Study of 54 habitual aborters with low or normal pregnanediol excretion, in a double-blind trial, revealed the spontaneous-salvage rate and the possible benefit of therapy with medroxyprogesterone acetate. The salvage rate in the placebo group with the worst prognosis (never a term pregnancy, low pregnanediol in the current pregnancy) was ten of 13, and the salvage rate in the other placebo groups showed no statistically significant difference. In view of this high spontaneous salvage rate, the numbers required to demonstrate a therapeutic effect of progestin administration are prohibitively large. This indicates the need for new criteria to pinpoint cases with a poor prognosis, and it raises the question whether habitual abortion is a disease entity or a statistical coincidence.
PMID 14121287 14121287 DOI 10.1001/jama.1964.03060330031008 10.1001/jama.1964.03060330031008 Goldzieher et al. 1964, Goldzieher 1964
Cite this article
Goldzieher, J. W. (1964). Double-blind trial of a progestin in habitual abortion. JAMA, 188(7), 651-654. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1964.03060330031008
Goldzieher JW. Double-blind trial of a progestin in habitual abortion. JAMA. 1964;188(7):651-654. doi:10.1001/jama.1964.03060330031008
Goldzieher, J. W. "Double-blind trial of a progestin in habitual abortion." JAMA, vol. 188, no. 7, 1964, pp. 651-654.
The plasma concentrations of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in 14 women administered the progestagen for threatened abortion during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy were measured by specific radioimmunoassay. Treatment (52 nmol orally every 6 h) was continued to 18 weeks of gestation. The mean plasma concentration of MPA rose rapidly during day 1 of treatment to 14.1 +/- 1.84 nmol/l. It reached 21.5 +/- 2.3 nmol/l by 7 days and subsequently stabilized at around 26.8 +/- 5.0 nmol/l by the end of week 2. Urinary steroid profiles were determined by gas-liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry for six of the MPA-treated women and compared with those of six untreated women of similar gestational age. No differences were detected between the two groups of women, suggesting that the administration of MPA during pregnancy did not alter qualitatively or quantitatively the metabolism and excretion into urine of progesterone and oestrogens.
To determine the effectiveness of oral micronized progesterone, alprazolam, and placebo in premenstrual syndrome (PMS) treatment and the effect of clinical contact on treatment responses. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 3-month parallel treatment arms with flexible dosage and with the length of clinical contact randomized within each treatment group. University hospital PMS medical treatment outpatient program in obstetrics/gynecology department. Among volunteers for PMS treatment, 444 were evaluated and 185 meeting defined PMS criteria were randomized to treatment; treatment data are available for 170. There were no medical withdrawals for adverse events. A double-blinded protocol in which 300 mg of oral micronized progesterone, 0.25 mg of alprazolam, or placebo was administered four times a day from day 18 of the menstrual cycle through day 2 of the next cycle, including taper. The mean daily dose at the third treatment was 1760 mg of progesterone or 1.5 mg of alprazolam. Subjects were randomized to brief (< 20 minutes) or extended (50 minutes) visits. Daily symptom report (DSR) scored for total DSR symptoms, four DSR factors. Alprazolam was significantly better than placebo or progesterone for total premenstrual symptoms and DSR factors of mental function, pain, and mood. Thirty-seven percent of the alprazolam group experienced a 50% reduction in total DSR scores. There were no clinically significant withdrawal symptoms when alprazolam administration was restricted to the luteal phase. Oral micronized progesterone therapy was no better than placebo. Brief vs extended visits had no effect on treatment outcome. Treatment response was associated with severity of premenstrual symptoms at baseline but with no other diagnostic variables. Alprazolam has a role in PMS treatment and offers a therapy limited to the luteal phase. Oral micronized progesterone is ineffective for PMS.
Progesterone is the most widely used treatment for premenstrual syndrome. To answer definitely the question of whether progesterone suppositories are effective for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of 168 women, receiving progesterone in doses of 400 and 800 mg or placebo, was carried out. Premenstrual symptoms were not significantly improved by progesterone compared with placebo in any measure used in the study, including daily symptom reports maintained throughout treatment, clinician evaluation of improvement, and patient global reports of symptoms severity, relief, and disruption of daily activity. No symptom cluster or individual symptom differed significantly between progesterone and placebo treatment. These treatment results were not significantly affected by fluctuations in response during the placebo washout period, pretreatment levels of depression or anxiety at either postmenstrual or premenstrual times, or any of 19 other background, medical history, or symptom variables examined individually as covariates with treatment.
reproductive-endocrinology/ovarian-hormones/progesteronetherapeutics/hormonal-agents/progesterone-and-progestins
Open Access