Reproductive Endocrinology Ovarian Hormones

Absorption of oral progesterone is influenced by vehicle and particle size

Hargrove JT, Maxson WS, Wentz AC

Published October 1989 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 161(4), 948-951
DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90759-x PMID 2801843

RRM Academy Synopsis

Oral micronized progesterone in oil gave the highest blood levels

A 1989 study gave five oral progesterone preparations to six postmenopausal women and one man, in separate test sessions. All five raised blood levels. Micronized progesterone in oil produced a significantly higher average peak than the other four.

Study at a glance: Micronized progesterone in oil gave the highest blood levels
Study at a glance: Micronized progesterone in oil gave the highest blood levels. Source: Hargrove JT et al., 1989, PMID 2801843.

Key Findings

  • Seven volunteers, six postmenopausal women and one man, each took five preparations. Micronized progesterone was tested twice in each person: 14 tests, against 7 for the others.
  • Every preparation produced a significant rise in serum progesterone after oral dosing.
  • Micronized progesterone in oil had the highest average peak (p < 0.005). Its time to peak was the shortest: 2.0 ± 0.3 hours (mean ± SEM, p < 0.05).
  • The other four preparations did not differ significantly in peak, time to peak or area under the curve. Their times to peak ran from 3.2 to 4.1 hours.
  • Six hours after dosing, all preparations still sat above baseline and matched one another. The authors report no untoward effects in the 7 volunteers.

Interpretation

This study tested five oral progesterone forms in seven volunteers: six postmenopausal women and one man. Each fasted overnight before each test. The authors checked blood progesterone at set times after each dose. A repeat test with micronized progesterone showed some peak change between sessions, but the change was not significant. The authors credit micronizing plus oil for the top result, since oil alone or micronizing alone did not match it. The findings support more study of this combination.

RRM Context

The authors name luteal phase inadequacy as one use of progestins. They say synthetic progestins do not faithfully copy natural progesterone. NaProTechnology, developed by Dr. Thomas W. Hilgers, uses natural progesterone. How well it is absorbed by mouth depends on particle size and vehicle.

Abstract

The oral route of progesterone administration has long been considered impractical because of poor absorption and short biologic half-life. Recent reports suggest that micronization of progesterone enhances absorption and increases serum and tissue levels of progesterone. This study checks serum progesterone levels before and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after oral administration of 200 mg of progesterone in seven subjects. Progesterone was plain milled, micronized, plain milled in oil, micronized in oil, or micronized in enteric-coated capsules. All patients exhibited a significant increase in serum progesterone levels after oral progesterone administration. Mean peak progesterone levels (30.3 +/- 7.0 ng/ml) (p less than 0.005) were achieved with micronized progesterone in oil at 2.0 +/- 0.3 (p less than 0.05) hours after administration. Four types of oral progesterone had equivalent mean peak elevations and mean times to peak: plain milled, 9.6 +/- 2.5 ng/ml at 4.0 +/- 0.5 hours; micronized 13.2 +/- 2.4 ng/ml at 3.2 +/- 0.4 hours; plain milled in oil, 11.3 +/- 3.0 ng/ml at 4.0 +/- 0.5 hours; and micronized in enteric-coated capsules, 11.2 +/- 3.0 ng/ml at 4.1 +/- 0.7 hours. Contrary to traditional teaching, these data show that significant serum progesterone levels can be achieved by oral administration. Absorption can be significantly improved by the physical characteristics of the progesterone and the vehicle used with oral administration.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Progesterone and Progestins
PMID 2801843 2801843 DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90759-x 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90759-x Hargrove et al. 1989, Hargrove 1989