Bone Health · Hormones and Bone

FSH and bone--important physiology or not?

Prior JC

Published January 2007 Trends in Molecular Medicine, 13(1), 1-3
DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004 PMID 17141571

Abstract

For many years, osteoporosis in women was equated with estrogen deficiency. The recent articles by Zaidi and colleagues offer a new challenge to the estrogen-deficiency-osteoporosis hypothesis by showing that follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulates osteoclastic bone resorption perhaps through tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). These authors, however, neglected to mention bone abnormalities and high testosterone levels that were previously shown in FSH-receptor knockout and other modified mice. It is also possible that they have overemphasized potential relationships of these new data with human bone loss. Despite these fascinating data, the paradigm of FSH causing hypogonadal bone loss is not yet ready to displace the estrogen-deficiency-osteoporosis paradigm, although that model already faces considerable challenge.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Bone Health › Hormones and Bone › Estrogen and Bone · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Estrogen
Jerilynn C Prior
J Prior
PMID 17141571 17141571 DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.004 Prior et al. 2007, Prior 2007