Potashnik, G., Lerner-Geva, L., Genkin, L., Chetrit, A., Lunenfeld, E., & Porath, A. (1999). Fertility drugs and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers: results of a long-term follow-up study. Fertility and sterility, 71(5), 853-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00085-0
Potashnik G, Lerner-Geva L, Genkin L, Chetrit A, Lunenfeld E, Porath A. Fertility drugs and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers: results of a long-term follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):853-859. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00085-0
Potashnik, G., et al. "Fertility drugs and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers: results of a long-term follow-up study." Fertility and sterility, vol. 71, no. 5, 1999, pp. 853-859.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
To investigate a possible linkage between the use of fertility drugs for infertility and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers.
Design
Long-term, historic-prospective study.
Setting
Fertility clinic in a university hospital.
Patients
Files of 1,197 infertile women with a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 17.9+/-5 years (21,407 person-years) were reviewed. Diagnoses, number of courses, and dosage of fertility drugs were extracted from the files.
Interventions
Cancers were identified by record linkage to the National Cancer Registry. Histopathologic reports and data on estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer tissue were also reviewed.
Main Outcome Measures
Standardized incidence ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for risk assessment.
Results
Of 20 breast cancers (standardized incidence ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.83-2.10]), 16 were detected among 780 women who had been exposed to 3,978 cycles of clomiphene citrate (CC) and/or hMG (standardized incidence ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 0.94-2.68]). The standardized incidence ratio for this cancer was significantly increased only in patients with one or two CC treatments and a dose of < or =1,000 mg (2.6 [1.19-5.0] and 2.52 [1.21-4.64], respectively). Two cases of ovarian cancer (1 patient unexposed) were observed with no evidence of excessive risk. Six of the eight patients with data on estrogen and progesterone receptors were exposed to CC, and all tested positive for these receptors.
Conclusions
An association between the use of fertility drugs and an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancers has not been confirmed.
Fauser BC et al., 2014·Reproductive biomedicine online
The Sixth Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Group Meeting was held to evaluate the impact of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on the health of assisted-conception children. Epidemiologists, reproductive endocrinologists, embryologists and geneticists presented data from published literature and ongoing research on the incidence of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities and congenital malformations in assisted-conception versus naturally conceived children to reach a consensus on the reasons for potential differences in outcomes between these two groups. IVF-conceived children have lower birthweights and higher peripheral fat, blood pressure and fasting glucose concentrations than controls. Growth, development and cognitive function in assisted-conception children are similar to controls. The absolute risk of imprinting disorders after assisted reproduction is less than 1%. A direct link between assisted reproduction and health-related outcomes in assisted-conception children could not be established. Women undergoing assisted reproduction are often older, increasing the chances of obtaining abnormal gametes that may cause deviations in outcomes between assisted-conception and naturally conceived children. However, after taking into account these factors, it is not clear to what extent poorer outcomes are due to the assisted reproduction procedures themselves. Large-scale, multicentre, prospective epidemiological studies are needed to investigate this further and to confirm long-term health consequences in assisted-conception children. Assisted reproduction treatment is a general term used to describe methods of achieving pregnancy by artificial means and includes IVF and sperm implantation. The effect of assisted reproduction treatment on the health of children born using these artificial methods is not fully understood. In April 2011, fertility research experts met to give presentations based on research in this area and to look carefully at the evidence for the effects of assisted reproduction treatment on children's health. The purpose of this review was to reach an agreement on whether there are differences in the health of assisted-conception children with naturally conceived children. The researchers discovered no increased risk in birth defects in assisted-conception children compared with naturally conceived children. They found that IVF-conceived children have lower birth weights and higher fat under the skin, higher blood pressure and higher fasting glucose concentrations than naturally conceived children; however, growth, development and cognitive function are similar between groups. A very low risk of disorders of genetic control was observed in assisted-conception children. Overall, there did not appear to be a direct link between assisted reproduction treatment and children's health. The researchers concluded that the cause of some differences in the health of children conceived using assisted reproduction treatment may be due to the age of the woman receiving treatment. Large-scale, research studies are needed to study the long-term health of children conceived using assisted reproduction treatment.
Cancer and Fertility · Hormone Sensitive Cancer and Reproductive Care
Among 2,496 infertile Israeli women treated between 1964 and 1974, 143 cancer cases were observed as compared with 116.1 expected (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.5) through 1991. Site-specific analysis revealed 12 ovarian cancers versus 7.2 expected (SIR = 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-2.9), 21 endometrial cancers versus 4.3 expected (SIR = 4.85, 95% CI 3.0-7.4), and 59 breast cancers versus 46.6 expected (SIR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.96-1.6). Sensitivity analysis revealed that confounding was unlikely to explain the raised risk of endometrial cancer, but nulliparity might explain the increased risk of ovarian cancer. The excess of endometrial cancer was prominent among patients with normal estrogen production but progesterone deficiency (SIR = 9.4, 95% CI 5.0-16.0). The risk for ovarian cancer was similar among the total groups of treated and untreated patients (SIR = 1.7 vs. 1.6). The standardized incidence ratio for endometrial cancer was higher among the treated group than the untreated group, although not significantly. Treatment with ovulation-inducing drugs does not appear to increase the risk for ovarian cancer, but its role cannot be completely excluded.
Related research
Cancer and Fertility · Hormone Sensitive Cancer and Reproductive Care
Concern has been expressed that exposure to fertility drugs might be associated with a risk of ovarian cancer. We have examined the incidence of breast and ovarian cancer in a cohort of 10,358 women referred for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment in Victoria, Australia, between 1978 and 1992. The "exposed" group (n = 5564) had had ovarian stimulation to induce multiple folliculogenesis and the "unexposed" group (n = 4794) had been referred for IVF but were untreated or had had "natural cycle" treatment without ovarian stimulation. Duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 15 years. Cases of cancer were determined by record linkage with data from population-based cancer registries. 34 cases of invasive breast cancer and 6 of invasive ovarian cancer were observed. A comparison with the expected numbers, derived by applying age-standardised general population rates to the cohort gave standardised incidence ratios (SIR) for breast cancer of 0.89 (95% CI 0.55-1.46) in the exposed group and 0.98 (0.62-1.56) in the unexposed group, and for ovarian cancer SIRs were 1.70 (0.55-5.27) and 1.62 (0.52-5.02), respectively. Rates of all cancers were not significantly different from general population rates. The relative risk (RR) of cancer, adjusted for age and infertility type, was, in the treated group compared with the untreated group, 1.11 (95% CI 0.56-2.20) for breast cancer and 1.45 (0.28-7.55) for ovarian cancer. The risk of body of uterus cancer was increased in the exposed and unexposed groups combined (SIR 2.84 [1.18-6.81]). Women with unexplained infertility, independent of IVF exposure, had significantly increased risks of ovarian cancer (RR = 19.19 [2.23-165.0]) and body of uterus cancer (RR = 6.34 [1.06-38.0]) compared with women with known causes of infertility. This relatively short-term follow-up suggests that ovarian stimulation with IVF is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Although there was no significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer after ovarian stimulation with IVF the small number of cases limits the conclusions that can be drawn. Longer-term follow-up of large cohorts of women who have been in IVF programmes will be necessary.
Cancer and Fertility · Hormone Sensitive Cancer and Reproductive Care
Case reports and the results of a recent case-control study have raised questions about the potential neoplastic effects of medications used as treatment for infertility. We examined the risk of ovarian tumors in a cohort of 3837 women evaluated for infertility between 1974 and 1985 in Seattle. Computer linkage with a population-based tumor registry was used to identify women in whom tumors were diagnosed before January 1, 1992. Data on infertility testing and treatment were abstracted from the medical records of women who had ovarian cancer and those of a randomly selected comparison group. The risk of ovarian tumors associated with exposure to ovulation-inducing medications was assessed through an age-standardized comparison with the rate of ovarian tumors in the general population, and Cox regression analysis was used to compare the risk of cancer among women who received these medications with the risk among infertile women who did not receive them. There were 11 invasive or borderline malignant ovarian tumors, as compared with an expected number of 4.4 (standardized incidence ratio, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.5). Nine of the women in whom ovarian tumors developed had taken clomiphene; the adjusted relative risk among these women, as compared with that among infertile women who had not taken this drug, was 2.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 11.4). Five of the nine women had taken the drug during 12 or more monthly cycles. This period of treatment was associated with an increased risk of ovarian tumors among both women with ovarian abnormalities and those without apparent abnormalities (relative risk, 11.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 82.3), whereas treatment with the drug for less than one year was not associated with an increased risk. Prolonged use of clomiphene may increase the risk of a borderline or invasive ovarian tumor.
Cancer and Fertility · Hormone Sensitive Cancer and Reproductive Care
Controversy surrounds the relations among infertility, fertility drug use, and the risk of ovarian cancer. The authors pooled interview data on infertility and fertility drug use from eight case-control studies conducted between 1989 and 1999 in the United States, Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, adjusting for age, race, family history of ovarian cancer, duration of oral contraception use, tubal ligation, gravidity, education, and site. Included in the analysis were 5,207 cases and 7,705 controls. Among nulligravid women, attempts for more than 5 years to become pregnant compared with attempts for less than 1 year increased the risk of ovarian cancer 2.67-fold (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.91, 3.74). Among nulliparous, subfertile women, neither any fertility drug use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.90, 2.87) nor more than 12 months of use (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.45, 5.27) was associated with ovarian cancer. Fertility drug use in nulligravid women was associated with borderline serous tumors (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.01, 5.88) but not with any invasive histologic subtypes. Endometriosis (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.71) and unknown cause of infertility (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.40) increased cancer risk. These data suggest a role for specific biologic causes of infertility, but not for fertility drugs in overall risk for ovarian cancer.
Cancer and Fertility · Hormone Sensitive Cancer and Reproductive Care
The possibility that ovulation induction increases the risk of ovarian cancer remains unproven. However, recent studies suggest that both infertility and endometriosis may be independent risk factors. Despite the various case reports and epidemiological studies performed the association between the use of infertility drugs and ovarian cancer remains weak. The fact that the women who were the first to use ovulation agents are now reaching mid-life means that future studies should show whether any association exists. Hence, there is a need now for large prospective trials to be performed to establish whether an association between ovulation induction agents and ovarian cancer truly exists.
General Gynecology › Cancer and Fertility › Hormone Sensitive Cancer and Reproductive Care · Therapeutics › Ovulation Agents › Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators · Assisted Reproduction › Safety and Risks › Maternal Complications
PMID 10231045 10231045 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00085-0 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00085-0 Potashnik et al. 1999, Potashnik 1999
Cite this article
Potashnik, G., Lerner-Geva, L., Genkin, L., Chetrit, A., Lunenfeld, E., & Porath, A. (1999). Fertility drugs and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers: results of a long-term follow-up study. Fertility and sterility, 71(5), 853-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00085-0
Potashnik G, Lerner-Geva L, Genkin L, Chetrit A, Lunenfeld E, Porath A. Fertility drugs and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers: results of a long-term follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):853-859. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00085-0
Potashnik, G., et al. "Fertility drugs and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers: results of a long-term follow-up study." Fertility and sterility, vol. 71, no. 5, 1999, pp. 853-859.
