To report long-term mortality after oophorectomy or ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy in subgroups of women based on age at the time of surgery, use of estrogen therapy, presence of risk factors for coronary heart disease, and length of follow-up.
Methods
This was a prospective cohort study of 30,117 Nurses' Health Study participants undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for death from coronary heart disease, stroke, breast cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, total cancer, and all causes were determined comparing bilateral oophorectomy (n=16,914) with ovarian conservation (n=13,203).
Results
Over 28 years of follow-up, 16.8% of women with hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy died from all causes compared with 13.3% of women who had ovarian conservation (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.21). Oophorectomy was associated with a lower risk of death from ovarian cancer (four women with oophorectomy compared with 44 women with ovarian conservation) and, before age 47.5 years, a lower risk of death from breast cancer. However, at no age was oophorectomy associated with a lower risk of other cause-specific or all-cause mortality. For women younger than 50 years at the time of hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy was associated with significantly increased mortality in women who had never used estrogen therapy but not in past and current users: assuming a 35-year lifespan after oophorectomy: number needed to harm for all-cause death=8, coronary heart disease death=33, and lung cancer death=50.
Conclusions
Bilateral oophorectomy is associated with increased mortality in women aged younger than 50 years who never used estrogen therapy and at no age is oophorectomy associated with increased survival.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2026·Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
RCOG response (July 2026) to the NICE draft early-use guidance on Endotest and EndoSure. Underlines that it is draft guidance for consultation, not final approval. Notes Endotest's high reported accuracy comes from carefully selected groups of women with long-standing pelvic pain already at high risk of endometriosis, largely in specialist centres, with most evidence from teams linked to the test's developer in France; robust independent validation in other countries, age and ethnic groups and routine pathways including primary care is limited and urgently needed. Considers EndoSure experimental: near-perfect performance claims arise mainly from small developer-led studies, and both the biological mechanism and real-world performance are unvalidated. Supports linking early use to structured evidence generation.
Shenoy-Bhangle AS et al., 2026·J Magn Reson Imaging·
Endometriosis is a chronic multisystem disease caused by the presence of endometrium-like tissue outside the endometrial canal, inciting inflammation and fibrosis. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and MRI have replaced diagnostic laparoscopy as the noninvasive imaging modalities of choice for diagnosis and pre-surgical planning. Advanced disease in the pelvis can distort/obliterate anatomic planes and obscure the extent of pelvic organ involvement at laparoscopy. Unlike laparoscopy, MRI is not limited by anatomic distortion and provides accurate multi-compartment assessment of deep pelvic endometriosis involving the uterus and its ligaments, adnexa, bowel, distal ureters, urinary bladder, and pelvic nerves. Additionally, MRI can help detect extra-pelvic organ involvement in the same study. Use of a dedicated MRI protocol and structured reporting template improves multidisciplinary communication and provides a pre-surgical road map; helps patient counseling as well as assessing the need for additional intraoperative organ-specific expertise such as colorectal surgery or urology. Knowledge of MRI and laparoscopic correlation enhances recognition of the key MRI findings to include in the report for optimizing surgical outcomes. This article focuses on the role of MRI in the diagnosis and pre-surgical mapping of pelvic endometriosis, with correlation to laparoscopic findings. Evidence level: 1. Technical efficacy: 5.
De Corte P, 2025·BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Endometriosis diagnosis reportedly faces delays of up to 10 years. Despite growing awareness and improved guidelines, information on the current status is limited. To systematically assess the published evidence on the status of time to diagnosis in individuals with endometriosis, with respect to the definition of time to diagnosis, geographical location and patient characteristics. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase were searched for publications reporting time to diagnosing endometriosis since 2018. No restrictions to population or comparators were applied. All publications were screened by two independent reviewers. Search results were limited to primary publications of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and observational studies. Case reports, secondary publications and grey literature were excluded. No restrictions were made regarding language, provided that an English title and abstract were available. Publications were assessed with respect to time to diagnosis, diagnostic methods, study type, study country and potential bias. The 17 publications eligible for inclusion in this literature review were all observational studies. The publications reported diagnosis times between 0.3 and 12 years, with variations depending on the definition of time to diagnosis (overall, primary, or clinical), geographical location and characteristics of the included study population. Evidence was of poor to good quality overall. Diagnostic delay is still present, primarily driven by physicians, and this review underscores the need for standardised definitions, increased awareness and targeted diagnostic interventions.
Yeung P et al., 2025·Acta Scientific Women's Health·
The primary purpose of this prospective cohort study was to determine if treating endometriosis with optimal excision surgery leads to lower rates of repeat surgery as compared to historical rates of repeat surgery by ablation. A secondary outcome was to examine whether the use of hormonal suppression differed before surgery, depending on the stage of endometriosis found at surgery. Optimal excision was defined as completely excising all areas of abnormal peritoneum, wherever found in the pelvis, having looked systematically with near contact laparoscopy. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon specializing in optimal excision at a tertiary referral center. The rate of repeat surgery after optimal excision surgery for endometriosis was remarkably low (2.5%, 15/620) as compared to historical rates of repeat surgery by ablation. Additionally, the lack of significant evidence between hormonal suppression use and progression of stage of endometriosis provides implicit evidence that hormonal suppression does not prevent progression of the disease. Further controlled studies are needed to verify these findings.