Cervical Conditions · Cervical Insufficiency
Michaels WH et al., 1986 · Am J Obstet Gynecol
To evaluate the feasibility of the use of serial ultrasound measurements of cervical length, membrane protrusion, and dilatation to discriminate between the competent and the incompetent cervix, 107 at-risk patients and 30 control subjects were examined prospectively. Patients were divided into five groups based on treatment and method of diagnosis. Epidemiologic, ultrasound, and outcome data were analyzed. Means and standard deviations for ultrasound measurements were established. Highly significant differences between all prediagnostic and postdiagnostic-pretreatment measurements were found (p less than 0.001). Highly significant differences were also found between all postdiagnostic-pretreatment and postdiagnostic-posttreatment measurements (p less than 0.001). No significant differences between prediagnostic and postdiagnostic-posttreatment measurements were noted. The incidence of preterm delivery was significantly higher among untreated diagnosed patients (p less than 0.01). By combined clinical and ultrasound criteria 51 patients (47.7%) were identified as not having cervical incompetency. Fifty-six patients (52.3%) were diagnosed.
Cervical Conditions · Cervical Insufficiency
Guzman ER et al., 1996 · Am J Obstet Gynecol
Our purpose was to determine whether perioperative transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the incompetent cervix treated with emergency cerclage is predictive of pregnancy outcome. Twenty-nine women who underwent emergency cerclage at 16 to 26 weeks of gestation had transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix within 48 hours before and after surgery and at least three times thereafter until 28 weeks of gestation. The following measurements were obtained: (1) funnel width, (2) funnel length, (3) endocervical canal length, (4) the distance between the internal and external os, (5) upper cervix (length of closed endocervical canal above the cervical cerclage), (6) lower cervix (endocervical canal length below suture), and (7) cervical index (1+ Funnel length/Endocervical canal length). Values are reported as the median in millimeters, and statistical analysis was performed by use of the Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman rank correlation, 2 x 2 contingency tables, and multiple regression analysis with significance set at p < 0.05. Cerclage procedures resulted in significant improvement in postoperative median measurements of funnel width (15 vs 4.0 mm, p < 0.0001), funnel length (29 vs 3 mm, p < 0.0001), and endocervical canal length (2 vs 27 mm, p < 0.0001). There was a significant relationship between gestational age at delivery and the following preoperative funnel width (r = -0.51, p = 0.007), postoperative endocervical canal length (r = 0.39, p = 0.04), length of the lower cervix (r = 0.39, p = 0.038), and the cervical index (r = -0.39, p = 0.038). An upper cervical length < 10 mm was a good predictor of delivery before 36 weeks of gestation, sensitivity 85.7% (12/14), specificity 66.7% (10/15), positive predictive value 70.6% (12/17), negative predictive value 83% (10/12), and Fisher's exact p = 0.008. Postoperatively all patients had upper cervical lengths < 10 mm by 28 weeks of gestation. Preoperative digital assessments of cervical dilatation before surgery did not correlate with gestational age at birth (r = -0.031, p = 0.36). In cases of cervical incompetence treated with emergency cerclage, perioperative transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the cervix reveals that the procedure results in improved ultrasonographic status of the cervix and that the ultrasonographic cervical findings before and after surgery correlate with pregnancy outcome.
Labor and Birth · Physiologic Birth
Zalar RW Jr, 1996 · Obstet Gynecol
To characterize the continuum between normal and preterm labor to prevent spontaneous preterm birth and low birth weight. Between August 1, 1992, and November 30, 1993, obstetric patients from a large managed care medical group were assigned in rotation to five private practice offices for pregnancy care. In the study office (374 births), a systematic approach of visit-by-visit screening, patient education, selective office evaluation of cervical change by transvaginal ultrasound examination, outpatient modification of activity, and graded oral or subcutaneous tocolysis was used; inpatient tocolysis was used only when outpatient management failed. In the comparison offices (1391 births), transvaginal ultrasound was not used and conventional methods were used at the discretion of the attending physicians. Birth weights below 1500 g (P = .008; odds ratio [OR] 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-1.32), 2000 g (P = .21; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.88), and 2500 g (P = .008; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83) occurred significantly less often in the study group than in the comparison group. The difference in spontaneous preterm births under 2500 g was also significant (P < .001; OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.58). By emphasizing transvaginal ultrasound and graded outpatient tocolysis, the diagnosis and management of preterm prelabor was associated with a reduction in the rate of spontaneous preterm birth and low birth weight infants.
Sexual Pain · Dyspareunia
MacLeod RGK et al., 2023 · The journal of sexual medicine
Approximately half of people with endometriosis experience deep dyspareunia; however, there is no means of objective self-testing of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia.
The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability, test-retest reliability, and validity of a vaginal insert for a self-assessment of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia.
Participants were recruited from a tertiary endometriosis center. Inclusion criteria were: 19 to 49 years of age, self-reported deep dyspareunia of ≥4 of 10, and surgically confirmed endometriosis. Participants completed 2 self-assessments using the vaginal insert to self-assess tenderness at the right and left pelvic floor, bladder, cervix-uterus, and posterior cul-de-sac (vaginal fornix). The participants recorded tenderness at each pelvic site and completed a questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the vaginal insert to assess deep dyspareunia. Test-retest reliability was assessed by correlating the tenderness scores between the 2 assessment dates. Over a 4-week period, the participants also recorded deep dyspareunia severity at each penetrative vaginal sex encounter. Validity was assessed by correlating vaginal insert tenderness to deep dyspareunia severity, and also to tenderness reported on a prior gynecologic pelvic examination.
The main outcome measures were the acceptability index score, tenderness (0-10) at each pelvic site, and prospective deep dyspareunia scores (0-10) over 4 weeks.
There were 19 participants (mean age 34 ± 7 years) who completed the study. The majority identified as female (94.7%), heterosexual (89.5%), and white (89.5%). The median acceptability index score was 0.72 (interquartile range, 0.66-0.81). For test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.79 (P = .001) for the left pelvic floor, 0.82 (P < .001) for the right pelvic floor, 0.54 (P = .07) for the bladder, 0.89 (P < .001) for the cervix-uterus, and 0.77 (P = .003) for the cul-de-sac. The correlation between the highest self-assessed mean tenderness in each participant and self-reported deep dyspareunia over 4 weeks was r = 0.32, but correlations for each pelvic site varied significantly. Tenderness at each site on prior gynecologist pelvic exam was associated with higher self-assessed mean tenderness with the vaginal insert in each participant (effect sizes = 0.42-0.88).
The vaginal insert is acceptable and reliable for the objective self-assessment of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia, with initial evidence of validity.
A strength was the inclusion of participants who were avoiding sexual activity and a limitation was the small sample size.
Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to further establish the validity of the vaginal insert for the self-assessment of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia.