To determine if racial differences exist in receipt of minimally invasive hysterectomy (defined as total vaginal hysterectomy [TVH] and total laparoscopic hysterectomy [TLH]) compared with an open approach (total abdominal hysterectomy [TAH]) within a universally insured patient population.
Design
Retrospective data analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting
The 2006-2010 national TRICARE (universal insurance coverage to US Armed Services members and their dependents) longitudinal claims data.
Patients
Women aged 18 years and above who underwent hysterectomy stratified into 4 racial groups: white, African American, Asian, and "other."
Intervention
Receipt of hysterectomy (TAH, TVH, or TLH).
MEASUREMENTS AND
Main Results
We used risk-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models to determine the relative risk ratios of receipt of TVH and TLH compared with TAH in each racial group compared with referent category of white patients for benign conditions. Among 33 015 patients identified, 60.82% (n = 20 079) were white, 26.11% (n = 8621) African American, 4.63% (n = 1529) Asian, and 8.44% (n = 2786) other. Most hysterectomies (83.9%) were for benign indications. Nearly 42% of hysterectomies (n = 13 917) were TAH, 27% (n = 8937) were TVH, and 30% (n = 10 161) were TLH. Overall, 36.37% of white patients received TAH compared with 53.40% of African American patients and 51.01% of Asian patients (p < .001). On multinomial logistic regression analyses, African American patients were significantly less likely than white patients to receive TVH (relative risk ratio [RRR], .63; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58-.69) or TLH (RRR, .65; 95% CI, .60-.71) compared with TAH. Similarly, Asian patients were less likely than white patients to receive TVH (RRR, .71; 95% CI, .60-.84) or TLH (RRR, .69; 95% CI, .58-.83) compared with TAH. Analyses by benign indications for surgery showed similar trends.
Conclusion
We demonstrate that racial minority patients are less likely to receive a minimally invasive surgical approach compared with an open abdominal approach despite universal insurance coverage. Further work is warranted to better understand factors other than insurance access that may contribute to racial differences in surgical approach to hysterectomies.
Survey of 1,010 adults across the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, and Canada (March 2026) who are trying to conceive, tried in the past five years, or plan to try within five years. IVF awareness is high (89%) but only 58% would consider pursuing it, a 31-point gap, the largest of any option surveyed, driven by perceptions of cost and invasiveness. 89% of women said they would prefer to try a less invasive fertility option before pursuing IVF if supported by clinical guidance; 83% would choose lower-cost options first. Metabolic health support generated the highest patient appetite of any pathway: 84% would consider it and 85% would seek more information, yet only 44% had a clinical conversation about metabolic health during their fertility journey. Mens health support showed a similar pattern (80% would consider; only 43% of men had a provider conversation). 78% said better understanding of non-IVF options would make them more likely to pursue those options first. 49% learned about their fertility options only after beginning to try to conceive; 58% wished they had received more fertility education before trying (70% among those mid-journey). 84% agreed access to multiple fertility options would increase decision confidence, the most widely endorsed statement in the survey. 80% would be more likely to stay with an employer offering comprehensive fertility coverage (85% of women); 83% said the same of insurers. Sample: mean age 34.3; 56.7% female; 36.4% reported at least one diagnosed metabolic condition; 14.7% of women reported PCOS. Recruited via CloudResearch Connect panel.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org, 2021·Fertility and sterility
In the United States, economic, racial, ethnic, geographic, and other disparities prevent access to fertility treatment and affect treatment outcomes. This opinion examines the factors that contribute to these disparities, proposes actions to address them, and replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2015.
Flores R, 2016·Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences
The latest retrievable data about infertility in the Philippines was made available to the public by Merck Serono, a private pharmaceutical company who commissioned the survey in 2011. The survey was conducted by Synovate in 100 participating households in the Philippines, particularly in key cities located in Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. The survey results revealed that one out of ten Filipino couples are suffering from infertility. And these couples are not seeking treatment due to the following reasons: (1) financial constraints; (2) time constraints; and (3) the patient’s belief. Of all these, financial constraints, at 86%, is the primary reason why infertile couples are not seeking treatment. In addition to this data, the Chief of The Medical City’s Reproductive Medicine, Infertility and Gynecologic Endoscopy, Dr. Marc Anthony Ancheta, further reveals that “some 35 to 40% of a couple’s inablity to conceive a child are due to female factors; while the other 35 to 40% could be attributed to male factors.” While male factor infertility is also deserving of proper attention, it is the female factor infertility that should receive greater attention and focus in terms of treatment. Why? Because, primarily, the female’s reproductive cycle is very complex and would need months and/or years to partially identify the underlying reason/s of infertility; and second, the female’s ability to conceive naturally will fall by 50% when she reached the age of 35. Therefore, there should be urgency in treating female factor infertility in an efficient, ethical and affordable way. And these conditions can be achieved by the use of NaPro Technology.
Comment in Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):47-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.043. To systematically quantify the impact of consumer cost on assisted reproduction technology (ART) utilization and numbers of embryos transferred. Ordinary least squared (OLS) regression models were constructed to measure the independent impact of ART affordability-measured as consumer cost relative to average disposable income-on ART utilization and embryo transfer practices. Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing ART treatment. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): OLS regression coefficient for ART affordability, which estimates the independent effect of consumer cost relative to income on utilization and number of embryos transferred. RESULT(S): ART affordability was independently and positively associated with ART utilization with a mean OLS coefficient of 0.032. This indicates that, on average, a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 1 percentage point of disposable income predicts a 3.2% increase in utilization. ART affordability was independently and negatively associated with the number of embryos transferred, indicating that a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 10 percentage points of disposable income predicts a 5.1% increase in single-embryo transfer cycles. CONCLUSION(S): The relative cost that consumers pay for ART treatment predicts the level of access and number of embryos transferred. Policies that affect ART funding should be informed by these findings to ensure equitable access to treatment and clinically responsible embryo transfer practices.