Diagnostics · Endometrial Assessment

Defining the proliferative phase endometrial defect

Bromer JG, Aldad TS, Taylor HS

Published March 2009 Fertility and sterility, 91(3), 698-704
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.066 PMID 18314107 PMC PMC2699408

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate proliferative phase endometrial development in a heterogeneous infertility population.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

University-based infertility practice.

Patients

Two hundred forty-six treatment cycles.

Interventions

Clomiphene citrate or FSH ovarian stimulation, followed by IUI or IVF.

Main Outcome Measures

Endometrial thickness according to transvaginal ultrasonography; clinical pregnancy rate.

Results

Endometrial growth began from a nadir of approximately 4.5 mm on cycle day 4 and increased linearly to a plateau of approximately 10 mm on cycle day 9. This same pattern was observed in all cycles, regardless of pregnancy, drug, or underlying diagnosis. Follicle-stimulating hormone-stimulated cycles showed a significantly increased endometrial thickness compared with clomiphene citrate cycles (10.1 vs. 8.3 mm). Maximum endometrial thickness achieved showed a correlation with age, body mass index, and maximum E(2) level. Subjects who carried a primary diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, or recurrent pregnancy loss all achieved a significantly lower peak endometrial thickness than control subjects. There was a trend toward increased endometrial thickness in cycles resulting in pregnancy compared with those not (10.1 vs. 9.6 mm, respectively).

Conclusions

Endometrial development follows a predictable pattern, with a plateau in growth at cycle day 9. Diseases associated with infertility manifest a proliferative phase defect that can be recognized clinically.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Diagnostics › Endometrial Assessment › Luteal Phase Biopsy · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Physiology › Follicular Phase
Jason G Bromer, Tamir S Aldad, Hugh S Taylor
J Bromer, T Aldad, H Taylor
PMID 18314107 18314107 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.066 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.066 Bromer et al. 2009, Bromer 2009