BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 307(6915), 1357, 1993
Natural family planning. Natural methods have cross cultural appeal
Author affiliations
- St Vincent's HospitalMelbourne
Abstract
good of all, and above all, for the protection of the weak."2I submit that, no matter how appealing a marketplace model may seem for the NHS, it is a business model.As such the destruction of either purchaser or provider is eventually certain, with the barbarisation of the survivor.It is not too late for consortiums of purchasers and consortiums of providers to join forces and become one NHS again.
Topics
natural family planning cross-cultural, natural methods family planning, NFP global acceptance, fertility awareness cultural appeal, natural birth regulation methods, natural contraception worldwide, family planning without drugs, symptothermal method cross-cultural, Billings ovulation method global, natural fertility regulation
PMID 8257902 8257902 DOI 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1357-b 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1357-b Billings et al. 1993, Billings 1993
Cite this article
Billings, J. J. (1993). Natural family planning. Natural methods have cross cultural appeal. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 307(6915), 1357. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1357-b
Billings JJ. Natural family planning. Natural methods have cross cultural appeal. BMJ. 1993;307(6915):1357. doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1357-b
Billings, J. J. "Natural family planning. Natural methods have cross cultural appeal." BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 307, no. 6915, 1993, pp. 1357.
Related articles
research-methods/framing-and-discourse-analysis/institutional-default-analysis assisted-reproduction/industry-and-access/utilization-trendsethics-and-policy/policy-and-regulation/access-and-coverage-policy
Is ART utilization the best indicator of access to fertility care?
Stanford JB et al., 2020 · Reprod Biomed Online
While we agree with many of the points stated by Dyer et al. in their recent commentary inRBMO(Dyer et al., 2020), we believe their conclusions are focused too narrowly. Limiting the indicator of access to, and utilization of, fertility treatment to assisted reproductive technology (ART) excludes information that is of key importance for subfertile couples, populations, and policymakers. Even in countries where access to ART is widespread, there are more births in subfertile couples through non-ART treatment than through ART (Stanford et al., 2016). While ART is necessary for some couples to have a child, it is not required for many subfertile couples, and overuse of ART may potentially be harmful (Annual Capri Workshop Group 2019). Focusing solely on ART as a metric may unnecessarily encourage overutilization (Boltz et al., 2017). We believe the focus on ART and its outcomes for national and international registries of fertility treatment has stunted the scientific development of non-ART treatments, including those which seek to address underlying health conditions (Boyle et al., 2018). There is a pressing and critical need to develop robust registries of couples treated with non-ART treatments, for the improvement of outcomes and the promotion of robust consumer choice. (Spandorfer, 2020). The ultimate measure of access to fertility care should be determined by the proportion of those with a desire for fertility who achieve a healthy live birth, whether or not ART is required to do so (Mascarenhas et al., 2012). Therefore, notwithstanding methodologic challenges, registry assessments should be developed and supported for all fertility treatments, not only ART.
gynecology/breast-health/breast-cancer-risk postpartum/infant-feeding/breastfeeding-supportethics-and-policy/policy-and-regulation/access-and-coverage-policy
Breastfeeding and Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: Implications for Black Mothers
Anstey EH et al., 2017 · Am J Prev Med
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of death from cancer among U.S. women. Studies have suggested that breastfeeding reduces breast cancer risk among parous women, and there is mounting evidence that this association may differ by subtype such that breastfeeding may be more protective of some invasive breast cancer types. The purpose of this review is to discuss breast cancer disparities in the context of breastfeeding and the implications for black mothers. Black women in the U.S. have lower rates of breastfeeding and nearly twice the rates of triple-negative breast cancer (an aggressive subtype) compared with white women. In addition to individual challenges to breastfeeding, black women may also differentially face contextual barriers such as a lack of social and cultural acceptance in their communities, inadequate support from the healthcare community, and unsupportive work environments. More work is needed to improve the social factors and policies that influence breastfeeding rates at a population level. Such efforts should give special consideration to the needs of black mothers to adequately address disparities in breastfeeding among this group and possibly help reduce breast cancer risk. Interventions such as peer counseling, hospital policy changes, breastfeeding-specific clinic appointments, group prenatal education, and enhanced breastfeeding programs have been shown to be effective in communities of color. A comprehensive approach that integrates interventions across multiple levels and settings may be most successful in helping mothers reach their breastfeeding goals and reducing disparities in breastfeeding and potentially breast cancer incidence.
health-economics/access-and-coverage/insurance-coverage assisted-reproduction/industry-and-access/treatment-costsethics-and-policy/policy-and-regulation/access-and-coverage-policy
The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis
Chambers GM et al., 2014 · Fertil Steril
Comment in Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):47-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.043. To systematically quantify the impact of consumer cost on assisted reproduction technology (ART) utilization and numbers of embryos transferred. Ordinary least squared (OLS) regression models were constructed to measure the independent impact of ART affordability-measured as consumer cost relative to average disposable income-on ART utilization and embryo transfer practices. Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing ART treatment. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): OLS regression coefficient for ART affordability, which estimates the independent effect of consumer cost relative to income on utilization and number of embryos transferred. RESULT(S): ART affordability was independently and positively associated with ART utilization with a mean OLS coefficient of 0.032. This indicates that, on average, a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 1 percentage point of disposable income predicts a 3.2% increase in utilization. ART affordability was independently and negatively associated with the number of embryos transferred, indicating that a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 10 percentage points of disposable income predicts a 5.1% increase in single-embryo transfer cycles. CONCLUSION(S): The relative cost that consumers pay for ART treatment predicts the level of access and number of embryos transferred. Policies that affect ART funding should be informed by these findings to ensure equitable access to treatment and clinically responsible embryo transfer practices.
ethics-and-policy/policy-and-regulation/access-and-coverage-policy contraception/comparative-studies/contraception-versus-fertility-awareness
Natural Family Planning Instruction as a Marriage Requirement a Retrospective Analysis of the First Two Years' Experience in the Diocese of Covington()
Manhart MD, 2012 · Linacre Q
Beginning January 1, 2009, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Covington mandated that all engaged couples take a full course of NFP instruction as part of preparation for marriage within the Church. Using data from the Couple to Couple League and its Covington-based instructors, overall NFP instruction and characteristics of the couples attending classes before and after the mandate were examined. In the first two years, 66 percent and 77 percent of couples who married in the diocese, respectively, attended an NFP class. The mandate shifted the reasons for couples taking NFP instruction; prior to the mandate, 40 percent of engaged couples attended classes solely due to a pastor's requirement while 74 percent of engaged couples did so afterward (p < 0.001). Hormonal contraceptive use was common; 54 percent reported current use while another 23 percent reported former use. Current hormonal contraceptive use was significantly more common among those attending solely due to the mandate compared to those attending for multiple reasons (59 percent vs. 41 percent respectively, p = 0.004) and was significantly more common among engaged compared to married couples (53 percent vs. 8 percent respectively, p < 0.001). Cohabiting engaged couples were significantly more likely to have ever used hormonal contraceptives (91 percent vs. 71 percent, p < 0.0001), compared to engaged couples who were not cohabiting at the time of NFP instruction, and were significantly less likely to both be Catholic (55 percent vs. 70 percent, p = 0.002). Overall, implementation of mandatory NFP instruction as part of marriage preparation was successful; in post-class surveys, over 90 percent of couples acknowledged they had a better understanding of their fertility, and 83 percent would recommend the classes to a friend. Longer-term prospective follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts to couples exposed to such a requirement.