Women of reproductive age need reliable and effective family planning methods to manage their fertility. Natural family planning (NFP) methods or fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) have been increasingly used by women due to their health benefits. Nevertheless, effectiveness of these natural methods remains inconsistent, and these methods are difficult for healthcare providers to implement in their clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Marquette Model NFP system to avoid pregnancy for women at multiple teaching sites using twelve months of retrospectively collected teaching data. Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) was used to determine typical unintended pregnancy rates for a total of 1,221 women. There were forty-two unintended pregnancies which provided a typical use unintended pregnancy rate of 6.7 per 100 women over twelve months of use. Eleven of the forty-two unintended pregnancies were associated with correct use of the method. The total unintended pregnancy rate over twelve months of use was 2.8 per 100 for women with regular cycles, 8.0 per 100 women for the postpartum and breastfeeding women, and 4.3 per 100 for women with irregular menstrual cycles. The Marquette Model system of NFP was effective when provided by health professionals who completed the Marquette Model NFP teacher training program.
Summary
This study involved determining whether healthcare professionals at ten sites across the United States and Canada trained to provide the Marquette Method NFP services can replicate the effectiveness demonstrated in previous studies of the method. We found a high level of effectiveness (i.e., very low pregnancy rates) in using the Marquette Method among women from various regions across North America with diverse reproductive backgrounds and in particular when using hormonal fertility marker. Healthcare providers who have been trained to teach NFP can successfully incorporate NFP services in their practice and assist their clients in choosing appropriate family planning methods.
Marquette Method effectiveness, natural family planning efficacy, fertility awareness-based methods FABM, Clearblue fertility monitor NFP, NFP multisite study, unintended pregnancy rate FABM, typical use effectiveness NFP, perfect use natural family planning, cervical mucus monitoring Marquette, hormonal fertility monitor method
PMID 35321484 35321484 DOI 10.1177/0024363920957515 10.1177/0024363920957515
Cite this article
Mu, Q., Fehring, R. J., & Bouchard, T. (2022). Multisite Effectiveness Study of the Marquette Method of Natural Family Planning Program. *The Linacre Quarterly*, *89*(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363920957515
Mu Q, Fehring RJ, Bouchard T. Multisite Effectiveness Study of the Marquette Method of Natural Family Planning Program. Linacre Q. 2022;89(1):64-72. doi:10.1177/0024363920957515
Mu, Q., et al. "Multisite Effectiveness Study of the Marquette Method of Natural Family Planning Program." *The Linacre Quarterly*, vol. 89, no. 1, 2022, pp. 64-72.
Mulcaire-Jones G et al., 2016The Linacre Quarterly
Various fertility indicators are used by natural family planning methods to identify the fertile and infertile phases of a woman's menstrual cycle: mucus observations, cycle-day probabilities, basal b...
This study reports on 632 cycles from 105 women who were using the CREIGHTON MODEL FertilityCare™ System to avoid pregnancy and had either a serious reason to avoid pregnancy or some degree of a lack ...
good of all, and above all, for the protection of the weak."2I submit that, no matter how appealing a marketplace model may seem for the NHS, it is a business model.As such the destruction of either p...
The uses of cervical mucus and basal body temperature as indicators of return to fertility postpartum have resulted in high unintended pregnancy rates. In 2013, a study found that when women used urin...