General Gynecology · Pelvic Pain
Yang EC, Koenig NA, Gong M, Brotto LA, Barr AM, Lee T, Yong PJ, Geoffrion R
Cite this paper
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
Open access
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Open Access
Free full text on PubMed Central (PMC10121619)
Author affiliations
1 institution
04g6gva85 Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
Myofascial tenderness is present in most chronic pelvic pain conditions and causes significant distress to patients. Treatment is challenging and often not curative. Cannabis is often used for self-management of chronic pelvic pain. However, we do not know which concentrations and routes of administration are most acceptable to users. We aimed to investigate patterns and willingness of cannabis product use among both habitual users and non-users with myofascial pelvic pain (MPP), to inform therapeutic development.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of questionnaire responses from female patients with MPP from two tertiary pelvic pain centers. We aimed for a convenience sample of 100 responses with representation from both centers. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 with pelvic floor muscle tenderness on standard gynecologic examination. We collected information on demographics, pelvic pain history, cannabis use status, cannabis use preferences, validated opioid misuse risk assessment, and interest in using gynecologic cannabis products and used descriptive analyses.
77/135 (57 %) questionnaire respondents were cannabis users and 58 (43 %) were non-users. Most users consume cannabis daily, (48.1 %) orally (66.2 %) or by smoking (60.7 %), and rated cannabis as effective at relieving pelvic pain. 37/58 (63.8 %) non-cannabis users responded that they would be willing to use cannabis for pelvic pain. Lack of information and potential adverse effects were the most common reasons for unwillingness to use. Approximately 3 of 4 respondents were willing to try vaginal or vulvar application of cannabis products for pelvic pain.
This cross-sectional study describes cannabis use patterns in MPP patients. Topical vulvar and vaginal cannabis products are of strong interest to both cannabis users and non-users and warrant further research.
Goodwin E et al., 2025 · BMC women's health · Free full text on PubMed Central
Endometriosis is a chronic and inflammatory condition that often presents with chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, thus having important effects on quality of life. There are two proposed hypotheses to describe the known association between endometriosis and depression and anxiety: (1) the disease hypothesis, where the inflammatory nature of endometriosis is driving increased risk for depression and anxiety; and (2) the pain hypothesis, where it is the painful symptoms underlying the increased risk. We aimed to shed further light on these two hypotheses by assessing the risk for depression and/or anxiety in three groups of patients pathologically assessed for endometriosis: symptomatic endometriosis patients (Symp Endo), symptomatic patients with no pathological endometriosis diagnosis (Symp No Endo), and asymptomatic endometriosis patients (Asymp Endo). This study included pathologically-confirmed endometriosis patients identified from the pathology records of Vancouver Coastal Health Authority between 2000 and 2008. These data were linked with population-based administrative health data for follow-up to 2017. Depression and anxiety were identified through diagnostics codes from health services use data and prescriptions for antidepressants. Bivariate analyses were performed to assess differences between groups. Cox proportional hazards models were run to generate hazard ratios for incident depression and/or anxiety between the groups. There were 2729 people in Symp Endo, 585 in Symp No Endo, and 326 in Asymp Endo. Symp No Endo was more likely than Symp Endo to be visiting a physician for pelvic pain and to be taking prescription-level pain medications (p < 0.001). After adjusting for several covariates, Symp No Endo had a significantly higher risk of incident depression and/or anxiety (adjusted HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41) compared to Symp Endo. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of depression and/or anxiety between Symp Endo and Asymp Endo (adjusted HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.17). These results point toward the pain focused hypotheses as Symp No Endo patients were at higher risk for depression/anxiety than the Symp Endo group. However, the results also suggest the disease hypothesis is at play, because the Symp Endo and Asymp Endo groups were at the same level of risk for depression/anxiety.
Cook E et al., 2026 · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
This scoping review aims to evaluate recent studies that examine the relationship between dyspareunia and neurophysiologic factors, and to synthesize their results as it pertains to the development and treatment of introital/vulvar dyspareunia and deep dyspareunia A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science (Clarivate), Psycinfo (ProQuest), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) to find peer reviewed studies written in English published in 2000 or later that discussed how neurophysiology is related to dyspareunia. Search terms: dyspareunia; painful intercourse; genito-pelvic pain; penetration disorder; neuropsychology; central nervous system sensitization; neur; central sensitization. A total of 1101 studies were screened and 108 were included in the review. Abstract and full text screening were performed by 4 authors. Articles were also excluded if they did not include an objective diagnostic tool or objective treatment outcome of dyspareunia. We included original peer-reviewed published research in the form of randomized control trials, cohort studies, case control studies, case series of greater than 20 participants, and systematic reviews. Multiple study types were noted: 22 randomized control trials, 9 prospective cohort studies, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 30 case control, 16 case series, 17 cross-sectional, and 11 systematic reviews. Of these articles, 72 focused on introital/superficial dyspareunia, 23 focused on deep dyspareunia, and 13 on both. Data was synthesized in text and table format, separated by type of dyspareunia (introital vs deep) and either etiology/diagnosis or treatment. There are complex neurophysiologic mechanisms that influence both introital and deep dyspareunia, highlighting the roles of peripheral and central sensitization, nerve fiber density, and neuroplasticity in this condition. There are several promising treatments, including TENS, botulinum toxin A, physical therapy, and various multimodal approaches; but further research is needed to establish standardized therapeutic guidelines.
Gentles AJ et al., 2025 · The journal of pain · Free to read
There is increasing recognition that nociplastic pain and central sensitization may play a role in endometriosis-associated pain. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Minor (PSQ-M) evaluates subjective widespread pain sensitivity, and is linked to pain outcomes in chronic pain populations. However, evidence connecting the PSQ-M to central sensitization in endometriosis is limited. Using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) as a comparison, this study compared the PSQ-M as a clinical proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis individuals. Data collected from 983 endometriosis participants (mean age of 34 years), between January 2020 and December 2022, were analyzed from a prospective registry. A significant but weak positive correlation was observed between PSQ-M and CSI scores (r=0.099, p<0.001). A significant but weak correlation was found between the number of central sensitivity syndromes and pelvic pain-related comorbidities with the PSQ-M (r=0.093, p<0.001), compared to a stronger correlation with the CSI (r=0.687, p<0.05). PSQ-M scores were not significantly associated with baseline (r=0.013, p=0.797) or post-operative (r=-0.046, p=0.801) quality-of-life. There was no change in the PSQ-M and a small change in CSI after endometriosis surgery, suggesting that surgical treatment of endometriosis does not directly address central sensitization. In conclusion, the PSQ-M may not be the optimal clinical proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis. This study evaluates the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire - Minor (PSQ-M) as a proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis. The PSQ-M showed weak correlations with central sensitivity syndromes and pain scores and was not associated with post-surgical quality-of-life, suggesting it may not be the optimal tool for assessing central sensitization in endometriosis.
Wahl K et al., 2024 · Sexual medicine · Free full text on PubMed Central
Deep dyspareunia affects 50% of people with endometriosis. The Ohnut is a set of interlocking rings that fit over the penis/insertive object. One or more rings can be used to limit insertion depth and reduce deep dyspareunia. We conducted a pilot, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the feasibility of the study design and the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the Ohnut. Participants were recruited from a tertiary center for endometriosis. Eligibility criteria were surgically confirmed endometriosis, age 19-49 years, monogamous sexual relationship with a partner willing to participate in the study, and no comorbid superficial dyspareunia, anxiety, or depression. Couples were randomized into an intervention group or a waitlist control group using a 1:1 allocation ratio. All couples had sex as normal during weeks 1 to 4 (baseline period), and couples in the intervention group used the Ohnut with sex during weeks 5 to 10 (intervention period) while controls had sex as normal. Patient participants used daily diaries to record sexual activity and deep dyspareunia score (0-10) for the 10-week study. Intervention group participants completed an acceptability questionnaire at the end of the study. The primary outcomes were feasibility of the study and acceptability of the Ohnut. We also assessed differences in deep dyspareunia scores in the participants who used the Ohnut compared to the control participants who did not. We recruited approximately 5 couples per month of active recruitment. Of 864 potentially eligible participants, we successfully contacted 44.7% (n = 386), of whom 8.0% (n = 31) consented, 64.8% (n = 250) were ineligible, and 27.2% (n = 105) declined. Thirty-one couples were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, and 17 couples completed the study. Intervention group couples used the Ohnut for an average of 72.4% (32.7%) of sexual encounters during the intervention period. The mean acceptability index score for the Ohnut was 0.83 (0.078) among patients and 0.83 (0.049) among partners (index between 0 and 1). After controlling for baseline deep dyspareunia, there was a significant difference in the intervention period mean deep dyspareunia scores between the control and intervention group (4.69 (2.44) vs 2.46 (1.82), P = .012). We identified preliminary evidence for the acceptability and efficacy of the Ohnut among both patients and partners, suggesting that the Ohnut may be a useful stand-alone or adjuvant management tool for endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. Strengths of this study were the "real-world" use of the Ohnut and data collection from both patients and partners. Limitations of the study design included the strict eligibility criteria that affected feasibility and generalizability. This pilot RCT indicated that the Ohnut may be an acceptable and effective intervention to reduce endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. We identified opportunities to improve design for a larger RCT. This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04370444).
Geoffrion R et al., 2021 · Obstetrics and gynecology
To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of recreational cannabis use in women with pelvic pain, and to examine the influence of cannabis legalization on these parameters. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry of women with self-reported moderate-to-severe pelvic pain referred to a tertiary care clinic in Vancouver, Canada, 2013-2019. We excluded patients aged 18 years or younger and those with unknown data on cannabis use. Demographic, clinical, and validated questionnaire data were extracted for two main analyses: 1) comparison of current cannabis users with current nonusers, and 2) comparison of current cannabis users who entered the registry before cannabis legalization (October 17, 2018) with those who entered the registry on or after legalization. Overall, 14.9% (509/3,426) of patients were classified as current cannabis users. Compared with nonusers, cannabis users were younger (P<.001), had lower levels of education (P<.001) and lower household income (P<.001), were taking opioids (P<.001), antiinflammatories (P=.003), neuromodulators (P=.020), and herbal medications (P<.001) more frequently. They had worse questionnaire scores for depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, quality of life, and pelvic pain severity (P<.001 for all). After cannabis legalization, prevalence of current cannabis use increased from 13.3% (366/2,760) to 21.5% (143/666) (P<.001). Compared with prelegalization, postlegalization users were associated with higher levels of education (P<.001), worse anxiety (P=.036), and worse pain catastrophizing (P<.001) scores. They were taking fewer antiinflammatories (P<.001), neuroleptics (P=.027) and daily opioids or narcotics (P=.026), but more herbal medications (P=.010). Recreational cannabis use increased among patients with pelvic pain after legalization in Canada. Cannabis users had worse pain-related morbidities. Postlegalization, cannabis users were less likely to require daily opioids compared with cannabis users before legalization. The role, perceived benefits, and possible risks of cannabis for pelvic pain require further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02911090.
Zipper R et al., 2021 · Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · Free full text on PubMed Central
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and debilitating condition that affects millions of U.S. women. Most treatments are ineffective and innovative new therapies are desperately needed. Large, controlled studies show that photobiomodulation (PBM) can reduce pain in patients with other chronic pain conditions, such as low back pain, neck pain, and fibromyalgia. The objective of this pilot study was to determine if transvaginal PBM (TV-PBM) can reduce pain in women with CPP. We conducted a before and after, observational, pilot study. Patients completed the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at baseline, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after nine treatments of TV-PBM. Clinicians completed the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessing patient illness severity at the same time. Wilcoxon rank-sum t-tests and effect size using Cohen's d coefficient (low effect size if d < 0.2, medium if 0.2 < d > 8, and high if d > 0.8) was used to measure degree of pain improvement, which was also considered clinically significant if pain reduction was >30%. Thirteen women completed 9 treatments, and 10 women were successfully followed to 6 months. At baseline, the mean SF-MPQ score was 19.7 (standard deviation [SD] ± 5.9). Compared with baseline, 60% improved; the mean SF-MPQ score decreased to 10.0 (SD ±7.5, p = 0.004, d = 1.6) at 1 week after treatment, to 9.7 (SD ±7.9, p = 0.005, d = 1.7) at 3 months, and 8.2 (SD ±8.1, p = 0.002, d = 1.9) at 6 months. Transvaginal PBM provided significant and sustained pain relief to women with CPP up to 6 months. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings, however, in this initial pilot, TV-PBM shows promise.
Yosef A et al., 2016 · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Chronic pelvic pain affects ∼15% of women, and is associated with significant societal cost and impact on women's health. Identifying factors involved in chronic pelvic pain is challenging due to its multifactorial nature and confounding between potential factors. For example, while some women with endometriosis have chronic pelvic pain, there may be comorbid conditions that are implicated in the chronic pelvic pain rather than the endometriosis itself. We sought to explore multifactorial variables independently associated with the severity of chronic pelvic pain in women. We used baseline cross-sectional data from an ongoing prospective cohort, collected from patient online questionnaires, physical examination, and physician review of medical records. Participants were recruited from a tertiary referral center for endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, from December 2013 through April 2015. Exclusion criteria included menopausal status or age >50 years. Primary outcome was self-reported severity of chronic pelvic pain in the last 3 months (0-10 numeric rating scale). Potential associated factors ranged from known pain conditions assessed by standard diagnostic criteria, validated psychological questionnaires, musculoskeletal physical exam findings, as well as pain-related, reproductive, medical/surgical, familial, demographic, and behavioral characteristics. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, or Spearman test were used to identify variables with an association with the primary outcome (P < .05), followed by multivariable linear regression to control for confounding and to identify independent associations with the primary outcome (P < .05). Overall, 656 women were included (87% consent rate), of whom 55% were diagnosed with endometriosis. The following factors were independently associated with higher severity of chronic pelvic pain: abdominal wall pain (P = .005), pelvic floor tenderness (P = .004), painful bladder syndrome (P = .019), higher score on Pain Catastrophizing Scale (P < .001), adult sexual assault (P = .043), higher body mass index (P = .023), current smoking (P = .049), and family history of chronic pain (P = .038). Severity of chronic pelvic pain was similar between women with and without endometriosis. Multifactorial variables independently associated with severity of chronic pelvic pain were identified, ranging from myofascial/musculoskeletal, urological, family history, and psycho-social factors. Continued research is required to validate these factors and to determine whether any are potentially modifiable for the management of chronic pelvic pain.
Allaire C et al., 2024 · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
To provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of chronic pelvic pain in females. This guideline is specific to pelvic pain in adolescent and adult females and excluded literature that looked at pelvic pain in males. It also did not address genital pain. BENEFITS, HARMS, The intent is to benefit patients with chronic pelvic pain by providing an evidence-based approach to management. Access to certain interventions such as physiotherapy and psychological treatments, and to interdisciplinary care overall, may be limited by costs and service availability. Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1990 to 2020 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to chronic pelvic pain, including diagnosis, overlapping pain conditions, central sensitization, management, medications, surgery, physiotherapy, psychological therapies, alternative and complementary therapies, and multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary care. The committee reviewed the literature and available data and used a consensus approach to develop recommendations. Only articles in English and pertaining to female subjects were included. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). Family physicians, gynaecologists, urologists, pain specialists, physiotherapists, and mental health professionals. Management of chronic pelvic pain should consider multifactorial contributors, including underlying central sensitization/nociplastic pain, and employ an interdisciplinary biopsychosocial approach that includes pain education, physiotherapy, and psychological & medical treatments. RECOMMENDATIONS.