Uterine and Pelvic Conditions · Adenomyosis
Tan J, Yong P, Bedaiwy MA
Cite this paper
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Author affiliations
1 institution
03rmrcq20 Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
The purpose of this review is to summarize and highlight recent critical advances in the diagnosis, classification, and management of adenomyosis.
Recent studies have clarified the specific mechanism through which adenomyotic lesions invade the underlying myometrium by epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Correlation studies using diagnostic MRI also strongly support the hypothesis of a different pathogenesis between the inner and outer myometrium forms of adenomyosis. Given advances in diagnostic imaging, several international organizations have also highlighted the importance of classification systems for adenomyosis. Finally, selective progesterone receptor modulators and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have demonstrated significant promise for treating pelvic pain and bleeding associated with adenomyosis, whereas novel fertility-preserving surgical techniques have been introduced to excise diffuse adenomyotic pathology while maintaining adequate uterine integrity.
Recent attempts at a uniform and reproducible classification system likely represent the first step for the development of a staging system for adenomyosis that can be correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms and promote an individualized therapeutic approach. Simultaneously, further insights into the etiology and pathogenesis as outlined in this review may also help in the development of targeted medical therapies.
Rojas HE et al., 2026 · Journal of women's health (2002)
To characterize differences between individuals with and without mid-cycle pain in a registry cohort with endometriosis. Prospective analysis of data from the Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort Data Registry (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02911090) at a tertiary referral center in Western Canada. Three hundred forty-five individuals aged 18-49 years who: (1) had at least one episode of menstrual bleeding in the last 3 months, (2) attended a baseline initial visit, and (3) subsequently had surgery with histological confirmation of endometriosis between January 2018 and December 2023. Exclusion criteria included (1) previous hysterectomy; (2) hormonal suppressive therapy use in the last 3 months; and (3) missing data on mid-cycle pain, history of hormonal therapy use, or menstrual cycle regularity. N/A. Mid-cycle pain in the last month versus No mid-cycle pain in the last month. Of the 345 participants, 67% (n = 232) reported mid-cycle pain in the last month. Mid-cycle pain in the last month was significantly associated with higher mean Central Sensitization Inventory score (48 ± 17 versus 36 ± 16, p < 0.001) and more months of prior hormonal suppressive therapy use (58 [14-120] versus 26 [0-109], p = 0.012). Abnormal anatomy at the time of surgery (e.g., endometrioma, ovarian adhesions) was not associated with mid-cycle pain in the last month. In this endometriosis cohort at a tertiary referral center, most participants reported mid-cycle pain in the last month, which was associated with central sensitization but was not clearly related to endometriosis anatomical distortion.
Balachandran S et al., 2026 · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reproductive outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and the influence of material and social deprivation on these outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included RPL patients seen at a specialized clinic between March 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on care period: pre-pandemic (March 1, 2018-February 29, 2020) and pandemic (March 1, 2020-February 28, 2022). Cumulative probabilities of birth were estimated using the cumulative incidence function within a competing risk framework, treating pregnancy loss as a competing event. Fine and Gray regression models calculated sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) of birth. 544 patients were included in the study, with 255 in the pre-pandemic group and 289 in the pandemic group. Individuals in the pandemic group were less likely to achieve pregnancy than those in the pre-pandemic group (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 - 0.66). Among those who conceived, the cumulative probability of live birth was 0.77 in both groups. Relative to individuals residing in high-social deprivation neighborhoods, those living in moderately deprived areas had higher sub-distribution hazards of live birth (adjusted sHR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.10; P = 0.003). Within specialized RPL care and a universal maternity care system, pregnancy rates were lower during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, among those who conceived, the probability of achieving a live birth remained similar between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
Bouchard TP et al., 2026 · Reproductive biomedicine online · Free to read
Does formation of the corpus luteum help to identify the day of ovulation on ultrasound when follicular collapse is missed, and how reliable are sonographers versus a review panel in identifying the day of ovulation on ultrasound? Sonographers in a clinic in Canada performed serial endovaginal ultrasound scans (six to eight per cycle) to identify the day of ovulation in regularly cycling women (n = 40) who were followed for one to five cycles (n = 85). The day of ovulation was identified by: (i) identification of the dominant follicle; (ii) disappearance of the dominant follicle; and (iii) identification and dating of the corpus luteum. The main outcome measures were inter-rater reliability between two sonographers, and Bland-Altman agreement between the supervising sonographer and a panel that reviewed each scan to identify the day of ovulation. Of the 85 menstrual cycles reviewed, two cycles did not have sufficient data to date ovulation, one cycle showed an incidental dermoid cyst, and 11 cycles showed anovulatory patterns. This left a total of 71 cycles (84%) for which intra-rater reliability between two sonographers for identifying the day of ovulation was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, P < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman agreement showed no significant difference in the estimated day of ovulation between the supervising sonographer and the panel (t = -0.28, P = 0.78). Corpus luteum criteria were necessary to help identify the day of ovulation in 14 of 71 cycles (20%). The estimated day of ovulation can be determined reliably on ultrasound by trained sonographers using collapse of the dominant follicle and formation of the corpus luteum based on six to eight scans per cycle.
Tucker DR et al., 2026 · Pain · Free to read
Predictive tools are lacking for pain-related outcomes after endometriosis surgery. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning-based clinical model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery. Registry data from a prospective longitudinal cohort at a tertiary referral center (2013-2020) was used for model development and validation. Participants underwent an index endometriosis surgery, and completed the pain subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) at baseline and 1-2-year follow-up. The outcome was poor pain-related quality of life defined as EHP-30 pain subscale above the 75th percentile for North America, at 1 to 2 years postsurgery. Thirty-two preoperative factors were evaluated, with final models retaining the top 10 most important predictors. Elastic net logistic regression, random forest (RF) and multilayer perceptron neural network models were developed. Internal validation was performed using 500 bootstrap samples, and a held-out test cohort. The study included 650 488 in the training cohort and 162 in a held-out test cohort. The RF model exhibited the most consistent discrimination, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, between the training cohort (0.768; 95% CI: 0.690-0.837) and test cohort (0.766; 95% CI: 0.676-0.863, Δ = -0.002). The RF model also demonstrated the best integrated calibration index (0.029) and highest net benefit. Final preoperative predictors for the RF model included baseline EHP-30 score, surgery type (conservative fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy), anxiety scores, depression scores, pain catastrophizing scale scores, abdominal wall pain, pelvic floor myalgia, smoking status, back pain, and race/ethnicity. We present the RF model as the Endometriosis Pain Index to aid preoperative counselling for endometriosis surgery.
Vannuccini S et al., 2019 · F1000Research · Free full text on PubMed Central
Adenomyosis is a benign uterine disorder in which endometrial glands and stroma are pathologically demonstrated in the uterine myometrium and it is considered a specific entity in the PALM-COEIN FIGO (polyp; adenomyosis; leiomyoma; malignancy and hyperplasia; coagulopathy; ovulatory dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified - International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Although it has always been considered the classic condition of multiparous women over 40 years old who have pain and heavy menstrual bleeding, diagnosed at hysterectomy, the epidemiological scenario has completely changed. Adenomyosis is increasingly identified in young women with pain, AUB, infertility, or no symptoms by using imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance. However, there is no agreement on the definition and classification of adenomyotic lesions from both the histopathology and the imaging point of view, and the diagnosis remains difficult and unclear. A uniform and shared reporting system needs to be implemented in order to improve our understanding on imaging features, their relationship with pathogenic theories, and their importance in terms of clinical symptoms and response to treatment. In fact, adenomyosis pathogenesis remains elusive and not a single theory can explain all of the different phenotypes of the disease. Furthermore, adenomyosis often coexists with other gynecological conditions, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids, increasing the heterogeneity of available data. Treatment requires a lifelong management plan as the disease has a negative impact on quality of life in terms of menstrual symptoms, fertility, and pregnancy outcome and has a high risk of miscarriage and obstetric complications.
Oliveira MAP et al., 2018 · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
Adenomyosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. The true prevalence is unknown and has been reported to range from 1 to 70%. It has a significantly negative impact on women's quality of life, causing abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and chronic pelvic pain. The definitive treatment for adenomyosis is hysterectomy, although it does not contemplate patients who wish to preserve their fertility. The aim of this paper is to discuss the latest evidence on the surgical techniques for the treatment of adenomyosis published in medical-scientific databases. A comprehensive literature search for articles published from 1996 to 2017 related to surgery for adenomyosis was made in Pubmed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, in English, by the following MeSH terms: adenomyosis, surgery, pathogenesis, dysmenorrhea and infertility. There is extensive evidence on several surgical approaches for the improvement of adenomyosis-related symptoms; however, there is no robust evidence that they are effective for infertility. The management of adenomyosis is quite complex and controversial. Complications after extensive uterine reconstruction, such as uterine rupture, should be considered and discussed with the patient. There are still limited data to support surgery effectiveness, especially for infertility, and further well-designed studies are required.
Yu O et al., 2020 · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Adenomyosis symptoms are disabling. Population-based data on incidence and prevalence of adenomyosis are lacking that could guide future evidence-based treatments and clinical management. To evaluate the incidence, 10-year secular trends, and prevalence of adenomyosis diagnoses and to describe symptoms and treatment patterns in a large U.S. cohort. We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of women aged 16-60 years in 2006-2015, enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a mixed-model health insurance and care delivery system. Adenomyosis diagnoses identified by ICD codes from the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th editions and potential covariates were extracted from computerized databases. Women with prior hysterectomy, and for incidence estimates women with prior adenomyosis diagnoses, were excluded. Linear trends in incidence rates over the 10-year study period were evaluated using Poisson regression. Rates and trend tests were examined for all women adjusting for age using direct standardization to the 2015 study population, by age groups, and by race/ethnicity. Chart reviews were performed to validate diagnostic accuracy of ICD codes in identifying adenomyosis incidence. Symptoms and treatment patterns at diagnosis and in the following 5 years were assessed. A total of 333,693 women contributed 1,185,855 woman-years (2006-2015) for incidence calculations. Associated symptom-related codes (menorrhagia or abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea or pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and infertility) were observed in 90.8%; 18.0% had co-occurrent endometriosis codes and 47.6% had co-occurrent uterine fibroid codes. The overall adenomyosis incidence was 1.03% or 28.9 per 10,000 woman-years, with a high of 30.6 in 2007 and a low of 24.4 in 2014. Overall age-adjusted estimated incidence rates declined during the 10-year study interval (linear trend P < .05). Incidence was highest for women aged 41-45 years (69.1 per 10,000 woman-years in 2008) and was higher for black (highest 44.6 per 10,000 woman-years in 2011) vs white women (highest 27.9 per 10,000 woman-years in 2010). Overall prevalence in 2015 was 0.8% and was highest among women aged 41-45 years (1.5%). Among the 624 potential adenomyosis cases identified by diagnostic codes in 2012-2015 and with sufficient information in the medical record to determine true case status, 490 were confirmed as incident cases, yielding a 78.5% (95% confidence interval, 75.1%, 81.7%) positive predictive value of adenomyosis ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for identifying an incident adenomyosis case. Health care burden was substantial: 82.0% of women had hysterectomies, nearly 70% had imaging studies suggestive of adenomyosis, and 37.6% used chronic pain medications. Adenomyosis burden to the individual and the health care system is high. Incidence rates are disproportionately high among black women. These findings are of concern, as currently available long-term medical therapies remain limited beyond hysterectomy. Our data and methodologies are novel and could serve as a foundation to guide clinicians and health care systems to develop clinical management plans and track outcomes for women with adenomyosis.
Tan J et al., 2018 · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Among the variety of treatment options to improve reproductive outcomes for infertile women with adenomyosis (AD), uterine-conserving surgery has shown varying success. Hence, we conducted a systematic review around the topic of fertility-sparing surgery across 18 studies and 1396 infertile women with focal and diffuse AD. Patients with focal AD showed mean pregnancy and miscarriage rates of 52.7% (range,14.3%-77.5%) and 21.1% (range, 0%-44.4%), respectively, whereas patients with diffuse AD had mean pregnancy and miscarriage rates of 34.1% (range, 9.4%-100%) and 21.7% (range, 12.5%-33.3%), respectively. Uterine rupture and preterm birth were observed in 6.8% (3/44) and 4.5% (2/44) of pregnant patients with diffuse AD versus 0% (0/35) and 10.9% (12/110) of patients with focal AD, respectively. No significant differences were observed between natural conception versus assisted reproductive technology (ART) with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment. Overall, patients with focal AD appeared to have higher pregnancy rates after conservative surgery compared with diffuse AD, whereas a higher incidence of uterine rupture was reported after surgery for diffuse AD. However, significant heterogeneity precludes any direct comparison, and prospective controlled trials are required to further elucidate the benefits of fertility-preserving surgery over medical or expectant management for AD-related infertility. In view of the debatable benefits of conservative surgery and the possible increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly in cases of diffuse AD, clinicians should consider surgery on a case-by-case basis because it may be appropriate for women with concurrent AD-associated pelvic pain or menorrhagia, younger infertile women who have failed medical management or older women with infertility despite ART, and those with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss or implantation failure.