Assisted reproductive interventions and multiple birth

An audit of the obstetric outcome of 148 consecutive pregnancies from assisted conception: implications for neonatal services

McFaul PB et al., 1993·Br J Obstet Gynaecol

To assess the outcome of pregnancy following assisted conception. Cohort descriptive study. Unit of Reproductive Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School. One hundred and forty-eight consecutive assisted conceptions. Patient characteristics and outcome of pregnancy. Seventy-nine percent of mothers were aged between 26 and 35 years (mean 31.4). The main causes of infertility were tubal (48%), unexplained (35%), anovulatory (8%) and male factor (8%). Primary infertility accounted for 61% of cases and 82% of pregnancies occurred within 3 treatment cycles. Thirty-five (24%) pregnancies miscarried before 14 weeks and 7 (5%) between 15 and 24 weeks gestation. One hundred and three pregnancies resulted in 136 liveborn infants. There was one neonatal death. Thirty-five babies were admitted to SCBU. Antenatally, 13% of patients were admitted to hospital with hypertension and 8% with APH; 50% of multiple and 13% of singleton pregnancies were delivered prematurely, 68% following preterm labour. There were 28 sets of twins (four miscarried at less than 24 weeks) and four sets of triplets. Multiple pregnancy was not associated with cause of infertility, treatment, age or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Seventy-eight per cent of singletons and 50% of multipara were delivered vaginally. Our data confirm the high incidence of pregnancy loss and preterm delivery associated with assisted conception once allowing for the high rate of multiple pregnancies. The effect of assisted conception programme on health services is discussed.

Outcome of twin, triplet, and quadruplet in vitro fertilization pregnancies: the Norfolk experience

Seoud MA et al., 1992·Fertil Steril

To review the maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) multiple pregnancies. Retrospective analysis of data collected from office and hospital records and from questionnaires sent to patients, their obstetricians, and pediatricians. Patients (all with private insurance carriers) enrolled in an academic IVF program (The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine). PATIENTS, All IVF pregnancies resulting in one or more gestational sacs on the initial ultrasound at 6 to 7 weeks were reviewed. The frequency and severity of obstetrical and neonatal complications and the perinatal mortality of IVF twins, triplets, and quadruplets were compared. These were also compared with non-IVF multiple pregnancies. From 1982 to 1990, 629 IVF pregnancies progressed beyond 20 weeks; 115 twins (18.3%), 15 triplets (2.4%), and 4 quadruplets (0.6%). There was a high incidence of antenatal complications such as abortions (30.3%, 42%, and 20%), premature labor (41.5%, 92.3%, and 75%), pregnancy-induced hypertension (17.0%, 38.6%, and 50%), and gestational diabetes mellitus (3.1%, 38.5%, and 25%) for twins, triplets, and quadruplets, respectively. The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.5 +/- 3.7, 31.8 +/- 2.7, and 31.0 +/- 1.7 weeks, respectively. There was also a proportionate progressive increase in neonatal complications. The mean weights were 2,473 +/- 745, 1,666 +/- 441 and 1,414 +/- 368 g, respectively. Twins (22.7%), 64.1% of triplets, and 75% of quadruplets needed admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and remained for an average of 12.0 +/- 2.3, 17.4 +/- 14.0, and 57.8 +/- 17.9 days, respectively. There was no difference in the mean Apgar scores or the incidence of congenital malformations in the three groups. The corrected perinatal mortality rates were 38.5, 0.0, and 0.0 per thousand live births, respectively. Triplet and quadruplet IVF pregnancies have increased obstetrical and neonatal complications compared with IVF twins. The perinatal mortality and the incidence of congenital malformations are, however, comparable in all three groups.

Endometriosis Surgery: Debates About Restorative Reproductive Medicine

Humphries LA, 2026·Obstetrics and gynecology

For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.

Spontaneous abortion rate in patients with endometriosis

Yang X et al., 2026·Obstet Gynecol