A double-blind cross-over placebo controlled trial was carried out to compare progesterone 200 mg with a placebo, both given in rectal suppositories, in 20 patients with the pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS). Each kind of suppository was used twice daily from mid-cycle to the onset of menstruation during two successive cycles. Six patients did not complete the trial. Daily scores for a number of psychological and somatic symptoms were recorded by the participants. Mean symptom scores in the last seven days of the pre-menstruum did not differ significantly between the two treatment periods. The participants did not express a significant preference for the progesterone therapy. Mean blood levels of FSH, oestradiol, prolactin and LH, determined on the first day of menstruation did not differ between the two periods of treatment. Side effects, in the form of electrolyte abnormalities or hepatic or renal function disturbances, were not seen. In this trial, progesterone 200 mg twice daily by the rectal route was not more effective than the placebo.
DOI 10.3109/01674828309088321 10.3109/01674828309088321
Cite this article
Van der Meer, Y. G., Benedeck-Jaszmann, L. J., & Van Loenen, A. C. (1983). Effect of High-Dose Progesterone on the Pre-menstrual Syndrome: A double-blind cross-over trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2(4), 220-222. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674828309088321
Van der Meer YG, Benedeck-Jaszmann LJ, Van Loenen AC. Effect of High-Dose Progesterone on the Pre-menstrual Syndrome: A double-blind cross-over trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1983;2(4):220-222. doi:10.3109/01674828309088321
Van der Meer, Y. G., et al. "Effect of High-Dose Progesterone on the Pre-menstrual Syndrome: A double-blind cross-over trial." Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 2, no. 4, 1983, pp. 220-222.
To determine whether cyclic medroxyprogesterone treatment given without estrogen causes adverse symptoms in postmenopausal women. This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial of 10 days/month of medroxyprogesterone and placebo treatments given during 2 consecutive months in random order. Participants recorded their physiologic and emotional experiences on a 0-4 scale using a daily diary form. Eleven postmenopausal women aged 43-63 completed the study. The subjects were not taking hormones. Height, weight, and serum estradiol concentration were measured once. In each woman, the sum of scores for the 10 days of medroxyprogesterone was compared to the sum of scores for the 10 days of placebo using nonparametric tests. No significant differences in scores were found between the 10 days on medroxyprogesterone and the 10 days on placebo. The median and range for the composite scores for premenstrual-like symptoms were 26 (20-67) during medroxyprogesterone and 25 (19-40) during placebo (P = .39). Medroxyprogesterone given alone does not cause adverse symptoms in postmenopausal women. Therefore, medroxyprogesterone therapy, by itself, cannot explain the side effects reported by postmenopausal women taking combined hormones.
Progesterone is the most widely used treatment for premenstrual syndrome. To answer definitely the question of whether progesterone suppositories are effective for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of 168 women, receiving progesterone in doses of 400 and 800 mg or placebo, was carried out. Premenstrual symptoms were not significantly improved by progesterone compared with placebo in any measure used in the study, including daily symptom reports maintained throughout treatment, clinician evaluation of improvement, and patient global reports of symptoms severity, relief, and disruption of daily activity. No symptom cluster or individual symptom differed significantly between progesterone and placebo treatment. These treatment results were not significantly affected by fluctuations in response during the placebo washout period, pretreatment levels of depression or anxiety at either postmenstrual or premenstrual times, or any of 19 other background, medical history, or symptom variables examined individually as covariates with treatment.
Hammarbäck S et al., 1988·Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
A treatment with the GnRH-agonist, buserelin, was given intranasally in a dosage of 400 micrograms once daily, to induce anovulation in 26 women with premenstrual tension syndrome; 23 patients completed the study course. The design was double-blind and cross-over. Daily symptom ratings were made for two pretreatment, diagnostic cycles and continued for up to six cycles or 6 months. The rating scale used was an earlier described visual analogue scale. Blood samples for estradiol and progesterone radio-immunoassay were taken once weekly throughout the study. Results show beneficial effects of both placebo and GnRH-agonist, compared with the pretreatment situation. The GnRH-agonist was, however, significantly better than placebo. At the end of the treatment periods the patients while still taking placebo, still showed cyclical symptom changes, whereas during the GnRH-agonist treatment the cyclical changes had disappeared. The results indicate that a factor from the corpus luteum must be involved in the etiology of cyclical mood changes. The results also show that inhibition of ovulation by mean of GnRH-agonists is one possible way to treat premenstrual tension syndrome.
Reproductive EndocrinologySHBG ModulationProgesterone TreatmentProgesterone and SHBG
Thirty-one women with severe premenstrual syndrome had low sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) binding capacities 30.2 +/- 9.4 nmol DHT bound/l. The SHBG binding capacities rose when they were treated with three different doses of progesterone. On 400 mg (17 women) SHBG level was 45.11 +/- 11.80. On 800 mg (8 women) SHBG binding capacity rose to 64.75 +/- 14.30 and on the six women who took 1200 mg progesterone daily SHBG binding capacity was 78.5 +/- 23.10. These results are discussed.