Reproductive Endocrinology Luteal Phase

Does a short luteal phase correlate with an increased risk of miscarriage? A cohort study

Duane M, Schliep K, Porucznik CA, Najmabadi S, Stanford JB

Published December 9, 2022 BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 922
DOI 10.1186/s12884-022-05195-9 PMID 36482355 PMC PMC9733331

RRM Academy Synopsis

No link between short luteal phases and miscarriage in 252 women

In this cohort, women with short luteal phases before conception miscarried at similar rates. The analysis pooled four cohorts of couples who charted with the Creighton Model. Of 252 women who got pregnant, 48 miscarried. The adjusted incident risk ratio for at least one luteal phase under 10 days was 1.01.

Key Findings

  • Women with a luteal phase under 10 days in at least one cycle had an adjusted incident risk ratio of miscarriage of 1.01 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.80).
  • Under the stricter cutoff of under 8 days (32 women, 7 miscarriages), the adjusted incident risk ratio was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.57, 2.38).
  • Five women had luteal phases under 10 days in all 3 cycles before conception; 2 miscarried. The incident risk ratio was 2.14 (95% CI: 0.70, 6.55).
  • Miscarriage occurred in 25 of 85 women aged 30 and older (29.4%) and 23 of 167 women under 30 (13.8%). Luteal phase length did not change the older group's higher risk.
  • Miscarriage occurred in 17 of 46 women in the iNEST cohort of couples with subfertility or a history of miscarriage (37%), the highest of the four cohorts.

Interpretation

This cohort study followed 252 women who got pregnant while charting with the Creighton Model, pooled from four cohorts. A short luteal phase, even when it recurred across several cycles, was not linked with a higher miscarriage rate. Women 30 and older had a higher miscarriage rate than younger women, and this held regardless of luteal phase length. The authors note that recurrent short luteal phases deserve a closer look in future cohorts. The findings support larger charting studies that add progesterone measurements.

RRM Context

Daily Creighton Model charts gave the authors each cycle's luteal length directly, the kind of cycle-level data a workup built on charting can draw on. Paternal age tracked closely with maternal age (Pearson r = 0.55).

Abstract

Background

Miscarriage is defined as spontaneous loss of pregnancy prior to 20 weeks gestation. With an estimated risk of 15% of clinically confirmed pregnancies ending in miscarriage, it is the most common adverse event in pregnancy. Woman's age is the primary risk factor for miscarriage, while medical conditions, including hormonal abnormalities, are also associated. Progesterone is essential for maintaining pregnancy. A short luteal phase may reflect inadequate levels of progesterone production, but it is unclear whether a short luteal phase correlates with an increase in the risk of miscarriage.

Methods

Using a cohort study design, we conducted a secondary data analysis from four cohorts of couples who used a standardized protocol to track biomarkers of the female cycles. A short luteal phase was defined as less than 10 days, with < 11, < 9, and < 8 days as alternate definitions in sensitivity analyses. We included women who experienced a pregnancy with a known outcome, identified the length of the luteal phase in up to 3 cycles prior to conception and assessed the relationship with miscarriage using a modified Poisson regression analysis, adjusting for demographic characteristics, smoking, alcohol use and previous pregnancy history.

Results

In our sample of 252 women; the overall miscarriage rate was 18.7%. The adjusted incident risk ratio of miscarriage in women who had at least one short luteal phase < 10 days, compared to those who had none, was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.80) Similar null risk was found when assessing alternative lengths of short luteal phase. Women who had short luteal phases < 10 days in all 3 cycles prior to the conception cycle had an incident risk ratio of 2.14 (95% CI: 0.7, 6.55).

Conclusions

Our study found that a short luteal phase in the three cycles prior to conception was not associated with higher rates of miscarriage in an international cohort of women tracking their cycles, but our sample size was limited. Further research to determine if short luteal phases or luteal phase deficiency is associated with early pregnancy losses among preconception cohorts with daily tracking of cycle parameters, in addition to progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin levels, is warranted. Additionally, future studies should include women with recurrent short luteal phases as a more likely risk factor than isolated short luteal phases.

Read the guide

Topics

By this author

Related research

Reproductive Endocrinology › Luteal Phase › Luteal Phase Deficiency · Pregnancy › Early Pregnancy › Miscarriage · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Physiology › Luteal Phase
Marguerite Duane, Karen Schliep, Christina A Porucznik, Shahpar Najmabadi, Joseph B Stanford
M Duane, K Schliep, C Porucznik, S Najmabadi, Joe Stanford, Joey Stanford, J Stanford
PMID 36482355 36482355 DOI 10.1186/s12884-022-05195-9 10.1186/s12884-022-05195-9 Duane et al. 2022, Duane 2022