Laurinec, J. (2014). Ethical Problems in the Use of Hormonal Contraception. The national Catholic bioethics quarterly, 14(3), 491-524. https://doi.org/10.5840/ncbq201414310
Laurinec J. Ethical Problems in the Use of Hormonal Contraception. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2014;14(3):491-524. doi:10.5840/ncbq201414310
Laurinec, Jozef. "Ethical Problems in the Use of Hormonal Contraception." The national Catholic bioethics quarterly, vol. 14, no. 3, 2014, pp. 491-524.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Abstract
The development of hormonal contraception introduced a new era in medical practice, marked by the suppression of female fertility by interventions in the hormonal system. The interventions are very grave, as sex hormones are of existential importance both to preserve human life and to preserve the human species. This article conducts an ethical evaluation of the use of hormonal contraception through two ethical theories: natural law theory and virtue ethics. Based on philosophical reflection, the author examines what effects hormonal contraception has on primary goods and whether its use is congruent with the cardinal virtues. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14.3 (Autumn 2014): 491–524.
Segarra I et al., 2023·Front Med (Lausanne)·Free full text on PubMed Central
Hormone-based contraception disrupts hormonal balance, creating artificial states of anovulation and threatening women's health. We reviewed its main adverse effects and mechanisms on accelerated ovarian aging, mental health (emotional disruptions, depression, and suicide), sexuality (reduced libido), cardiovascular (brain stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and thrombosis), and oncological (breast, cervical, and endometrial cancers). Other "collateral damage" includes negative effects on communication, scientific mistrust, poor physician-patient relationships, increased patient burden, economic drain on the healthcare system, and environmental pollution. Hormone-sensitive tumors present a dilemma owing to their potential dual effects: preventing some cancers vs. higher risk for others remains controversial, with denial or dismissal as non-relevant adverse effects, information avoidance, and modification of scientific criteria. This lack of clinical assessment poses challenges to women's health and their right to autonomy. Overcoming these challenges requires an anthropological integration of sexuality, as the focus on genital bodily union alone fails to encompass the intimate relational expression of individuals, complete sexual satisfaction, and the intertwined feelings of trust, safety, tenderness, and endorsement of women's femininity.
Turner JV et al., 2018·Linacre Q·Free full text on PubMed Central
A reductive reading of Humanae vitae seeks to limit its appeal to a ban on contraception. In truth, however, it offers a vision of human sexuality and conjugal love with broad and enduring relevance. In setting forth the intrinsic complementarity and irreducibility of the unitive and procreative dimensions of the conjugal act, Paul VI has given us a hermeneutical key for assessing many contemporary ethical dilemmas in human reproductive medicine. From this perspective, this article seeks to apply the logic of Humanae vitae to several real-life scenarios confronted by medical practitioners, educators, and ethicists working in the field of fertility and reproductive health. These include a consideration of the ethics of prescribing hormonal contraceptives, the possibilities of investigating male infertility, issues of cooperation in counseling and assisting conception in same-sex relationships, the ethics pertaining to assisted reproductive technology (ART), the contested case of prenatal adoption, and the application of double-effect reasoning.
On the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the promulgation of Pope Paul VI's encyclical Humanae vitae, this article seeks to defend its enduring relevance to modern-day society, through application of its reasoning to contemporary dilemmas in reproductive medicine. It considers real cases of the ethics of prescribing hormonal contraceptives, of investigating male infertility, of cooperating in counseling and assisting conception in same-sex relationships, of ART, of prenatal adoption, and the application of double-effect reasoning.
Turczynski C et al., 2022·Linacre Q·Free full text on PubMed Central
This article is a case study illuminating the experience of a cradle Catholic who pursued a career in the field of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) as a laboratory director and embryologist. Twenty years after leaving the field, the observations leading to the crisis of conscience are further amplified by the reports of social, legal, ethical, and medical consequences of the technology. These consequences are explored in detail and can serve as a mini-review of the published scientific literature describing the obstetrical complications, peri-natal outcomes, and the long-term health effects on the offspring. This paper provides the documented evidence that can be used by the religious and medical community for shepherding the flock. The disordered approach to patient care is evidenced by five serious consequences resulting from the use of the technology. These include multiple pregnancy and selective reduction, abandoned and discarded embryos, adverse health effects to the women and children, legal and ethical problems, and human experimentation. An explanation for the adverse consequences can be found by exploring and applying the principles of Natural Law. Natural Law, as embraced by the Catholic Church, can be used as a starting point for conversion of heart for many who struggle with the immorality of ART. Deterring use of the technology coupled with increased motivation by scientist and health professionals to pursue restorative approaches within a moral framework offer our best solution to the treatment of infertility. Natural Law and the consequences of violating it provide evidence that science and medicine should not be practiced in a vacuum void of ethical and moral boundaries grounded in divine Wisdom.
Here I respond to Akers, Dhar, and Shah's (2016), Stubbs's (2016), Olshansky's (2016), and Kissling's (2016) commentaries on the article (Prior, 2016) in which I expressed concerns about the potential adverse long-term reproductive and bone health effects on normal adolescents’ maturation related to use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) for contraception and/or treatment. Although Akers et al. (2016) take exception, the precautionary principle on which medical/pharmaceutical ethics is based challenges us to show that CHC is officially indicated and effective in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with adolescents. Those who support current practices are obligated to provide young patients and their parents with evidence from large, population-based, prospective studies (or meta-analyses of longitudinal data) that adolescents who have used CHC develop the same menstrual cycle/ovulatory function, fertility, and reproductive lifespan and similar bone density and strength as peers who did not use CHC. Without this information there can be neither reproductive justice (Kissing, 2016), nor true choice. Why is this minimal, expected scientific data not available? It is likely that authors of practice guidelines for adolescent CHC contraceptive use and who advocate its “non-contraceptive benefits” have pro-estrogen cultural biases or conflicts of interests due to pharmaceutical industry connections. I agree with Olshansky (2016) that we should listen to adolescents’ concerns and use evidence-based and safe treatments for milder heavy bleeding and cramps. For heterosexual adolescents seeking contraception, we can suggest and explain the use of safer, yet effective, nonhormonal strategies, such as the copper IUD or a barrier plus full-dose vaginal spermicide.
Ethics and Policy › Reproductive Ethics › Conscience Protections
Jozef Laurinec
J Laurinec
DOI 10.5840/ncbq201414310 10.5840/ncbq201414310 Laurinec et al. 2014, Laurinec 2014
Cite this article
Laurinec, J. (2014). Ethical Problems in the Use of Hormonal Contraception. The national Catholic bioethics quarterly, 14(3), 491-524. https://doi.org/10.5840/ncbq201414310
Laurinec J. Ethical Problems in the Use of Hormonal Contraception. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2014;14(3):491-524. doi:10.5840/ncbq201414310
Laurinec, Jozef. "Ethical Problems in the Use of Hormonal Contraception." The national Catholic bioethics quarterly, vol. 14, no. 3, 2014, pp. 491-524.