Corrigendum to “The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review” [Fertil Steril 2026;125:993-1001]
Ganci D,Steeper M,Polyakov A,Sunkara SK,Wilkinson J,Lensen S
Ganci, D., Steeper, M., Polyakov, A., Sunkara, S. K., Wilkinson, J., & Lensen, S. (2026). Corrigendum to “The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review” [Fertil Steril 2026;125:993-1001]. Fertility and Sterility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.06.029
Ganci D, Steeper M, Polyakov A, Sunkara SK, Wilkinson J, Lensen S. Corrigendum to “The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review” [Fertil Steril 2026;125:993-1001]. Fertility and Sterility. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.06.029
Ganci, D., et al. "Corrigendum to “The effectiveness and safety of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM) compared to assisted reproductive technology or medically unassisted conception: a systematic review” [Fertil Steril 2026;125:993-1001]." Fertility and Sterility, 2026.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
Open access
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Open Access
Abstract
The authors would like to inform you of an error on p. 994, column 2 of the article, which states that “Studies demonstrate that < 70% of embryos produced by women aged ≥40 may be aneuploid (14).” The corrected sentence is “Studies demonstrate that > 70% of embryos produced by women aged ≥40 may be aneuploid (14).”
By this author
Restorative Care and Assisted Reproduction · Outcome Comparisons
