A double-blind cross-over placebo controlled trial was carried out to compare progesterone 200 mg with a placebo, both given in rectal suppositories, in 20 patients with the pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS). Each kind of suppository was used twice daily from mid-cycle to the onset of menstruation during two successive cycles. Six patients did not complete the trial. Daily scores for a number of psychological and somatic symptoms were recorded by the participants. Mean symptom scores in the last seven days of the pre-menstruum did not differ significantly between the two treatment periods. The participants did not express a significant preference for the progesterone therapy. Mean blood levels of FSH, oestradiol, prolactin and LH, determined on the first day of menstruation did not differ between the two periods of treatment. Side effects, in the form of electrolyte abnormalities or hepatic or renal function disturbances, were not seen. In this trial, progesterone 200 mg twice daily by the rectal route was not more effective than the placebo.
DOI 10.3109/01674828309088321 10.3109/01674828309088321 Van der Meer et al. 1983, Van der Meer 1983
Cite this article
Van der Meer, Y. G., Benedeck-Jaszmann, L. J., & Van Loenen, A. C. (1983). Effect of High-Dose Progesterone on the Pre-menstrual Syndrome: A double-blind cross-over trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2(4), 220-222. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674828309088321
Van der Meer YG, Benedeck-Jaszmann LJ, Van Loenen AC. Effect of High-Dose Progesterone on the Pre-menstrual Syndrome: A double-blind cross-over trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1983;2(4):220-222. doi:10.3109/01674828309088321
Van der Meer, Y. G., et al. "Effect of High-Dose Progesterone on the Pre-menstrual Syndrome: A double-blind cross-over trial." Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 2, no. 4, 1983, pp. 220-222.
Rafieian-Kopaei M et al., 2017·Electronic physician
Vitex agnus-castus, also called vitex is aboriginal to the Mediterranean region, with long leaves, tender stem, flowers and ripening seeds. The aim of this study was to overview premenstrual, postmenstrual and infertility disorder of Vitex agnus-castus. This review article was carried out by searching studies in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and IranMedex databases. The initial search strategy identified about 87 references. In this study, 43 studies were accepted for further screening, and met all our inclusion criteria (in English, full text, therapeutic effects of Vitex agnus-castus and dated mainly from the year 2009 to 2016). The search terms were Vitex agnus-castus, premenstrual, postmenstrual, infertility disorder properties and pharmacological effects. Vitex agnus-castus was shown to contribute to the treatment of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Moreover, the result of the present study showed that this valuable plant is helpful in alleviation of pain resulting from postmenstrual disease. Furthermore, it was found that Vitex agnus-castus is beneficial in infertility disorder. Vitex agnus-castus (AC) is a phytopharmaceutical compound and is shown to be widely used to treat PMS and PMDD. In addition, it was shown to be beneficial in post-menstrual cases and it can also contribute to treatment of infertility cases in both men and women. Dopaminergic compounds available in this plant help to treat premenstrual mastodynia as well as other symptoms of the premenstrual syndrome.
To evaluate the efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome. Systematic review of published randomised, placebo controlled trials. 10 trials of progesterone therapy (531 women) and four trials of progestogen therapy (378 women). Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progesterone preparations (suppositories and oral micronised). Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progestogens. Secondary analysis of efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in managing physical and behavioural symptoms. Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed efficacy of progesterone (by both routes of administration) was -0.028 (95% confidence interval -0.017 to -0.040). The odds ratio was 1.05 (1.03 to 1.08) in favour of progesterone, indicating no clinically important difference between progesterone and placebo. For progestogens the overall standardised mean was -0.036 (-0.014 to -0.060), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) showing a statistically, but not clinically, significant improvement for women taking progestogens. The evidence from these meta-analyses does not support the use of progesterone or progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome.
To determine the effectiveness of oral micronized progesterone, alprazolam, and placebo in premenstrual syndrome (PMS) treatment and the effect of clinical contact on treatment responses. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 3-month parallel treatment arms with flexible dosage and with the length of clinical contact randomized within each treatment group. University hospital PMS medical treatment outpatient program in obstetrics/gynecology department. Among volunteers for PMS treatment, 444 were evaluated and 185 meeting defined PMS criteria were randomized to treatment; treatment data are available for 170. There were no medical withdrawals for adverse events. A double-blinded protocol in which 300 mg of oral micronized progesterone, 0.25 mg of alprazolam, or placebo was administered four times a day from day 18 of the menstrual cycle through day 2 of the next cycle, including taper. The mean daily dose at the third treatment was 1760 mg of progesterone or 1.5 mg of alprazolam. Subjects were randomized to brief (< 20 minutes) or extended (50 minutes) visits. Daily symptom report (DSR) scored for total DSR symptoms, four DSR factors. Alprazolam was significantly better than placebo or progesterone for total premenstrual symptoms and DSR factors of mental function, pain, and mood. Thirty-seven percent of the alprazolam group experienced a 50% reduction in total DSR scores. There were no clinically significant withdrawal symptoms when alprazolam administration was restricted to the luteal phase. Oral micronized progesterone therapy was no better than placebo. Brief vs extended visits had no effect on treatment outcome. Treatment response was associated with severity of premenstrual symptoms at baseline but with no other diagnostic variables. Alprazolam has a role in PMS treatment and offers a therapy limited to the luteal phase. Oral micronized progesterone is ineffective for PMS.
Progesterone is the most widely used treatment for premenstrual syndrome. To answer definitely the question of whether progesterone suppositories are effective for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of 168 women, receiving progesterone in doses of 400 and 800 mg or placebo, was carried out. Premenstrual symptoms were not significantly improved by progesterone compared with placebo in any measure used in the study, including daily symptom reports maintained throughout treatment, clinician evaluation of improvement, and patient global reports of symptoms severity, relief, and disruption of daily activity. No symptom cluster or individual symptom differed significantly between progesterone and placebo treatment. These treatment results were not significantly affected by fluctuations in response during the placebo washout period, pretreatment levels of depression or anxiety at either postmenstrual or premenstrual times, or any of 19 other background, medical history, or symptom variables examined individually as covariates with treatment.