The conservative surgical treatment of endometriosis: evaluation of pregnancy success with respect to the extent of disease as categorized using contemporary classification systems
D S Guzick, J A Rock, Howard W. Jones, K C Sapp, M Schweditsch, C Sengos
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterROR
A homogeneous group of 214 infertile women with endometriosis treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1960 to 1979 received conservative surgery as the sole therapeutic modality. Among this group, 115 patients (54%) conceived following surgery; of these conceptions, 109 resulted in a living child. Among 49 patients with secondary infertility, the spontaneous abortion rate was reduced from 49% to 20% after conservative surgery (P less than or equal to 0.01). Three contemporary classification systems were utilized to categorize patients according to the sites and amount of endometriosis at the time of conservative surgery. Those systems suggested by Buttram (Fertil Steril 30:240, 1978) and by Kistner and coauthors (Fertil Steril 28:108, 1977) revealed differences among fecundability rates among the different categories (P less than or equal to 0.01); however, the system suggested by The American Fertility Society (AFS) (Fertil Steril 32:633, 1979) revealed significant differences only if categories were combined (mild plus moderate versus severe plus extensive, P less than or equal to 0.05). Nevertheless, the AFS system revealed that pregnancy success was significantly reduced if an ovarian endometrioma was greater than 3 cm or had ruptured (P less than or equal to 0.01).
conservative surgery endometriosis pregnancy outcome classification, endometriosis surgical treatment fertility success rate, Rock Guzick Johns Hopkins endometriosis surgery pregnancy, endometriosis classification system AFS Buttram Kistner pregnancy rate, ovarian endometrioma size rupture pregnancy prognosis, conservative surgery endometriosis spontaneous abortion rate reduction, endometriosis staging fecundability surgical treatment, infertility endometriosis surgery sole treatment modality, secondary infertility endometriosis miscarriage rate surgery, endometriosis severity classification pregnancy success conservative surgery
PMID 7202738 7202738 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45311-2 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45311-2
Cite this article
Rock, J. A., Guzick, D. S., Sengos, C., Schweditsch, M., Sapp, K. C., & Jones HW Jr (1981). The conservative surgical treatment of endometriosis: evaluation of pregnancy success with respect to the extent of disease as categorized using contemporary classification systems. *Fertility and sterility*, *35*(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45311-2
Rock JA, Guzick DS, Sengos C, Schweditsch M, Sapp KC, Jones HW Jr. The conservative surgical treatment of endometriosis: evaluation of pregnancy success with respect to the extent of disease as categorized using contemporary classification systems. Fertil Steril. 1981;35(2):131-137. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45311-2
Rock, J. A., et al. "The conservative surgical treatment of endometriosis: evaluation of pregnancy success with respect to the extent of disease as categorized using contemporary classification systems." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 35, no. 2, 1981, pp. 131-137.
Objective: To examine birth outcomes between children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and sibling births from unassisted conceptions.
Design: Retrospect...
Infertility > Assisted Reproductive Technology > IVF OutcomesPregnancy > Neonatal Outcomes > Birth Weight and Gestational AgeContraception/Comparison > ART vs Natural Conception > Sibling Studies
Objective: Disordered eating behaviors may impact the gynecologic health of adolescents through effects on menstrual cycle function and body size; however, few studies have evaluated these association...