Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology : the Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 62(3), 336-344

DOI 10.1002/uog.26171 PMID 36730180

Abstract

The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review was to provide a strategic analysis, in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis), of the current evidence regarding the management of uterine isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect). Strengths include the fact that isthmocele can be diagnosed on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, and that surgical repair may restore natural fertility potential and prevent secondary infertility, as well as reduce the risk of miscarriage and other obstetric complications. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the best diagnostic method and criteria, as well as the potential benefits of surgical repair with respect to fertility. There is a need for experienced surgeons skilled in the various isthmocele repair techniques. Isthmocele repair does not prevent the need for Cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies. There is increasing awareness regarding the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing isthmocele. This may lead to surgical correction and prevention of obstetric and perinatal complications in subsequent pregnancies, including Cesarean scar pregnancy. Regarding threats, the existence of different surgical techniques means that there is a risk of selecting an inadequate approach if the type of isthmocele and the patient's characteristics are not considered. There is a risk of overtreatment when asymptomatic defects are repaired surgically. Finally, there is an absence of cost-effectiveness analyses to justify routine repair. Thus, while there are many data suggesting that isthmocele has an adverse effect on both natural fertility and the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques, high-quality evidence to support surgical isthmocele repair in all asymptomatic patients desiring future fertility are lacking. There is increasing agreement to recommend hysteroscopic repair of isthmocele as a first-line approach as long as the residual myometrial thickness is at least 2.5-3.0 mm.

Topics

isthmocele cesarean scar defect diagnosis management, hysteroscopic repair isthmocele residual myometrial thickness, cesarean scar defect transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis, isthmocele surgical repair fertility restoration, cesarean scar pregnancy prevention surgical correction, SWOT analysis isthmocele management evidence review, secondary infertility cesarean scar defect treatment, isthmocele repair techniques laparoscopic hysteroscopic comparison, cesarean scar defect miscarriage obstetric complications, Dominguez Pacheco isthmocele state of the art review
PMID 36730180 36730180 DOI 10.1002/uog.26171 10.1002/uog.26171

Cite this article

Dominguez JA, Alonso Pacheco, L., Moratalla, E., Carugno JA, Carvajal Carrera, M. J., Pérez‐Milán, F., Caballero Borrego, M., & Alcazar, J. L. (2023). Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis. *Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology*, *62*(3), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26171

Related articles