Empty Follicle Syndrome (EFS)
Empty Follicle Syndrome (EFS) is an ultrasound finding in which no cumulus oophorus is visible in an intact follicle before rupture. The cumulus is the cluster of cells around the egg (oocyte). In EFS, the cumulus is not visible in either the lengthwise (longitudinal) or the crosswise (transverse) view.1
During a follicle maturation study, the sonographer looks for the cumulus early. The search begins as soon as a lead follicle appears, while it is still intact. The cumulus appears as echoes on the inner wall of the follicle. It must be seen in both views to confirm its presence. If it is not seen in either view, the follicle is scored as empty.
The term began in assisted reproduction. Coulam and colleagues first described it in 1986. In those IVF cycles, drugs had stimulated the ovaries. The team drew fluid from the follicles (follicular aspiration) and retrieved no eggs.2
In mainstream assisted reproduction literature, the term still means that one finding: no egg retrieved after ovarian stimulation. Dr. Thomas W. Hilgers gave the same name to a related but distinct finding. In his usage, it means no visible cumulus on transvaginal ultrasound in a natural cycle without drugs.3 He built this finding into the way NaProTechnology classifies ovulation disorders by ultrasound.1
The two findings answer different questions. In IVF, clinicians puncture the follicle and check whether they retrieve an egg. The cumulus check shows whether an egg and its cumulus are present before rupture. It does not show that the egg is released.
This finding is not a diagnosis in itself. It appears across the other ovulation disorders seen on ultrasound. Hilgers observed an absent cumulus in mature follicles that go on to rupture fully. He also observed it in luteinized unruptured follicles, Immature Follicle Syndrome, Partial Rupture Syndrome, delayed rupture, and afollicularism.
One cycle can show any of these rupture patterns and also lack a visible cumulus. The system records both findings side by side on the same scan. It does not sort them into competing groups. The finding also requires a follicle to examine. That requirement sets it apart from anovulation. In anovulation, no follicle grows far enough for a cumulus check at all.
Detection requires repeated scans through the cycle (a serial follicle maturation study). Charting alone cannot detect it. In Hilgers' sonographic classification of ovulation disorders, the empty follicle is a cumulus reading made in every cycle. Hilgers defined it as its own sonographic finding. It occurs independently of the type of rupture. The classification therefore records it alongside the rupture pattern on the same scan.
Pregnancy remains possible when the cumulus is not visible. Ultrasound has a meaningful false-negative rate, so it can miss a cumulus that is present. Pregnancies have occurred in cycles with no visible cumulus, though less often than in cycles where the cumulus was seen.
The system records the empty follicle next to the rupture pattern on the same scan. This single finding does not change treatment on its own. Serial follicle scans differ from a standard workup. Their value lies in the full picture across a cycle, not in any single reading.
Cited in this entry
- Hilgers TW. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY. Pope Paul VI Institute Press; 2004. https://rrmacademy.org/library/the-medical-surgical-practice-of-naprotechnology-rectiyuppdjrktphh/
- Coulam CB, Bustillo M, Schulman JD. Empty follicle syndrome. Fertility and Sterility. 1986. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3781029/
- Hilgers TW, Dvorak AD, Tamisiea DF, Ellis RL, Yaksich PJ. Sonographic definition of the empty follicle syndrome. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 1989. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2668550/
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult an RRM clinician or healthcare provider for guidance specific to your situation.

