The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review was to provide a strategic analysis, in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis), of the current evidence regarding the management of uterine isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect). Strengths include the fact that isthmocele can be diagnosed on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, and that surgical repair may restore natural fertility potential and prevent secondary infertility, as well as reduce the risk of miscarriage and other obstetric complications. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the best diagnostic method and criteria, as well as the potential benefits of surgical repair with respect to fertility. There is a need for experienced surgeons skilled in the various isthmocele repair techniques. Isthmocele repair does not prevent the need for Cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies. There is increasing awareness regarding the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing isthmocele. This may lead to surgical correction and prevention of obstetric and perinatal complications in subsequent pregnancies, including Cesarean scar pregnancy. Regarding threats, the existence of different surgical techniques means that there is a risk of selecting an inadequate approach if the type of isthmocele and the patient's characteristics are not considered. There is a risk of overtreatment when asymptomatic defects are repaired surgically. Finally, there is an absence of cost-effectiveness analyses to justify routine repair. Thus, while there are many data suggesting that isthmocele has an adverse effect on both natural fertility and the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques, high-quality evidence to support surgical isthmocele repair in all asymptomatic patients desiring future fertility are lacking. There is increasing agreement to recommend hysteroscopic repair of isthmocele as a first-line approach as long as the residual myometrial thickness is at least 2.5-3.0 mm.
PMID 36730180 36730180 DOI 10.1002/uog.26171 10.1002/uog.26171
Cite this article
Dominguez JA, Alonso Pacheco, L., Moratalla, E., Carugno JA, Carvajal Carrera, M. J., Pérez‐Milán, F., Caballero Borrego, M., & Alcazar, J. L. (2023). Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis. *Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology*, *62*(3), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26171
Dominguez JA, Alonso Pacheco L, Moratalla E, Carugno JA, Carvajal Carrera MJ, Pérez‐Milán F, et al. Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(3):336-344. doi:10.1002/uog.26171
Dominguez JA, et al. "Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis." *Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology*, vol. 62, no. 3, 2023, pp. 336-344.
Stavridis K et al., 2024Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
The prevalence of uterine isthmocele, also known as a uterine niche, has risen in parallel with increasing cesarean section (CS) rates, affecting approximately 60% of women depending on their history ...
Harjee R et al., 2021Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of surgical management for isthmoceles in patients presenting with secondary infertility.
Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and C...
Setubal A et al., 2017Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
An isthmocele appears as a fluid pouchlike defect in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a prior cesarean section and ranges in prevalence from 19% to 84%, a direct relation to the increase in ce...
Munoz JL et al., 2023Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology : the Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Data sharing not applicable - no new data generated