile phase of the menstrual cycle. It is implicit in the definition of natural family planning, when used to avoid conception that drugs, devices and surgical procedures are not used, there is abstinence from sexual intercourse during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle, and the act of intercourse, when it occurs, is complete."(1) The fertile period may be determined by using Rhythm, a calculation based on previous cycles, basal body temperature (BBT) charting alone, mucus secretion alone (Billings or Ovulation method), or symptothermal charting (Serena method), which includes observation of both mucus and BBT. The effectiveness of each method is discussed, and the social and psychological profile of couples who use NFP is reviewed. Nfp methods can be used not only to avoid pregnancy, but also to achieve pregnancy and thus are particularly useful in investigating and treating infertility. The function of the Family Life Clinic at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto is described.
Ninety-five menstrual cycles were studied in 20 women undergoing donor artificial insemination (AID). In 49 cycles basal body temperature (BBT) changes were charted daily and both daily cervical mucus scoring (modified Insler score) and daily realtime ultrasonography (USS) were performed from day 11 to ovulation. AID was performed only on the day of follicular rupture. A control group, not subjected to USS, were inseminated two to three times per cycle over 46 cycles in the periovulatory period. The Insler score was found to be a reliable indicator of follicular development and rupture. The BBT was found to be less reliable than the Insler score or USS. While USS may be used to confirm follicular development, the Insler score is reliable and less costly.